The Hamlet Paradigm Essay, Research Paper
Cardinal Question of the Play
How does an single react when he develops an compulsion with destructing the powerful force governing his state, yet risks sing psychological alienation, happening at multiple degrees within himself, if he attempts to destruct that force? This is the cardinal inquiry that Shakespeare explores in his drama Hamlet, which is a character survey of an single harboring merely such an compulsion, implying merely such a hazard.
Introduction
That Hamlet is obsessed with destructing the powerful force governing his state ( Claudius ) is plainly apparent in the drama. But while this compulsion initiates Hamlet & # 8217 ; s behaviour, it is his extra realisation, that he risks psychological alienation happening on multiple degrees as a consequence of seeking to transport out his compulsion, that shapes his behaviour into the signifier that the audience sees, one that seems eccentric and inexplicable.
The Nature of Hamlet & # 8217 ; s Compulsion
The grounds for Hamlet & # 8217 ; s compulsion with demanding retaliation against Claudius are reasonably straightforward. The shade of Hamlet Sr. informed Hamlet that Claudius killed Hamlet Sr. and therefore usurped him from his throne. In making so, he emasculated Hamlet by robbing him of his cardinal function theoretical account of maleness, viz. his male parent. He besides committed the moral and political wickedness of regicide, and the familial wickedness of killing his brother and later kiping with his married woman. Claudius besides deprived Hamlet of his rightful kingship, since Hamlet was 2nd in line after Hamlet Sr. In add-on, Hamlet now knows that his love of his female parent is corrupted since she is fond towards his castrating enemy.
The Nature of Hamlet & # 8217 ; s Risk of Psychological Estrangement
In trying to kill Claudius, Hamlet risks digesting estrangement happening within his ego at multiple psychological degrees. There are chiefly five such degrees of alienation:
1. Religious alienation: Hamlet feels self-actualized from following basic spiritual rules of life. This is shown by his plaint that the everlasting had fixed his cannon against self-slaughter, therefore forestalling Hamlet from perpetrating self-destruction at a clip when he felt like making so. If Hamlet were to kill Claudius, he would be go againsting a cardinal spiritual rule against slaying another human being. This would do him experience guilt at holding violated spiritual finale, therefore stand foring alienation at the degree of his spiritual consciousness.
2. Moral alienation: Hamlet is besides principled in a moral, or more by and large a normative, sense. To kill a male monarch would intend go againsting his internal strong belief against perpetrating offenses that might harm the hierarchal order of a province & # 8217 ; s authorities. His by and large principled nature is shown by his refusal to garner together a rabble to throw out Claudius, as Laertes efforts to make subsequently in the drama, even though he knew that he had the ability to make so. The fact that he knew this is shown by the fact that Claudius explicitly knew this of Hamlet. One may safely presume that Hamlet & # 8217 ; s apprehension of how political relations works is virtually indistinguishable to that of Claudius and Hamlet Sr. The general similarity in how these blood relations think and feel emerges from both of them professing their psychological trust on Gertrude & # 8217 ; s support of them.
3. Alienation from countrymen: It is true that Hamlet has both the capacity to form a rabble of protagonists to subvert Claudius and is loved by most of his countrymen ( to the point where, as Claudius admits, Claudius can non openly think, feel or act in a hostile mode towards Hamlet ) . However, Hamlet is unable to form such a rabble for this intent due to his principled nature, which prohibits him from making so. Without this option, the lone manner for him to revenge his male parent & # 8217 ; s decease is by himself entirely taking action against Claudius. Basically, so, he is one adult male up against a male monarch and his ground forces of soldiers, undercover agents and friends. Against such odds, he faces the serious hazard that castle machination could work against him. A leery Claudius could, for illustration, have some of Hamlet & # 8217 ; s co-workers in the royal family go out and descry on him, or assassinate him. Therefore, in trying to kill Claudius, Hamlet risks alienation in the signifier of his former co-workers of the royal family turning against him. Claudius could besides hold some of Hamlet & # 8217 ; s friends seek to kill him. This represents Hamlet & # 8217 ; s hazard of experiencing alienation from holding his former friends turn against him. Besides, Hamlet & # 8217 ; s friends and co-workers do non cognize why Claudius deserves executing ; they have no cognition of his offense, and Hamlet either lacks the cogent evidence or the nervus to inform them of the offense. Therefore, in seeking to kill Claudius, Hamlet faces an estranging sense of malaise from prosecuting in an enterprise of which his friends and co-workers feel is soberly immoral and unacceptable.
