O.J. Simpson: Guilty Essay, Research Paper
O.J. Simpson: Guilty
This paper attempts to turn out that O.J. Simpson is guilty by giving
grounds from both sides, and statements made by informants.
On June 12, 1994, two people were viciously killed. Those two people
were Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. Nicole was O.J. Simpson & # 8217 ; s ex-wife.
O.J. was arrested the following twenty-four hours and charged with dual homicide.
O.J. pled guiltless to slay coursers against him and went to test in
condemnable tribunal. The test lasted a twelvemonth, and caused world-wide media exhilaration.
There was so much grounds against him, it seemed about impossible for
him to be that he & # 8217 ; d be found guiltless. For illustration, the celebrated bloody glove
found behind the guest house was proven by DNA proving to hold O.J. & # 8217 ; s blood and
hair, Nicole & # 8217 ; s blood and hair, and Ron & # 8217 ; s blood and hair. Deoxyribonucleic acid testing is 99.9
per centum accurate. Fibers were besides found on the baseball mitt that came from O.J. & # 8217 ; s
shirt and his Bronco ( Trudau, 122 ) .
Other grounds included a bloody footmark which matched O.J. & # 8217 ; s places,
blood on O.J. & # 8217 ; s Bronco door, on the console, on the interior side of the door, a
bloody footmark in the Bronco, bloody socks in O.J. & # 8217 ; s house, O.J. & # 8217 ; s injured
finger, blood found at Nicole & # 8217 ; s condo that matched O.J. & # 8217 ; s, and so on ( Posner,64 ) .
The defence claimed that the grounds had been planted.
On June 30th, Allen Wattenberg, a knife shop proprietor, testified during
the
preliminary hearing that O.J. bought a 14-inch Stiletto knife from his shop.
On June 12, O.J. & # 8217 ; s limo driver arrived to drive O.J. to the airdrome and saw a
black adult male, with the same physique as O.J. sprinting across the lawn towards O.J. & # 8217 ; s
house. Yet when O.J. answered the door, he said he & # 8217 ; d been catch a winking ( Biema, 56 ) .
O.J. besides acted guilty: he wrote a suicide note, and led constabularies on a
pursuit through L.A. that ended at his Brentwood sign of the zodiac with his resignation and
apprehension.
Despite all this grounds, the jury found O.J. non guilty. By all
histories, the prosecution did a hapless occupation showing the grounds. O.J. & # 8217 ; s
defence, called? The Dream Team, ? took advantage of the prosecutions
incompetency and created sensible uncertainty in the jurymans heads ( Posner, 62 ) .
O.J. & # 8217 ; s clip in tribunal is non over yet, nevertheless, he is now contending 2
civil instances, one for the detention of his kids, and the other against the
Browns and the Goldmans for? unlawful death. ? The same grounds that was used
in the condemnable instance is being presented much more efficaciously in the civil instance,
and it & # 8217 ; s expected the he will be found guilty. The? tribunal of popular sentiment?
has already found O.J. guilty, and his yearss as a famous person and corporate pitch
adult male are over everlastingly ( Posner, 64 ) . And if he is found guilty in his civil tests,
shouldn & # 8217 ; t that logically intend that he is guilty of the slayings, even though he
was found? non guilty? on legal trifles and incompetency.
