The Afl-Cio And Organized Labor ; Regeneration Essay, Research Paper

While researching this paper I came across a really interesting article. In the November 2000 issue of Reason magazine, Michael McMenamin leads with the undermentioned paragraph:

Organized labour was a one-century phenomenon. Look it up. Union members were merely 9.5 % of the private sector work force in 1999, down from a extremum of 37 % 40 old ages earlier. The last clip brotherhood rank was so low was in 1902, when the brotherhood members were 9.3 % of the private sector work force & # 8230 ; The current brotherhood leaders, led by AFL-CIO president John Sweeney, have no realistic programs to alter class. They are presiding over the concluding, terminal phase of organized labour. And they like things merely the manner they are. ( McMenamin 2000 )

This paper will try to reply the undermentioned inquiry. What are the brotherhoods making to battle this diminution in rank? It will besides discourse the assorted grounds for the diminution in rank.

The rise of labour can be attributed to cardinal alteration in the economic system, labour force, and political conditions. Around the bend of the twentieth century brotherhoods were organized about skilled trades and trades: bricklayers, pipe fitters, and carpenters. After Samuel Gompers took over as caput of the AFL, the brotherhoods rapidly began mobilising the workers in markets that had been created by the recent industrialisation. Coal, lumber, and autoworkers were shortly under the umbrella of organized labour. These non-skilled mill workers were mostly comprised of a diverse mix of immigrants, native, male and female, along with cultural and racial diverseness.

Unionization proliferated during the 1930s aided by the transition of the Wagner Act of 1935. The Wagner Act establishes the current system of unionisation in which the NLRB ( National Labor Relations Board ) supervises closed-ballot, elections held at the work topographic point for workers make up one’s minding whether of non to unionise. Harmonizing to the NLRB, by the late 1940s the AFL and CIO were winning stopping point to three fourths of their union-representation elections. The brotherhoods reached their vertex in 1954 when they represented 39 per centum of the private sector work force. ( Cornfield 1999 )

When the AFL and CIO merged in 1955 brotherhood rank had reached 17million. However, as a portion of the labour force, it had dropped to 33 per centum. ( Hurd 1998 ) The brotherhood reached its peak rank in the early 1970s at over 23 million, yet the per centum of the labour force continued to drop. By 1995 brotherhood rank was 16 million, and by 1999 the brotherhoods made up merely 9.5 per centum of the private sector work force. The diminution is rather fascinating from an organisational position.

The By-Product theory of group organisation states that big groups are non formed for lobbying intents. The group has to offer selective inducements to its members to maintain them. Lobbying is one of the byproducts of a group of people who portion a common corporate involvement. The byproduct theory seems to suit the labour brotherhoods. As does Robert Salisbury & # 8217 ; s exchange theory. The exchange theory says that involvement groups are formed as a relation between an entrepreneur/organizer who invests in a set of benefits which are offered to prospective members. If one looks at the brotherhoods as interchanging selective benefits with its members, so the nature of the benefits could indicate to the diminution in rank.

There are legion grounds offered for the steady diminution in brotherhood rank. There have been alterations in the labour Torahs of the U.S. doing it harder for brotherhoods to keep and win elections. ( Clawson 1999 ) Globalization has led to the occupations once held by brotherhood workers being moved to freshly industrialised states where labour is much cheaper. ( Borgers 1996 ) Some blame the brotherhoods themselves for a deficiency of attempt and even a deficiency of will when it comes to forming new members. A 1996 AFL-CIO study puts it the undermentioned manner, & # 8220 ; alternatively of forming, brotherhoods hunkered down & # 8221 ; and & # 8220 ; jointly chose the unforesightful scheme of seeking to protect current contracts of members alternatively of forming new members. & # 8221 ; ( AFL-CIO 2001 )