4. Alienation from his Mother: This is likely the most of import signifier of alienation that Hamlet hazards experiencing in trying to kill Claudius. There are several points to be said about this. In order to kill Claudius, Hamlet must, of class, recognize that Claudius killed his male parent. In making so, nevertheless, he must besides recognize the self-unsettling fact that his female parent inadvertently fell in love with such a vile adult male, a adult male who non merely is immoral but has successfully emasculated Hamlet by killing his male parent. In killing Claudius he besides risks alienation from her, since she might everlastingly see Hamlet as the adult male who killed her lover and a merely male monarch. After all, she might ne’er believe in Claudius & # 8217 ; guilt, either from Hamlet non being able to convert her of his guilt, or because a sense of psychological denial might forestall her from recognizing this fact about Claudius. And even if she does recognize it, she will experience hurt. Just as Claudius and Hamlet Sr. feel pained by Gertrude & # 8217 ; s injury, so would Hamlet, who as a blood relation to the other work forces thinks and feels likewise to them. For this ground, Hamlet feels inhibited from intentionally destructing the adult male his beloved female parent loves. There is besides the chance that a leery Claudius could act upon a naif Gertrude to detest Hamlet, or to O.K. of or to back up castle machination against the possible bravo. In this instance, Hamlet would experience the dual sting of his female parent, who one time loved him, going both his enemy and Claudius & # 8217 ; protagonist. Another signifier of motherly alienation that Hamlet would experience from killing Claudius would ensue from him beliing his female parent & # 8217 ; s outlook of what his personality is like. Gertrude believes that Hamlet is & # 8220 ; sweet. & # 8221 ; But by killing Claudius, Hamlet would be barbarous. This would upset her self-actualizing construct of the nature of Hamlet & # 8217 ; s personality, and the realisation that this perturbation has occurred would be to Hamlet a beginning of psychological alienation.
5. Alienation from adult females in general: Merely as Hamlet & # 8217 ; s countrymen and co-workers might turn against him as a consequence of castle machination, so could his lover, Ophelia. In add-on, in recognizing the fact of Claudius & # 8217 ; offense ( which he must make in order to revenge his male parent & # 8217 ; s slaying ) , he realizes some & # 8220 ; facts & # 8221 ; about adult females that disturb him. Specifically, the & # 8220 ; facts & # 8221 ; that Hamlet realizes are that adult females might, because of their emotional features, inadvertently commit serious, immoral errors and that adult females put on work forces psychological force per unit areas that can interfere with work forces & # 8217 ; s ability to make what is morally right. Gertrude & # 8217 ; s marrying of Claudius the liquidator, every bit good as how her psychological impact on Hamlet & # 8217 ; s head hinders his ability to kill Claudius, are manifestations of these facts. These facts disturb him by doing him experience weary and estranged of adult females & # 8217 ; emotional failings, which in bend make him experience weary of adult females in general. That fatigue of adult females threatens his sense of self-actualization, because it is much more hard for him to transport on a normal sex life if he feels estranged by adult females in general ; a heterosexual adult male who is unable to transport on a normal sex life with adult females feels anti-self-actualized.
Taken together, these five illustrate the hazard Hamlet faces that, in trying to kill Claudius, he will probably see psychological alienation happening on multiple degrees. He would experience alienation of his bond of maternally love, his bond of womanly love, his bond of friendly relationship, his bondage to his spiritual and normative rules, and his bond to his professional co-workers. So many different signifiers of alienation happening at the same time would wholly destruct his psychological sense of individuality. The realisation that he faces such tremendous force per unit areas shapes his apparently eccentric behaviour in the drama, and makes him fight against the amazing weight of his duty to destruct Claudius. All of this, of class, is in add-on to his basic fright of being executed if his efforts at killing Claudius travel amiss.
The Nature of Hamlet & # 8217 ; s Thought Process
After the shade informs Hamlet of Claudius & # 8217 ; offense, Hamlet realizes that he is in a catch-22 state of affairs psychologically. If he does non kill Claudius, he may everlastingly be locked in the distressingly nerve-racking mental province in which his compulsion puts him. But if he attempts or succeeds in killing Claudius, he risks sing psychological alienation so intense that it could destruct his sense of individuality. Whether he does or doesn & # 8217 ; t kill Claudius, he faces tremendous psychological hurting.
