Trial By Franz Kafka Essay, Research Paper

The Priest ( Kafka vs Camus ) The Outsider, written by Albert Camus, and The Trial, written by Franz Kafka, are two books that have been critically acclaimed since the clip that they were published. There are critics that claim that The Outsider is a dull book, and is non even a read-worthy book. Other people claim that it shows us how society really acts upon people who do non desire to be like the remainder of society. The Trial falls under the same sort of unfavorable judgment ; but both books, although written by different authors in a different? poque, autumn under the same sort of genre: Imprisoned Lifes. In both The Outsider and The Trial there are many people who influence the supporters in a positive and in a negative manner, but none of those characters are every bit of import as the priest. The priest, being of the same profession in both books and seeking to carry through the same sort of undertakings, have a wholly different consequence on the two supporters. In The Outsider the priest changes the whole attitude that Meursault has to life, whereas in The Trial the priest tells Joseph K. how his life really is. & # 8221 ; Why do you decline to see me? & # 8221 ; This inquiry was asked by the priest and was meant for Meursault. Normally, if a individual is convicted to decease, he will see a priest before the sentence is executed. Meursault did non make that. He abundantly refused to see the priest and why should he? He & # 8220 ; did non believe in god. & # 8221 ; Meursault did non care, as he did non care if his female parent died, or if person proposed matrimony to him. This of class went wholly against the regulations and moralss of society, which can non allow such sort of behavior. But why does Cam? s characterize Meursault like that? Why did he make such sort of an foreigner to society? Cam? s created such an foreigner because he wanted to demo people how life really is. Society does non accept people who do non flex the truth a small and prevarication. Society wants to do life as easy as can be, doing up prevarications so that everything can run swimmingly because truth can ache sometimes, and Cam? s knows that. Cam? s implements the priest non merely as another character in the novel, but as a individual who wants to state Meursault how society expects him to act. Meursault did non desire to cognize how he has to move to do the society happy, as a affair of fact, the priest was & # 8220 ; get downing to rag & # 8221 ; him. Meursault was non even following what the priest said but instead gazed out of the cell into the sky.Cam? s wants to demo us really how uninterested Meursault is in the priest. But all this is about to alter because Cam? s adds an unexpected turn. The priest references how even the hardest of felons stare at something at one point in their life and conceive of a godly face in it. Meursault did non see the face of Jesus Christ in it, but he saw the face of Marie, the miss who proposed the matrimony to him. But this was the turning life in Meursault? s life. All of a sudden he starts to care about things and take some involvement in things, and that explains the indignation he all of a sudden got against the priest. Meursault kn

ows that he his going to die, and he cannot accept that. His whole attitude all of a sudden changed. Cam?s shows us that a person cannot go against society and that society and the majority, be it good or bad, will always win.Kafka?s priest however was different. He did not tell to change Joseph K.?s life but rather told Joseph K. how his life is and how unjust society actually is. The setting that Kafka creates is pretty phenomenal. The cathedral is dark and gloomy, only lighted by some oil lamps which have a small illumination radius. “It is a rainy day”, which gives it an even more sad and depressing feeling. As time passes by, the inside of the cathedral gets darker and darker, which creates a sort of evil foreshadowing of what will happen at the end of the book. Then the priest comes to the altar, which is humorous because there will be no sermon right now. It is rainy, a weekday and nobody showed up at the church. But that is the illusion Kafka wants to create. The priest is not there to preach, he is there to talk to Joseph K. During the talk the priest has with Joseph K., Kafka uses the analogy with the doorman.But why did Kafka use this? Kafka used this analogy because he wanted to show us how unjust and corrupt the court and justice system actually is. Yes, the government states that the law is there so everybody can benefit from it; “justice is there for everybody” and that anybody can access it with no difficulty. But later Kafka writes that everything is accessible to man, except the law. “The law is closed to him”, which means there will be no justice because the law cannot be accessed, and without the law there cannot be any justice. Through this scene Kafka also foreshadows that Joseph K. has been played the fool, and that the court is actually unjust and that he was convicted unjustly. Now, Joseph K. did not know this. He thought that everything was well, and that his appeal has already been processed and that he would be free in a few days. But that is why Kafka put in the priest, so that he can clarify to Joseph K. how and in what situation the life of Joseph K. actually stands.Both books make profound impact on the readers; some reject the novels and regard them as absolute trash because they do not want to accept that society actually is how the two authors, Albert Camus and Franz Kafka, portray them to be. They both carry a lot of hidden messages and meanings and how the authors actually feel about the society they live in. They criticize society because the society is corrupt and unjust, and that is what the authors wanted us readers to find out ourselves because one person alone cannot make any changes. It has to be many persons, perhaps even a whole society. Many critics have criticized these books, trying to bring down their popularity because they themselves have been a part of the corrupt and unjust society and they do not want to admit that they belong to one of these societies. These books portray the truth of what kind of world we live in today and that we should think about ourselves and what our ethics in life actually are.