Public sentiment and its displacement off from the brotherhoods have been attributed, by some, to the diminution in rank. Harmonizing to the Gallup organisation, blessing for organized labour has ne’er fallen below 55 % ( which happened in 1979 and 1981 ) and had really risen to 65 % by 1999. Gallup besides placed organized labour aboard large concern and large authorities and asked people which one was the biggest menace to the state. In 1965 organized labour was a close second to large authorities. Labor received 29 % to large authoritiess 35 % . Organized labour as a menace steadily declined and by 1999 merely 8 % of the people viewed it as the biggest menace behind large concern at 24 % and large authorities at 65 % . ( Cornfield 1999 ) The worsening position of large labour as a menace could explicate the lifting blessing evaluations. Those who think that the brotherhoods have fallen far plenty that they are no longer a menace could offer an blessing even though they may personally disapprove of them. It is correspondent to attitude towards little communist states such as Korea and Cuba. While many do non O.K. of the manner in which the states operate, they no longer see them as a feasible menace to the democratic states.

While the public sentiment towards brotherhoods has softened in the recent old ages, brotherhoods still face a monumental undertaking in seeking to recover, or even keep rank degrees. In order to keep their current proportion of the work force, brotherhoods must form 300,000 workers a twelvemonth. In order to even get down to near the old degrees of rank, brotherhoods would hold to form at least a million new workers a twelvemonth. ( Clawson 1999 ) The inquiry is whether or non the brotherhoods, in their current signifier, will be able to do such a drastic revival, or will the image and basic constructions of the brotherhoods need to be overhauled to run into the demands of the current workers?

Before analyzing the hereafter of the brotherhoods, it is necessary to analyze the makeup of the workers in the current economic system. The American economic system has moved from a production economic system to a service economic system. Fewer and fewer people are working bluish neckband occupations where they are expected to remain in one topographic point and retire after raising two childs and paying off their mortgage. They current strain of worker is a white neckband or service type worker. They are speedy to travel to a new occupation, and are seldom loyal to a individual employer. The rise in the country of consulting has besides created a big and turning group of parttime professionals who are loyal merely for short periods of clip to those who pay their fees. One of the jobs that labour is confronting in the current market is that the labour Torahs were designed to protect those workers who full-time and long-run with a individual employer. ( AFL-CIO 2001 )

Many of today & # 8217 ; s workers have no experience with labour tactics and have non experienced the conditions, which drove many in the yesteryear to easy organisation. They understand the brotherhoods as a servicing establishment instead than a vehicle for corporate action. ( Clawson 1999 ) To set is merely, they are satisfied with their current callings and future chances and experience that the brotherhoods are non able to assist them. The expression Dv+S*C defines the status for a individual to lend in a corporate action job. Dv is the entire value of a individuals part plus the parts of others. S is the value of the selective benefits, and C is the cost of lending. For many of today & # 8217 ; s modern-day workers the costs of lending to a corporate action affecting brotherhood organisation far outweighs the benefits. In fact, many workers feel nearer to those in direction than at any clip before. Employee involvement plans such as quality circles and employee advisory commissions are leting workers to experience as if they have more of a say in direction & # 8217 ; s determinations.

The selective inducements offered by the by the brotherhoods in the yesteryear were occupation security, and safe and stable work environment, insurance, and a pension plan. Many of these selective benefits such as pension, and safe work environments have been supplied or mandated by the authorities. Most companies offer insurance so they will stay competitory in the market for good workers. In order to lure new workers into a brotherhood organisation, the nature of their benefits are traveling to hold to alter. The brotherhoods besides offer solidary benefits to its members. The chumminess among early brotherhood members was really strong. They were united for a intent, to do the working environment a better topographic point. Today & # 8217 ; s workers do non experience as near to their colleagues nor does there be the discontent towards direction to such a big extent.

