Existentialism refers to a philosophical idea proposed by the philosophers of 1900 A. D and 2000 A. D that placed accent on the being conditions of persons. their ideas. duties. actions and emotions. Friedrich Nietzsche and Kierkegaard are regarded as the establishing furthers of existential philosophy. the two philosophers have a batch of similarities on their plants. though they besides display marked differences on certain issues.
KIERKEGAAD’S AND NIETZSCHE’S SIMILAR IDEAS ON EXISTENTIALISM
Both of them placed more accent on subjective personal than they did on nonsubjective truths of scientific discipline and mathematics which they saw as detached and distinguishable from each other. Their plants besides express people’s battle to take a meaningful life and the use of recreation to avoid ennui. they besides emphasized on the individual’s to do a pick from available options particularly sing cardinal beliefs and values. and how such freedom can alter the individuality and nature of an person.
They besides criticized systematic constructions. rational and idealistic nature of doctrine. They veered off from this tendency by composing on self –affirmation of beliefs and character values. They further condemned negative impacts of Christianity on population. They rebuked the churches that strayed off from the instructions of Jesus Christ. UNCERTAINITIES OR CONFUSIONS ARISING FROM MY RESEARCH These confusions are based on assorted conflicting positions of the two philosophers that besides seem to contrast my cognition on existential philosophy.
This contrast is pronounced on their positions about the truth and the function of faith on an individual’s life. Soren Kierkegaard for case had a strong impression that a individual can finally specify himself depending on his believes about the truth. This means that persons internalise some belief systems that determine how they react to truth. For illustration it is a fact that the universe exists. but a theist may keep a wholly different position about the beginning of the existence as opposed to a Christian who strongly believes that it was created by God as taught by the Christianity religion.
Nietzsche on the other manus had a harder-edged position to the truth. This is because he wanted to travel to roots of the truth and extinguish any stuff that can blockade truth. For illustration he criticizes moral lessons learnt from dramatists as inherently false because they merely create a universe of sensed ethical motives which may non be a world in the existent universe. My sentiment about the truth is that they should be based on verifiable scientific facts.
Kierkegaard’s and Nietzsche’s existential philosophy work besides differs on their positions on whether faith plays an of import function on human life. Kierkegaard argued that Christianity and religion are personal experiences characterized by joy and apprehension and non comfort ability of Christendom’s societal assemblage. Nietzsche argues that Christians are strongly attached to their faith as a compensation for their personal failings. On my sentiment I feel that faith is really of import because it takes attention of the psyche and the head.
CONCLUSION Existentialism is a literary and a philosophical inclination that dismisses abstract theories which disguises the untidiness of human lives and dressed ores on the subjective worlds about personal being. freedom. and pick. Kierkegaard and Nietzsche plants concentrated on how people can take their ain lives. doing informed personal picks and personal autonomy. Mention: Soccio D. J. ( 2006 ) . Archetypes of Wisdom: An Introduction to Philosophy. 6th erectile dysfunction. London: Wadsworth Publishing.
