, Research Paper

Faruk Tarek Faruk Tarek-1

Love, Murder, and Revenge

Murder in A Rose for Emily and Killings

History says the first offense of all time committed by one individual against another is slaying. There are so many things that can actuate a slaying such as love, hatred, green-eyed monster, and, retaliation. Both Faulkner s short narrative A Rose for Emily and Dubus s narrative Killings represent thoughts of slaying, love, green-eyed monster, and retaliation. However, love and slaying are presented in different ways in the two narratives. In A Rose for Emily Miss Emily kills her darling Homer because he deserts her, and in Killings Matt Fowler slayings Richard to take retaliation of his boy s barbarous decease. In fact, love and fondness play a great function on these slayings. Love is unsighted and sometimes it might take a individual to be a liquidator. Both narratives tell us how passionate love motivates a individual to perpetrate a slaying for the interest of love.

Both characters commit slaying in order to slake their thirst for mental satisfaction. In Faulkner s narrative Emily meets Homer shortly after her male parent s decease. She wants love from Homer to be rescued from being lonely. Her liking to Homer is great, nevertheless, his experiencing about the relationship is different. He is non truly like a marrying adult male. Faulkner says, Homer himself had remarked he liked work forces, and it was known

Faruk Tarek-2

that that he drank with the younger work forces in the mooses Club that he was non a marrying adult male ( 75 ) .Homer leaves the town for a piece and so comes back. She prepares for the weeding while he is off. Her deep love makes her paranoid about his going, because she does non desire to be left entirely. She can non believe of another adult female by his side. Finally, she decides to poison him and maintain his dead organic structure in her house. In fact, her ageless love to Homer motivates her to kill him and maintain his dead organic structure by her side forever. She feels that if she does non hold him alive, she could at least see him in her house everyday if he is dead.

In Dubus s narrative Richard kills Frank, Matt s boy with covetous motivations of love affair, treachery and fury. Revenge captures the bosom of both Matt and Richard in different signifiers. Matt becomes hideous when

Richard is out on bond and faces minimum gaol clip for slaying his boy. His married woman interruptions apart with heartache when she sees her boy s slayer in the town. In the narrative Matt describes She sees him all the clip. It makes her call. In order to slake his thirst for retaliation, he decides to take the jurisprudence in his ain custodies and programs to put to death Richard with the aid of a friend. On the other manus, Richard kills Frank because he is so covetous about his married woman s relationship with him. Matt loses himself in retaliation, and begins to transport an unregistered gun. He loves his boy really much. In fact, both fatherly love and never-say-die thirst of retaliation to the slayer motivate him for this slaying.

Faruk Tarek-3

I am more sympathetic to Matt than Emily. Matt s slaying has more justifiable ground than Emily. Emily kills Homer because she can non believe of another adult female by his side. But it s non just to kill some one merely because of blind love. Her attitude seems like she is the lone one Homer has to be with and no 1 else deserves him. Although she kills him for passionate love but it is truly inhumane and eldritch to poison person and maintain the dead organic structure old ages after old ages. Matt kills Richard to take the retaliation of his boy s decease. His bosom calls when his boy s liquidator is rolling around the town independently. It s truly difficult for any male parent to digest the heartache of a dead boy. The author says, So he and his kids had survived their long distance, and so he lose Frank in a manner no male parent expected to lose his boy, and he felt that all the frights he felt swept him out of see. Matt commits slaying for slaying. Matt s slaying makes me experience good because he takes retaliation of his boy s barbarous violent death and Emily s slaying merely for her brainsick love to Homer makes me experience bad. I truly experience bad for Homer because he dies for nonreversible love.

Both the authors create the narrative based on killing and love. These narratives teach us how a individual can be vindictive and bold in love. Love Teachs us to be generous. But Emily s blind love makes her a liquidator. Love does non do her generous. She does non allow his beloved travel off and she kills him. Matt s slaying satisfies his retaliation. His bosom does non digest the hurting and that makes him vindictive.