& # 8217 ; s Case Essay, Research Paper

While reading this instance I couldn? T believe how similar Craig? s job was to my ain from twosome old ages ago. I tried to remember all the facts from my ain experience and compare them to Craig? s. Even though I ne’er had a steady occupation and I worked merely twosome of summers, I am pretty certain that many people had experience like this at one point in their callings. Every individual in the universe is different, and I believe that each individual would act otherwise in this instance. To be just possibly the result would be the same in some cases, but the determination procedure would be alone to every person. This is where ethics come into the drama, harmonizing to this term everyone should move the same in any given state of affairs.

Craig is confronting really serious determination, merely like in Shakespeare? s Hamlet? to be or non to be? He is to take between his physical well being and his scruples. Harmonizing to Hobbes, in human? s nature is to be egoist, and one should ever look out for one? s best involvement, in this instance maintain the occupation and alumnus from college. On the other side there are many stakeholders depending on the determination he will do, and harmonizing to the definition of moralss, it is non about me, it is about others. Clearly, systematically with the definition Craig is non confronting a quandary but a definite pick? to talk out for himself and the clients that are depending on his determination. Craig must non subscribe the rating sheet and must make the merely right and ethical thing. He must take this issue to the top direction and complain about the wrongfulness of the old actions of his higher-ups. If he is threatened with his tuition reimbursement and even if his occupation is on the line, he must continue with his purposes and travel to the governments that are responsible for such instances.

Craig? s responsibilities and duties in this instance are legion. Harmonizing to the text, there are seven basic responsibilities for good and bad behavior. One must maintain explicit and inexplicit promises, where Craig must maintain promises given to himself, company, and his clients. For illustration he must maintain the inexplicit promise given to the clients where he is to make what is in his power to protect their best involvement. One must do certain that the goods are distributed rightly, where in this instance merely a half twelve out of 100s have been acted upon. One must non harm others, where Craig by non moving instantly is harming some policyholders w

Ho can non afford other agencies of attention or whatever the policy stated in the first topographic point. ( Trunfio, 28-29 )

There are many moral common sense rules that are addressed and violated in this instance. The most obvious one would be lawfulness, where is stated that the Torahs must be obeyed, and clearly in this case it is non so. Besides, Human worth rule is violated, where his director is obviously harming Craig. ( Trunfio, 24 ) Craig? s director Nancy, intentionally or non, is non esteeming him as a human being and is forcing him to make what he is told, non what is right and legal. My sentiment is that Craig? s foreman Nancy knows the state of affairs, and is intentionally reassigning the duty on Craig? s shoulders. These are merely twosome of moral rules being addressed in this instance.

The fact that the actions of this house are non legal is likely adequate for Craig to describe this instance to the governments. If he doesn? t act instantly many clients of the house will be damaged. Furthermore this could take to a case which could damage the well-being of many employees of the house every bit good as their agents all over the United States. If he ignores the issue, and I must add that this is non merely a minor defect or misidentify but illegal act that will finally be discovered by the governments, the consequences would be the same, he would free his scholarship and his occupation and he would perchance be held lawfully accountable for non moving upon these affairs. This fact should be an oculus opener for Craig, in sense that if he doesn? T act the result is traveling to be the same as in instance he reports the errors of the company, the lone difference is that in latter instance he would be moving ethically. If Craig attempts to rectify the state of affairs he would most decidedly lose his occupation and his scholarship, and would be given the name? whistle blower. However that is nil compared to the name such as unethical or immoral. From the reading I could feel that Craig knows what to make and what will be the best for him. I think he is an ethical individual, and he will make the right thing and unclutter his name by describing the state of affairs to the top direction or proper governments. My household comes from little Montenegrin state and there is one stating that is most prevailing at that place and provinces, & # 8220 ; It is better to lose life than to lose face & # 8221 ; . In this instance Craig might merely lose his occupation and scholarship but one time when you lose your face it impossible to acquire it back.