Why He Feigns Insanity
Hamlet feigns insanity because it allows him to make several things that he otherwise would be unable to make:
With regard to Ophelia, Hamlet would wish to show his intense, uncontrollable choler towards her without originating intuition in her or in others that he is in a hostile rational mental province. This would assist forestall others in the royal family from theorizing that Hamlet was rationally be aftering hostile actions such as killing Claudius. ( The specific nature of this choler will be discussed subsequently ) .
With Gertrude, Hamlet would besides wish to show his choler towards her, every bit good as perchance kill her or do her spell insane, without originating intuition in others that he possesses a hostile rational mental province. In add-on, he would wish to face Gertrude with the premises of Claudius & # 8217 ; offense, without her thought that he really believes in them, so that she might someway believe about them and recognize that Claudius is guilty. Therefore, she will no longer love Claudius ( therefore supplying Hamlet with the psychological freedom he needs to kill him ) and she will non believe that Hamlet believes that Claudius is guilty. If she believes this, she might intentionally or unwittingly pass on this fact to others, taking to Hamlet & # 8217 ; s death. Besides, nevertheless, Hamlet does non desire to face Gertrude with the offense in a rational manner, therefore coercing her to do a hard pick between Hamlet and Claudius, with black psychological consequences for Hamlet if she chooses against him.
With regard to friends or co-workers, Hamlet would wish to show his choler towards them without originating intuition that he is in a hostile rational mental province. He besides wants to be able to penalize them or ache them for back uping or potentially encouraging Claudius, while traveling free on footing of insanity.
Feigning insanity besides allows him to show his choler towards Claudius, while anticipating indulgent intervention.
Why He Stages the Play
Hamlet & # 8217 ; s determination to present a drama in order to & # 8220 ; catch the scruples of the King & # 8221 ; consequences from his compulsion with garnering information about whether or non Claudius & # 8217 ; committed the offense. Why is Hamlet & # 8220 ; obsessed & # 8221 ; with making this, as opposed to simply being & # 8220 ; interested & # 8221 ; in garnering such information? The ground is that whatever Hamlet learns from such information, that is, whether it proves or disproves Claudius & # 8217 ; guilt, Hamlet will experience great psychological alleviation from the information.
If he disproves to himself that Claudius killed the male monarch, so Hamlet will be immediately relieved of his compulsion to kill Claudius, along with the intense psychological emphasis it induces within him. At worst, he will still experience the significant but much more manageable emphasis he felt, before he met the shade, from his response to his female parent & # 8217 ; s over-hasty matrimony to Claudius.
In add-on, turn outing that Claudius is guilty has great psychological advantages for Hamlet. For one thing, such cogent evidence will turn out to him that his enterprise to kill Claudius is justified. Therefore, he will non be prosecuting in his risky, unsafe project for no ground. Such cogent evidence will besides save a principled Hamlet from the agonising possibility of prosecuting in a offense that violates many moral, political and spiritual rules if it is non justified. Such cogent evidence will besides warrant Hamlet & # 8217 ; s interior care of the painful sense of bitterness he feels towards Claudius, Gertrude and others within the royal family. It will besides supply Hamlet with the chance to utilize difficult grounds to turn out to his friends and loved 1s that Claudius is guilty. This might do them back up Hamlet in his enterprise, therefore supplying him with the psychological support he needs to transport it out.
Therefore, confuting the shade & # 8217 ; s message promises Hamlet instant alleviation from his hurting, and turn outing this message will foster him by enabling him to warrant his compulsion and to perchance utilize such cogent evidence as a agency of geting peer support of his enterprise. From Hamlet & # 8217 ; s psychological point of view, so, obtaining farther information about whether or non the shade was true to his word is a win-win project.
Why Hamlet Berates Ophelia
Hamlet ( see estrangement # 5 above ) sees in his female parent a manifestation of the premiss that an unreflective adult female, guided by her emotions, might through her actions inflict great emphasis upon work forces. At the same clip, such a adult female might unwittingly do it really hard for such work forces to cover with that emphasis. The outrageousness of the emphasis that Gertrude puts upon Hamlet makes Hamlet develop a significant bitterness towards her. Since to Hamlet, Gertrude embodies the failings of adult females in general, Hamlet & # 8217 ; s bitterness towards Gertrude is besides projected against adult females in general. Normally, Hamlet would non greatly resent adult females,
but since in this instance they have cornered him into an highly nerve-racking state of affairs, he becomes exasperated. In his province of emphasis, the junior-grade bitternesss he might hold antecedently harbored towards adult female for their “mercurial” emotional nature turns into a fully fledged bitterness or hatred.
