Relationship Between Drop Height and Diameter of Plasticine Sphere Essay

Free Articles

Problem: A pupil suggest that there is a relative relationship between tallness at which a Plasticine domain is dropped and the diameter of the planate portion after dropping. Design an experiment to find if this suggestion is true or non. Purposes: To look into the relationship between the bead tallness and the planate portion of a Plasticine sphere after being dropped.
Hypothesis: As the tallness of the sphere Plasticine increases the diameter additions.

Variables:

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Manipulating: The bead tallness of the sphere Plasticine
Reacting: The diameter of the planate portion of the domain. Controlled: The size of the ball. the surface country of the bead tallness and the stuff from which the domain is made. APPARATUS: Sphere Plasticine. metre swayer. Vernier calliper. twine. marker Method:

Make a sphere out of Plasticine and step its size utilizing the Vernier calliper to keep a changeless size throughout the experiment. Get a level and smooth surface country. Use a metre swayer to mensurate 60m above the surface country and keep the Plasticine to the swayer at the 60m and drop it. Wrap a piece of threading around the planate portion of the domain and utilize a marker to tag off where the twine Michigan. Measure the length of the threading up to where the grade stops utilizing a metre swayer. Divide the length of the twine by 3. 14 ( pi ) to acquire the diameter. Record the bead tallness and the diameter of the domain in a tabular array. Roll the Plasticine back into a sphere utilizing the measurings from the Vernier calliper. Measure 40m above the surface country utilizing a metre swayer and keep the Plasticine to the swayer and bead it from that tallness.

Wrap a piece of threading around the planate portion of the domain and utilize a marker to tag off where the twine Michigan. Measure the length of the threading up to where the grade stops utilizing a metre swayer. Divide the length of the twine by 3. 14 ( pi ) to acquire the diameter. Record the bead tallness and the diameter of the domain in a tabular array. Roll the Plasticine back into a sphere utilizing the measurings from the Vernier calliper. Measure 20m above the surface country utilizing a metre swayer and keep the Plasticine to the swayer and bead it from that tallness. Wrap a piece of threading around the planate portion of the domain and utilize a marker to tag off where the twine Michigan. Measure the length of the threading up to where the grade stops utilizing a metre swayer. Divide the length of the twine by 3. 14 ( pi ) to acquire the diameter. Record the bead tallness and the diameter of the domain in a tabular array. EXPECTED RESULTS

The domain that has a bead tallness of 60m should hold a larger diameter than the sphere with a bead tallness of 40m and 20m. The consequences should be recorded in a tabular array. Height Diameter

DATA Analysis:
The tallness at which the domain Plasticine is dropped and the diameter are straight relative therefore as the tallness additions so should the diameter. If the domain dropped at 60m has a larger diameter than the domain dropped at 40m or 20m so the hypothesis is accepted. If the domain dropped at 20m has a larger diameter than the domain dropped at 40m or 60m so the hypothesis is rejected. SOURCES OF ERRORS / PRECAUTIONS:

A beginning of mistake is parallax mistake and a safeguard to take to forestall this mistake is to make readings more than one time. enter them and happen the norm. Another beginning of mistake is non reading the Vernier graduated table on the Vernier calliper from the zero grade a safeguard to take is to do certain that you start reading the Vernier graduated table from the zero grade.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

x

Hi!
I'm Katy

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out