When looking at the declinin

g rank from a corporate action point of view, a few different grounds for the diminution base out. Over the past 40 old ages at that place has been a proliferation in specialised involvement groups throughout the United States. Whether a individuals concern are salvaging the environment or protecting drinking H2O criterions, there is a group that they can fall in. As discussed in the old paragraph, many workers no longer experience as if the brotherhoods can assist foster their calling. The solidary benefits offered by these particular involvements can be more fulfilling to people than being a member of a brotherhood. Organized labour has been of all time progressively involved in political issues. They run publish protagonism ads and officially endorse campaigners. They besides get involved in issues that do non straight concern them. They have participated in alliances with other groups in hopes to earn the other group’s support when it is needed. For the most portion, but non ever, organized labour will tilt toward the democratic left, back uping the left’s docket.

Part of the job with this pattern is that the workers involved in the assorted brotherhoods do non all have the same political propensities or attitudes. Some workers may actively retreat from the brotherhood because of this job. However, others may desire to back up a corporate action that is much more focussed. Harmonizing to the IRS, the mean brotherhood dues per month are $ 19. ( IRS 2001 ) The mean monthly dues for an environmental organisation are $ 23.50. ( Johnson 1998 ) Possibly the brotherhood members, who feel that the brotherhood is non playing a large portion in progressing their calling or advancing their specific involvements, would instead give money to a smaller, more specialised group.

Some have a blue mentality when it comes to the hereafter of brotherhoods & # 8217 ; benefits. Kenneth Sheets calls the tendency toward new benefits & # 8220 ; bottom fishing and gimmicks. & # 8221 ; ( Sheets 1990 ) The brotherhoods have experimented with recognition cards, money markets, and English lessons as a manner to lure new members and retain existing 1s. They have besides offered auxiliary plans such as life insurance, legal services, and mail order prescription programs to the members. ( Sheets 1990 )

The brotherhoods have besides attempted to form countries that they have appeared to be antecedently unconcerned with. More attempts toward organisation of authorities workers and the ever-growing service industry have shown nominal consequences. The big pool of migratory farm workers offers possible, and jobs for the brotherhoods. The huge bulk of the migratory workers are unorganised and work in deficient conditions. The field would look to be mature for organisation by the brotherhoods. However, the nature of the industry has slowed brotherhood promotion. ( Lipset 1996 ) The migratory workers are comprised of a big figure of illegal foreigners who are non willing to pull any attending to themselves. Besides, the legal workers are fearful that if they organize and upset the employers, they will be replaced by illegals who will be less disposed to kick.

Part of the ground for the diminution of the rank in the brotherhoods is the worsening effectivity of the work stoppage. The work stoppage has been the paradigm of corporate action by brotherhoods in the yesteryear. The work stoppage procedure was challenged when employers began taking the violative. ( Clawson 1999 ) The Union busting by the companies involved engaging strikebreaker to reconstruct production and interrupt the brotherhood down by abrasion. The effectivity of the brotherhoods to strike make a low point in 1981 when Ronald Reagan fired the air traffic accountants, who struck despite holding a no work stoppage clause in their contract.

With the diminution in the effectivity of the work stoppage, many brotherhoods focused their attending on happening and developing alternate beginnings of power. The stance of the brotherhoods seemed to be ; if we can non ache the company by striking entirely, we will use aid and ache them in other ways. One pattern used was called the & # 8220 ; corporate run & # 8221 ; . The corporate run was an effort to influence investors, loaners, clients, providers, and shareholders into seting force per unit area on the employer. ( Hurd 1998 ) Besides used in this effort to use force per unit area were authorities regulative bureaus, elected functionaries, and community Alliess. The external force per unit area was to increase the cost of the employer & # 8217 ; s opposition and do them more likely to settle.

Another country the brotherhoods have tried to reform or reconstitute their theoretical account is in the country of forming. Because of the deficiency of fright of, and even ill will towards the brotherhoods by some employers, and & # 8220 ; because the jurisprudence permits employers to actively step in in the election procedure, the fact that a bulk of workers at a given site want representation is no longer plenty to accomplish certification. & # 8221 ; ( Clawson 1999 ) This happens despite the purpose of federal labour Torahs prefering the unions & # 8217 ; . In order to concentrate more attending of forming, the AFL-CIO created the Organizing Institute.

