Obedience Essay, Research Paper
Though conforming to group is the easiest option, standing up for what you believe shows you to be a individual of character. If a individual doesn & # 8217 ; t utilize their ethical motives to do determinations, there is much more room for struggle. Peoples that are easy suggestible likely have a harder clip finding what the right thing to make is. When a individual reaches a certain adulthood degree he/she is forced to get down make up one’s minding what the right thing to make is. They are no longer able to acquire away with making what a group they belong to wants.
A great illustration of person who did non follow the group was Martin Luther. At a clip when he could be thrown in gaol for talking bad against the Catholic church, he stood up for what he believed. His end was non to get down a new faith but reform the 1 that was already at that place. By posting the & # 8220 ; diet of worms & # 8221 ; he told Catholic functionaries where he thought the church had jobs. Luther knew he could be badly punished but decided to take that hazard to make what was right. He was non being pressured into making this by anyone. He merely knew it was the right thing to make and cognize he had to make it.
Because most people are members of more than one group, and sometimes those groups have conflicting involvements, a individual who is trusting on a group to do a determination will hold a really difficult clip. I find it the hardest to do a determination when I am being pushed in opposite waies by different groups. My parents think I should travel to bed so I can wake up for school while my friends think I should hang out with them subsequently. Everyone is faced with these sort of determinations every twenty-four hours. When you are a certain age your parents can & # 8217 ; t do you make anything and so you are forced to do your ain determination. Many childs feel they must hang out tardily so they are non made merriment of by their equals. They do non do determinations on facts but instead on feelings. Person doing their determination on facts would hold factored in: when their earliest category is, how much prep they have, how much slumber they need to be a productive pupil, etc.
A individual that is numbering on a group to do determinations will hold a harder clip finding what the & # 8220 ; right & # 8221 ; thing to make is. Most kids start out morally sound but ditch their ethical motives when seeking to derive credence with a certain crowd. Studies show that & # 8220 ; peer force per unit area & # 8221 ; is one of the biggest factors in whether a kid will experiment with harmful substances or non. Though the childs know these substances are bad and may harm their organic structures, they feel they must utilize them to derive credence. Because the childs are in a really awkward clip in their lives, the
Y want to experience normal by holding their personality defined by a group.
At a immature age we are taught to be obedient. We are punished if we do non make what our female parents say. This is so parents can maintain control of their kids. Childs are non mature adequate to do their ain determinations so we have person else do it for them. Childs are non capable of doing determinations for their hereafters. They make all determinations based on what they want at the clip. When a kid becomes more mature, hopefully he will hold the ability to do his ain determinations and non trust on a parent. A kid & # 8217 ; s parents make determinations they hope the kid will do in the hereafter. They are basically learning the kids how to do determinations.
When a individual reaches a certain adulthood degree, there are fewer incidents where a group influences their determinations. There are people who despite their age, are ever looking for person to take orders from. These people have other psychological jobs that prevent them from maturating past a pre-teen degree. A good illustration of a individual like that is Charles Ng. Charles Ng committed multiple slayings while taking orders from his spouse Leonard Lake. Ng & # 8217 ; s attorney & # 8217 ; s claimed he was non responsible for the slayings because he was merely a tool of Leonard Lake. The lone offense Ng committed was desiring credence from Leonard Lake. While a sane individual would halt seeking to be accepted when he/she was forced to slay, Ng thought being accepted by Leonard Lake was more of import than the lives of the many people he killed..
Not all bad determinations are made because of equal force per unit area. There are people who enjoy perpetrating offenses. These people are doing their ain determinations but have other psychological jobs. Leonard Lake was non taking orders from anyone and was presumptively non seeking to derive credence. He merely enjoyed watching people suffer. This is a bigger job than making the incorrect thing because you want to derive credence. A individual like that needs to acquire
professional aid.
Taking orders is no ground to perpetrate a offense. When Adolph Eichman was put on test for the offenses he committed in the concentration cantonments, he claimed he was merely following orders. He felt his life would be in danger if he didn & # 8217 ; t take the lives of many Jews. This shows the small regard he had for Judaic lives. He felt his life was more of import than the Jews lives and so he should be able to salvage his ain cervix by killing many Jews. Another individual, that didn & # 8217 ; t detest Hebrews, could non follow orders to anguish and putting to death people. There has to be a point where you halt being a soldier and get down being a homo.
