Both the Peloponnesian War and the American Civil War have been dubbed “modern conflicts” due to their important going from the traditional methods of warfare that had antecedently existed. To understand these differences. one must look at the differences closely. The modern nature of the Peloponnesian War was based on scheme and tactics. Namely. the Spartans employed guerrilla warfare schemes that did non be antecedently. This caught the Athenians wholly napping. Additionally. Sparta to a great extent employed naval warfare in combination with foot military personnels.
This multifaceted attack laid the foundation for the schemes of warfare in WWI. The Civil War ushered in modern struggles through its development of new combat systems. The Gatling Gun. The Ironclads. and crude pigboats were all portion of Civil War combat. Even the traditional arms of the foot changed things significantly. A bizarre as it may be. anterior to the Civil War. conflicts would pull witnesss to see the attendant slaughter of the war. With the Civil War. there were efforts by “audiences” to watch the slaughter.
However. they shortly discovered that the conflict of the Civil War did non handle witnesss kindly. Namely. cannon fire and advices breach lading rifles led to witnesss being injured or killed in the crossfire. This would change the perceptual experience of war since the employment of more efficient arms would travel the Civil War into a kingdom of warfare that is much closer to modern struggles. While both of these wars did take topographic point many old ages ago. they still influence the tactics and schemes of warfare today. As such. it might non be accurate to mention to them as modern wars every bit much as timeless wars.