The OI was created to develop people, including many recent college alumnuss, to be organisers. ( Foerster 1996 ) OI developing focused on holding the organisers visit the workers in their places. The OI workers are professional organisers who act as soldier of fortunes, traveling from one location to the following wherever they are needed. Another manner to prepare perspective members is by giving out associate ranks. A brotherhood worker may hold a friend who works for a non-union company, but is interested in the brotherhood. The friend may have an associate rank, leting them to go to brotherhood meetings and have entree to brotherhood organisers. The theory is that they will distribute the word to their colleagues and a pro-union attitude will develop before the brotherhood even expresses involvement to the employer about forming. ( Foerster 1996 )

The nature of workers, employers, and dealingss between the two has changed. The alteration from an industrial to a service economic system has limited the possible per centum of & # 8220 ; well-paid & # 8221 ; workers that the brotherhoods can form. There is a huge sum of fast nutrient and other low paid service industry workers that are available for forming, but how feasible of an option is it? The construction of a brotherhood is modeled for an employee that stays at one occupation for a long clip. Very few people retire from McDonalds as caput frier operator. The possible brotherhood workers in this country do non see their occupation as lasting, but as a measure up the ladder or entry-level place. Once they have climbed a few rounds on the ladder they will non experience as if the brotherhood can assist them.

The brotherhoods have easy moved from a theoretical account that was born out of demand, to a theoretical account that more resembles a servicing organisation. The workers of today no longer see the brotherhoods as the reply to their jobs ; if in act, they notice them at all. The cost of lending to an organized labour theoretical account seems to be far outweighing the benefits of rank for most modern-day workers. It is dubious, given the current economic tendencies, that organized labour will of all time return to their glory yearss of the 1950ss. For now, it seems the best that organized labour can trust for is overcome the dinosaur image and hope to be needed once more.

AFL-CIO Home page. 15Apr. 2001 *http: //www.afl-cio.org* .

Borgers, F. & # 8220 ; The challenges of economic globalisation for U.S. labor. & # 8221 ; Critical Society 22

( 1996 ) : 67-88.

Clawson, Dan. Clawson, Mary Ann. & # 8220 ; What has happened to the US labour motion? & # 8221 ;

Annual Review of Sociology. ( 1999 ) : 95-134.

Cornfield, Daniel. & # 8220 ; Shifts in Public Approval of Labor Unions in the United States. & # 8221 ; Gallup

Organization. 15 Apr 2001 *http: //www.gallup.com* .

Foerster, A. & # 8220 ; Don & # 8217 ; t whimper. Form! & # 8221 ; Presented at Annual Meeting Am. Soc. Assoc. New York,

1996.

Hurd, Richard. & # 8220 ; Contesting the dinosaur image: the labour motion & # 8217 ; s hunt for a future. & # 8221 ;

Labor Studies Journal 22 ( 1998 ) : 5-32.

Internal Revenue Service. Home page. 12Apr. 2001 *http: //www.irs.gov* .

Johnson, Paul. & # 8220 ; Organized labour in an epoch of bluish neckband decline. & # 8221 ; Interest Group Politics 3rd

Edition. Ed. Burdett Loomis. Allan Cigler. Washington, D.C. : CQ Press, 1991. 33-60.

Johnson, Paul. & # 8220 ; Interest group recruiting: finding members and maintaining them. & # 8221 ; Interest Group

Politicss 5th Edition. Ed. Burdett Loomis. Allan Cigler. Washington, D.C. : CQ Press, 1998.

35-62.

Lipset, Seymour. Unions in Transition. San Francisco: ICS Press, 1986.

McMenamin, Micheal. & # 8220 ; Labor Lost: worsening influence of labour unions. & # 8221 ; Reason Nov. 2000:

47-57.

Sheets, Kenneth. & # 8220 ; Labor & # 8217 ; s docket for the & # 8216 ; 90s ; catchs and underside fishing & # 8217 ; may non hold the

decline. & # 8221 ; U.S. News & A ; World Report Mar. 1990: 37-41.