1700 Essay, Research Paper

New England and the Chesapeake part before

1700

Essay submitted by Unknown

Although New England and the Chesapeake part were both settled mostly by the

people of English beginning, by 1700 the parts had evolved into two distinguishable societies.

The grounds for this distinguishable development were largely based on the type on people

from England who chose to settle in the two countries, and on the mode in which the

countries were settled.

New England was a safety for spiritual separationists go forthing England, while people who

immigrated to the Chesapeake part had no spiritual motivations. As a consequence, New England

formed a much more spiritual society so the Chesapeake part. John Winthrop

provinces that their end was to organize & # 8220 ; a metropolis upon a hill & # 8221 ; , which represented a & # 8220 ; pure & # 8221 ;

community, where Christianity would be pursued in the most right mode. Both the

Pilgrims and the Puritans were really spiritual people. In both instances, the local

authorities was controlled by the same people who controlled the church, and the

Bible was the footing for all Torahs and ordinances. From the Article of Agreement,

Springfield, Massachusetts it is clear that faith was the footing for general Torahs. It

uses the phrase & # 8220 ; being by God & # 8217 ; s Providence engaged together to do a plantation & # 8221 ; ,

demoing that everything was done in God & # 8217 ; s name. The Wage and Price Regulations in

Connecticut is an illustration of common Torahs being justified by the Bible. Besides in this

papers the word & # 8220 ; community & # 8221 ; is emphasized, merely as Winthrop emphasizes it stating:

& # 8220 ; we must be knit together in this work as one adult male & # 8221 ; . The immigrants to New England

formed really household and sacredly orientated communities. Looking at the emigrant lists of

people bound for New England it is easy to detect that most people came in big

households, and big households support the community atmosphere. There were many

kids among the emigres, and those kids were taught faith from their early

childhood, and hence grew up loyal to the church, and easy governable by the

same. Any perverts from the government were silenced or persecuted before they could

get down any motions that would be a menace to the authorit

Y of the church. Even

people like Ann Hutchinson and Roger Williams, who merely somewhat deviated from the

instruction of the Puritan church were expelled and forced to travel to Rode Island. As a

consequence of this tight spiritual control the society became really conservative in New

England, and life evolved to be simple and non luxuriant as in Virginia. In the

Chesapeake part about everything was precisely face-to-face of New England. The

immigrants were non dreamers, but materialists, most of whom sought money. As John

Smith references in his History of Virginia, many sought gold. As it can be observed from

the ship & # 8217 ; s list of emigres bound for Virginia, the immigrants were largely immature people,

most of them work forces, and like it is stated in the same list they were all conformists of the

Church of England, and unlike the Puritans, were non discriminated against back in

England. As John Smith points out, many attempted to travel back when they found

troubles alternatively of chances to acquire rich. Many others died of hungriness when the

Corporations that brought the colonists to America abandoned them, and the trouble of

the state of affairs is described in Document G. The population was really little and the

dangers were immense. The innovators had to support themselves against both, the Dutch

and the Indians. As a consequence, the people who survived the first few old ages were all immature

ambitious and pitiless innovators. These were non the type of people who would be

easy controlled.

The independency of the innovators of Virginia can be seen in Bacon & # 8217 ; s Manifesto. These

people were non afraid to dispute authorization and believed that they had the full right

to state in the government of the settlements. These people believed that if they had survived

the difficult times with no or small aid from governments, those governments had no rights to

enforce Torahs upon them, particularly if those Torahs were seen as unjust.

As a consequence of these differences two wholly different types of people formed in New

England and in the Chesapeake part. New Englanders were faithful followings of the

instructions of their church, and the Southerners became independent citizens, with the

ability to form and the will to contend to acquire what they wanted.