The Human Experience With Technology Essay, Research Paper

The Human Experience With Technology

Kelana Latimer

The universe is full engineering, about everything you see is the consequence of engineering. Our houses, autos, edifices, streets, visible radiations, even simple things like spoons, pencils, and nail limiters are all illustrations of engineering. We use it everyday without even think about how it affects us. We don? t think about how much a portion of our society it has become, or what life would be like without it. We don? t inquiry our engineering once we become accustomed to it but possibly we should. We should believe about what engineering has brought us, and what it enables us to make.

Is there anything unsafe about our dependance on engineering? Of class there is. Bing dependent on anything can be unsafe. The good and bad effects of our dependance have to be measured invariably. If the visible radiations go out, if the auto won? t start, if my computing machine clangs, these illustrate the failings in engineering that consequence in unsafe effects. Yet those possibilities and worlds do non discourage us from utilizing engineering, or from planing new engineerings.

A technological failure can be a menace but, the worse menace to us is ourselves. In a recent interview with Simonetta Rodriguez, ( an applied scientist and recent alumnus of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the field of civil and environmental technology ) I asked if she felt that there were any dangers about worlds dependence on engineering. She said, ? If the computing machines go down no work gets done. But before computing machines we got a batch less work done all the clip. The greater danger is how we use technology. ? We must utilize attention when doing determinations sing engineering. If we do non pay close attending to the ulterior effects of determinations, we could happen ourselves confronting much greater menaces that that of the visible radiations traveling out. See the possibility in the close hereafter of human cloning. What rights will a human ringer hold? Whose duty will they be? We face inquiries and frights such as this when we use engineering.

These frights will, no uncertainty, non halt our attempts to do our lives easier and more comfy because, engineering brings us added comfort. Whether it is comfort in our places or the comfort of cognizing that we will non decease if we get interrupt a bone, we design most things with comfort as our ultimate end. Sing this issue Ms. Rodriguez noted, ? Why would we develop something that make our lives harder? ? . She is right, why would we, were is the survival advantage? Human nature drives us to happen ways to do our lives easier, that is portion of what makes us human. However, some argue that the engineering we design has a serious down side: emphasis.

Has engineering truly added emphasis to our lives? I believe that it changed the nature of the emphasis. In

position of worrying about cave king of beastss and wolves, we worry about traffic on the bypass and, how much money we have. For the most portion, life endangering state of affairss do non do most of our emphasis. Alternatively we have lower degree emphasiss that last longer. Stress in both signifiers leads to serious wellness jobs.

Let? s say that you are walking in the forests. Suddenly you spot a really big bear. Your pulse quickens, students dilate, you start to sudate, your organic structure releases adrenaline, and your digestion Michigans: this is stress. Your organic structure prepares you to contend or to run. Then you see that the bear is walking off from you. You relax a small, but your organic structure remains active, your immune system is suppressed, fat is converted to fuel, and hydrocortisone is released. Cortisol regulates your metamorphosis and unsusceptibility but it is toxic over clip. All this is the normal bodily response to something nerve-racking. Now allow? s say that you are driving to work and you get stuck in a traffic jam. This is another nerve-racking state of affairs and your organic structure reacts much the same manner as if you had merely seen a bear. Today, traffic jams occur more frequently so bears in the forests, traffic consequences in on-going emphasis. But is this to state that we should halt utilizing engineering? Absolutely non. We must equilibrate the emphasis engineering causes, with the good things that it offers us.

I think that most people balance the emphasiss or they would non go on utilizing engineering. Peoples will non utilize something that adds excessively much emphasis to their lives. Everything that we build, everything that we invent is merely successful if the advantages are greater than the disadvantages. If we developed any engineering that put more emphasis on us than it was deserving, we would fling the engineering and develop something else.

Some people feel that engineering is commanding their lives and the universe. I say that engineering merely controls the lives of people who allow it to command their lives. Something can merely command your life if you let it. Technology itself can non command anything except what it was made to command. It is human existences who decide what the engineering should and will command.

We are the Masterss and shapers of engineering. If we did non contrive it at that place would non be any. Technology is and does what we want it to make. It has no head of its ain, it can non coerce anyone to utilize it, merely worlds can make that. If a individual feels he or she depends of their computing machine excessively much, he or she should cut down on its usage, or halt utilizing it wholly. Humans survived without computing machines and we could make it once more should we take to make so. Few would take to make this.

Technology does non hold a head of its ain. It can non make up one’s mind for itself to establish atomic missiles at the U.S. , worlds must make up one’s mind that. We built this destructive engineering, we must command it. Technology is non unsafe to worlds, worlds are unsafe to worlds.