This explains why Hamlet berates Ophelia to the point of driving her insane and towards her ill-timed decease. Ophelia serves as a punching bag, stand foring adult females in general, which Hamlet onslaughts as an mercantile establishment for his general bitterness of adult females. He besides attacks her as an mercantile establishment in general for the enormous emphasis his compulsion causes within him. She is a convenient mark because, being a adult female who loves him, she does non contend back against Hamlet ( in add-on, Hamlet & # 8217 ; s insanity besides prevents her from making so ) . In add-on, the straining of his love bond towards Ophelia, although a signifier of alienation, helps to pre-empt the even greater psychological hurting that he would digest if she were to turn against him from cognition of his compulsion. After all, if the love between them were weakened, the impact of that sort of love rejection followed by her support of Claudius would be lessened. And, of class, this behaviour is an first-class agencies of making the feeling of insanity. Besides, nevertheless, such rejection, by extinguishing love from his consciousness, may indurate his personality to the point where he is better able to detest Claudius and to demand retaliation against him.
Why He Treats Gertrude the Way He Does
Hamlet wants to accomplish two ends with regard to Gertrude. One is to show his choler against her, which he harbors for basically the same grounds that he had it for Ophelia. Two is to somehow bring on her to halt loving Claudius. This latter development would extinguish the possibility that Hamlet might experience alienation from motherly love in trying to kill or from wining in killing Claudius. After all, in killing Claudius, Hamlet would non be killing the adult male his beloved female parent loves. Gertrude would besides non condemn Hamlet for killing or trying to kill Claudius if she did non love Claudius. Thus, Hamlet would hold the psychological freedom he would necessitate to kill Claudius and therefore alleviate him of his compulsion
Hamlet meets end one by handling Gertrude angrily, as his feigned insanity permits him to make.
However, end two is unquestionably more hard. One means of accomplishing it would be for Hamlet to kill his female parent or do her spell insane, which he has the licence to make thanks to his feigned insanity. Therefore, she would halt loving Claudius. However, he can non make so because he harbors a basic psychological suppression against destructing his ain female parent. Besides, he needs his female parent & # 8217 ; s love much more than he needs Ophelia & # 8217 ; s love. While Ophelia & # 8217 ; s love is self-actualizing since it is a lover & # 8217 ; s love, Gertrude & # 8217 ; s love is much more self-actualizing and indispensable for him since it is that of his female parent. ( The grounds for this arbitrary trust on his female parent & # 8217 ; s love comes from his male parent and Claudius both profession of their powerful demand for Gertrude & # 8217 ; s love and approval.. Hamlet, being their blood relation, will probably experience the same ) . To destruct his female parent would be to assail his ain individuality.
Therefore, since Hamlet can non bring on his female parent to halt loving Claudius by killing her or driving her insane, as he did with Ophelia, he must somehow convey about this arrest while go forthing her alive and sane. He attempts to make this by facing his female parent with the premises of Claudius & # 8217 ; offense, in the hopes that she will somehow believe about them, recognize that Claudius is guilty, and therefore halt loving Cladius, all without believing that Hamlet believes these premises on the interior. Normally, Hamlet would non make this because in facing her with these premises he would be compeling her to take between he and Claudius, a determination that would be psychologically black for Hamlet if she chose against him. However, since Hamlet confronts her with these premises in a province of feigned insanity, she has no ground to believe that the rational Hamlet believes them on the interior. Therefore, she will non be obliged to do that hard pick because the fortunes that would do that duty, viz. her realisation that the rational Hamlet believes in them and that she knows that he knows that she knows he believes in them, wear & # 8217 ; t be, thanks to Hamlet & # 8217 ; s feigned insanity.
Ultimately, even this effort fails. Gertrude fails to react to these premises with acknowledgment of them and a subsequent decision that she no longer loves Claudius. What happens following?
Why He Procrastinates
Hamlet procrastinates in the drama, such as during the drawn-out Players & # 8217 ; scene or during the clown & # 8217 ; s graveyard scene, for the indispensable ground that his psychological feelings confound his ability to face his fate. He finds it really hard to make up one’s mind whether to kill Claudius or allow him be, due to his catch-22 psychological state of affairs.
