There are different research methods that have been guided by different doctrine of scientific discipline that were developed by philosopher. research worker and sociologist at their clip of epoch. The well-known research methods are quantitative research methods. Quantitative are numerical methods associated with deductive attacks. Quantitative research methods are normally guided by the rules of positivism as it takes on nonsubjective world and accepts individual world. Quantitative methods are normally used to mensurate size. detect numerical alteration over clip. audience cleavage. proving hypothesis. and. quantifying attitudes. behaviours and sentiments. The chief importance of quantitative research is on deductive logical thinking which tends to travel from the general to the particular. The cogency of decisions is shown to be dependent on one or more premises being valid. For illustration. All pupils who study MBA in Kathmandu University works in a bank. Seema surveies in MBA in Kathmandu University. Based on the premises. we can state that Seema works in a bank. Premisess used in deductive logical thinking are of import because defective premises can take to incorrect decisions.

Another popular method is qualitative method. which are normally associated with inductive attacks. Qualitative research methods are used on subjective affair. as in-depth survey to research capable affair. Qualitative research methods are guided by doctrines as post-positivism. critical theory. and constructivism. Qualitative research methods offer different sorts of ways to look into on research jobs as interview methods. focused group treatments. instance surveies and many others to understand the certain fortunes or civilization in the society.

The attack adopted by qualitative research workers tends to be inductive which means that they develop a theory or expression for a form of intending on the footing of the informations that they have collected. This involves a move from the particular to the general and is sometimes called a bottom-up attack. However. most research undertakings besides involve a certain grade of deductive logical thinking ( Trochim. 2005 ) .

Quantitative Research is more about roll uping numerical informations to analyze about certain phenomena. For illustration. what per centum of Nepali pupil who go to US for foreign degree complete alumnus class in United States? Other illustrations may be what per centum of Nepali pupils who are analyzing in TU have negative attitude towards TU disposals. One normally has to utilize quantitative research when one wants reply in Numberss. However. one has to analyze about complex state of affairss and travel with in-depth surveies so qualitative methods should be used.

For illustration. research worker wants to cognize how people view political relations in Nepal? Similarly. a research worker wants to make ethnographic survey of the civilization of Tharus of Nepal and lives with Tharu for some old ages. plunge himself/herself in that environment to detect the significances. convention of behaviour. and ways of believing of import in tharu civilizations.

Similarly. even though the choice of research methods are based upon the job selected. resource available. the accomplishments of research worker and audience of the research. both the methodological analysiss are besides used together in a research which is known as assorted methods. “Mixed methods frequently combine nomothetic and idiographic attacks in an effort to function the double intents of generalisation and in-depth understanding—to addition an overview of societal regularities from a larger sample while understanding the other through elaborate survey of a smaller sample. Full integrating of these attacks is hard. hence the predomination of constituent studies” ( Pat Bazeley. 2004 )

Mentions
( Bazeley. 2004 )
Social Research Methods. ( n. d. ) . Retrieved December 12. 2012. from World Wide Web. socialresearchmethods. cyberspace:
hypertext transfer protocol: //www. socialresearchmethods. net/kb/positivism ( 2005 ) . In W. M. Trochium. Research Methods ( 2nd ed. ) .