The quandary that Ms. Lee faces is non easy to decide. There are assorted factors to see in finding what the best action to take is. This is the primary point of contention in the scenario? Ms. Lee faces the inquiry of what is the morally and ethically sound determination to do.

The pick that Ms. Lee would do would find whether Rose lives or dies. This is so a major ethical quandary. Are certain instructions plenty to formalize the loss of a child’s life? This

Ms. Lee must do choose between two options. The first option is to honour Rose’s parent’s petition that Rose would non be resuscitated in the event of a ictus. The other is for Ms. Lee to supply medical aid to Rose despite of the parents’ orders. Each of the picks nowadayss certain rules that need to be taken into consideration.

Ms. Lee’s first option is to follow the instructions of Rose’s parents. This option would intend that Ms. Lee would travel against her ain rule and belief that every kid has the right to populate a full life regardless of any disablement. Furthermore. such move will travel against the institution’s policy that medical aid must be provided to any kid whenever necessary and possible.

The other option for Ms. Lee is to supply Rose with CPR. However. such class of action will travel against the specific instructions that Rose’s parents gave. In fact. Rose’s parents submitted a formal notice to the principal of the school informing them of such determination. By giving Rose CPR. Ms. Lee will disobey the orders stated in the formal notice. Furthermore. Ms. Lee may besides do further jobs for Rose’s parents who are holding a hard clip doing terminals meet and supplying for their other kids.

The quandary is a instance of what ethical logical thinking to follow. The solution to the instance will depend on what type of moralss is to be applied. The undermentioned subdivision will discourse to possible schools of moralss that possibly applied in finding the solution to Ms. Lee’s quandary.

Consequentialism

Consequentialism is a group of moral theories that consider merely the effects of actions. Although consequentialism can be applied at assorted degrees. the most outstanding usage of such normative belongingss is to find how morally right the act is. What this means is that consequetialism is normally applied to instances wherein the morality of a certain action is being considered. Furthermore. consequentialism suggests that the moral position of a certain act is dependent on the goodness or badness of the effects of the action. Harmonizing to Fesser ( ) . a consequentialist believes that. “An action is morally right if the effects of that action are more favourable than unfavourable. ”

There are several ethical theories that autumn under the consequentialist attack. One of such theories is ulitarianism. This type of consequentialism suggests that determinations should be made by utilizing a cost-benefit analysis. Furthermore. an of import rule of utilitarianism is that the action must be good to everyone or to the bulk. Harmonizing to Carter ( 2002 ) :

A normally recognized useful concretion for finding an action’s moral acceptableness is ; “the greatest felicity for the greatest figure. ” Thus. a consequentialist would typically try to cipher the effects or result of a determination and if the benefits of the result are outweighed by the hazards of either non executing the action or executing some other action. so the action is considered as morally desirable.

When these rules are applied to Ms. Lee’s quandary. it is apparent that Ms. Lee must take to follow the order of Rose’s parents. Weighing the benefits of taking to follow the instructions against the hazards of making so will uncover that more people will profit from the determination.

Since Rose’s parents have admitted that they are fighting to go on to supply their kids with their demands. following their instructions will let Rose’s parents to supply a better life for all their other kids. Following the expression suggested by Carter ( 2002 ) . “the greatest felicity for the greatest figure. ” Ms. Lee will be led to a determination where she must stay by the instructions of Rose’s parents for such move will profit a greater figure of people.

Virtue Ethical motives

Another type or signifier of normative moralss is virtue moralss. This signifier of moralss topographic points accent on the virtuousnesss or moral character of the individual. Applying virtuousness moralss will intend that every action must be analyzed on the footing of what virtuousness will ensue from it. Furthermore. virtuousness moralss requires an single to reply the inquiry. “how should I populate? ” The reply to such inquiry is that one must populate with a virtuous character.

Character is a critical construct in virtuousness moralss. The construct of character in virtuousness moralss is based on Aristotlean character. Athanassoulis ( 2006 ) provinces:

“Aristotelian character is. significantly. about a province of being. It’s about holding the appropriate inner states… Aristotelian theory is a theory of action. since holding the virtuous inner temperaments will besides affect being moved to move in conformity with them. Recognizing that kindness is the appropriate response to a state of affairs and experiencing suitably kindly disposed will besides take to a corresponding effort to move kindly. ”

Besides. virtuousness moralss suggests that character traits are stable and fixed. Meaning. when a individual possesses a certain trait. he is expected to show such trait in all scenarios even there are times that he will happen it hard to make so.

When applied to declaration of Ms. Lee’s ethical quandary. one must see the character traits that she possesses. Ms. Lee is known to be compassionate and caring particularly to immature kids. Therefore. when she sees a kid or individual in demand. she provides aid in any manner possible.

One manner to decide the issue is for Ms. Lee to keep her compassionate nature as prescribed by virtuousness moralss. Although it may be hard to make so. owing to the fact that standing orders have been made non to revive Rose. Ms. Lee is still expected to use compassion since it is in her character. Furthermore. one can see the state of affairs from the position that one is ought to populate pityingly which would intend that Ms. Lee ought to supply medical aid to Rise when she needs it. It is deemed to be morally incorrect for Ms. Lee to go forth Rose be as it is non the manner that Ms. Lee should populate her life.

Resolution of the Dilemma

I believe that in Ms. Lee’s instance. virtuousness and character must predominate over effects. It is my personal belief that much of what is ethically right is based on the virtuousnesss and traits that one exercises when moving or make up one’s minding.

In the instance of Ms. Lee. I believe that even before the event occurred. she already knew how she wanted to populate her life. It is the same ground why she believed that every kid. regardless of disablement. has the right to populate a full life. Such belief of hers demonstrates her character and virtuousness of being compassionate. Furthermore. her determination to work in an SSP school shows that she wants to populate a life of compassion particularly for kids who have particular demands. Therefore. it is expected that she continues to show such character trait despite the trouble of the circumstance.

Using virtuousness moralss as the footing of the declaration. I find that I am more inclined to assisting Rose despite the “do non resuscitate” orders of her parents. Merely watching person dice is non the manner one should populate her life. Watching Rose prevarication impotently on the floor does non demo compassion. It is in assisting Rose that Ms. Lee would populate a virtuous life. a life of compassion and service to others.

Mention:

Athanassoulis. N. ( 2006 ) . “Virtue Ethics. ”The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Retrieved 18 June 2007 from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. iep. utm. edu/v/virtue. htm # SH3c.

Carter. L. ( 2002 ) .A primer to ethical analysis.Office of Public Policy and Ethical motives

Institute for Molecular Bioscience. The University of Queensland. Australia. Retrieved 18 June 2007 from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. uq. edu. au/oppe.

Fieser. J. ( 2006 ) . “Ethics. ”The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Retrieved 18 June 2007 from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. iep. utm. edu/e/ethics. htm.

Sinnott-Armstrong. W. ( 2007 ) . “Consequentialism” .The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Retrieved 18 June 2007 from:hypertext transfer protocol: //plato. Stanford. edu/archives/spr2007/entries/consequentialism/ .