The Play & # 8217 ; s Ending in Light of the Preceding Discussion
The penultimate determination that Hamlet makes with respect to Claudius is to non kill Claudius, but to allow Claudius be and allow destiny and Godhead forces take over his amazing duty. He makes this determination chiefly as a agency of rapidly get awaying the intense psychological emphasis under which he finds himself and, alternatively, come ining the much more psychologically peaceable province of earthly denial. Although this ground may look arbitrary, Shakespeare clearly emphasizes the importance of such a motive to get away hurting, per Se, in Hamlet & # 8217 ; s decision-making. He does so by stressing the Player & # 8217 ; s scene, which, although it does non expeditiously progress the secret plan, emphasizes that Hamlet is obsessed with garnering information about Claudius, and hence that Hamlet is obsessed with confuting Claudius & # 8217 ; guilt. The concrete advantage of confuting such guilt is that it rapidly resolves Hamlet & # 8217 ; s hurting, therefore demoing that the sheer motive to get away the hurting of his compulsion is outstanding in Hamlet & # 8217 ; s decision-making concretion. Escaping in denial besides seems to be Hamlet & # 8217 ; s best option at this point since, holding antecedently confronted Gertrude with the premises of Claudius & # 8217 ; offense, she seemingly failed to react to these premises with acknowledgment of them and contempt for Claudius.
Ultimately, of class, Hamlet decides to kill Claudius. He does so for a assortment of grounds. Most significantly, his female parent, in imbibing Claudius & # 8217 ; imbibe and therefore poisoning herself, becomes witting of Claudius & # 8217 ; perfidy. She communicates her cognition of this to Hamlet ( & # 8220 ; The Drink, the drink, I am poisoined & # 8221 ; ) and therefore her implied backdown of all support of Claudius. This eliminates the menace of motherly alienation, virtually paving the manner for Hamlet to kill Claudius. Besides, nevertheless, Laertes informs Hamlet of his cognition of Claudius & # 8217 ; perfidy in the really end, every bit good as his antipathy for Claudius, therefore taking the menace of friend alienation. Previously, every bit good, Hamlet had shown Horatio the cogent evidence of Claudius & # 8217 ; perfidy, therefore farther pacifying this type of estrangement menace. In add-on, Claudius & # 8217 ; perfidy is itself immoral, therefore warranting Hamlet to kill him on rule. Besides, the convenience and abruptness by which Hamlet came upon his chance to kill Claudius ( Claudius prepared the toxicant, arms, puting, etc. ) allowed Hamlet to kill Claudius on impulse, therefore saving him of possible indecision that protracted consideration might do him. Finally, since Hamlet was mortally wounded, he had nil to lose.
Brief remarks on Other Plot Developments
1. The likely dramatic intent of demoing Hamlet in the stagnation prior to cognizing of his male parent & # 8217 ; s slaying is to impart credibleness to the thought that Hamlet & # 8217 ; s compulsion causes him intense psychological emphasis. After all, one might conceive of that if Hamlet could acquire this down before hearing of his male parent & # 8217 ; s slaying, he would probably go highly edgy one time he learns of his slaying.
2. In theory, Hamlet could hold killed Claudius while shaming insanity. Therefore, he would get away alienation, because his people would fault his action on his insanity, non on malicious purpose. He does non make this, nevertheless, because he is subconsciously inhibited from intentionally killing the adult male whom his beloved female parent loves. When he lunges at Polonius behind the drape, believing that the individual behind the drape might hold been Claudius, he does non cognize precisely who is behind the drape and therefore, had he killed Claudius, he could non hold done so intentionally.
3. Although Hamlet feigns insanity in order to throw off intuition of his true, hostile purposes to kill Claudius, there is one individual who sees through them, viz. Claudius. One might believe, that since Hamlet thinks like Claudius, that Hamlet would non believe that shaming insanity will throw off intuition, since he knows that Claudius will finally harbour that intuition. This is true, but one must maintain in head the term & # 8220 ; eventually. & # 8221 ; Hamlet knew that Claudius would non harbour this intuition until subsequently ( as opposed to instantly if Hamlet had non feigned his insanity ) . Therefore, it was portion of Hamlet & # 8217 ; s computation that shaming insanity would non for good take intuition of his subterranean motivations, but merely purchase him clip to fix his slaying of Claudius and to vent his choler at those whom he resented. In add-on, Claudius & # 8217 ; eventual development of this intuition and his eventual blackwash effort at Hamlet are both dramatic devices meant to reason the drama in a mode that re-enforces the subjects associated with Hamlet & # 8217 ; s response to his compulsion. After all, they lead to the concluding blackwash scene that re-enforces these subjects.
4. An of import subject in the drama is the inability of many of Hamlet & # 8217 ; s people in the royal family to understand or psychologically accept the information that proves Claudius & # 8217 ; offense. This inability strengthens the hazard of psychological alienation that Hamlet might experience in trying to kill Claudius or wining in making so. There are assorted manifestations of this subject. Gertrude & # 8217 ; s deficiency of acknowledgment when Hamlet confronts her with the premises of Claudius & # 8217 ; offense is one. Polonius & # 8217 ; inability to understand why Hamlet seems insane is another, which reflects his general naivety in understanding things. The chief dramatic intent of the drama & # 8217 ; s opening scene is arguably to exemplify this subject. In it, Shakespeare portrays Hamlet & # 8217 ; s friends are naively friendly and loyal ( and therefore psychologically excessively na? ve to accept the information turn outing Claudius & # 8217 ; guilt, except for Horatio in peculiar ) . They are besides unable to catch the shade physically, and can non bring on the shade to state them of his message, as if lone Hamlet has the ability to cover responsibly and efficaciously with the shade & # 8217 ; s information.
Consequences of this subject include Hamlet faithlessly altering the names on the missive naming for his executing to really name for Rosencranz and Guildensterns & # 8217 ; executing. It is Hamlet & # 8217 ; s retaliation for the bitterness he feels against them for descrying on Hamlet and back uping Claudius. This morally dual standard behaviour consequences from his co-workers & # 8217 ; misconstruing Hamlet & # 8217 ; s motive and justification for his behaviour. Hamlet & # 8217 ; s killing of Polonius is besides a manifestation of this result.. If Polonius hadn & # 8217 ; t misjudged Hamlet, he would non hold been in his hazardous place behind the drape at that clip in the first topographic point. Therefore, the misinterpretation of information by his chaps in the royal family unwittingly do them to prosecute in estranging behavior vis- ? -vis Hamlet, bring oning Hamlet to react violently and resentfully towards them.
Cardinal Subjects of the Play
& gt ; From the above we derive the cardinal subjects of the drama. Among them are:
1 ) The intense psychological hurting that Hamlet & # 8217 ; s compulsion, per Se, causes him.
2 ) The ignorance and oblivion of his countrymen to Claudius & # 8217 ; guilt.
3 ) His inclination to sham insanity in order to hide his compulsion and to be able to show the intense feelings brought approximately within him by the compulsion and the deficiency of support he faces from his countrymen in transporting it out.
4 ) His compulsion with garnering information to turn out or confute Claudius & # 8217 ; guilt.
5 ) That the ignorance of his countrymen to Claudius & # 8217 ; guilt is an of import obstruction Hamlet faces in seeking to destruct Claudius.
6 ) The solitariness that Hamlet feels from holding an tremendous duty but being mostly entirely in cognizing about it and shouldering it.
7 ) That if Hamlet does detect cogent evidence of Claudius & # 8217 ; guilt, he must be careful to whom and under what circumstance he communicates it. Otherwise, he may be informed upon and later destroyed.
8 ) Sheer cunctation is one manner for Hamlet to cover with the emphasis of his catch-22 psychological state of affairs.
9 ) His inclination to violently corrupt Ophelia and Gertrude & # 8217 ; s love for him.
10 ) That Hamlet, despite his desire to pull out retaliation against Claudius, is besides actively looking for ways to alleviate himself of the psychological hurting that harbouring his compulsion causes him, even if seeking psychological safety in such ways might intend giving up on the enterprise wholly.
11 ) That Hamlet & # 8217 ; s consciousness, of the high hazard of personal alienation that he faces from his enterprise to pull out retaliation, is for him a beginning of great emphasis.
12 ) That the ignorance of his people of Claudius & # 8217 ; offense and their uncomfortableness at cognizing it may do them to perpetrate the morally double-standard act of rejecting Hamlet and back uping Claudius.
13 ) That despite his fright of rejection by his countrymen, Hamlet still has the capacity to take out on them the choler he feels against them for potentially or really perpetrating this double-standard act.
Virtually every scene or component in the drama relates to these subjects. In other words, the intent of Hamlet is merely to define and notice upon an single & # 8217 ; s psychological response to experiencing the rare type of compulsion that Hamlet feels in the play.. The above subjects are phenomena associated with that response, or with Shakespeare & # 8217 ; s theoretical account of that response.
