Untitled Essay, Research Paper

FrankensteinFrankenstein Morality. It has been questioned by people, honored by people and revered since the beginning of clip. Yet even today non one individual can state what is morally right. It is a affair of sentiment. It was Dr.Victor Frankenstein & # 8217 ; s sentiment that it was alright to make a & # 8220 ; monster & # 8221 ; . Frankenstein & # 8217 ; s creative activity needed a comrade. Knowing that his first creative activity was evil should the physician make a 2nd? With the cognition at manus, to Dr.Frankenstein, it is non at all morally correct to convey another monster into the universe. Looking at this probelm with his household in head, the physician begins his work on the 2nd monster. The first monster threatened Frankenstein and even his household. The monster angrily said to Frankenstein, & # 8220 ; I can do you so wretched. & # 8221 ; ( pg. 162 ) Trying to frighten Frankenstein for non making his mate the monster resorted to menaces. If the good physician does make a comrade for his first creative activity he may be jeopardizing others. & # 8220 ; The suffering monster whom I had created, & # 8221 ; ( pg.152 ) says Victor upon looking back at his work. If there is another monster there will be twice the power and perchance twice the immorality, which could ache or kill his household. When and if Frankenstein commits the moral wickedness of making another monster he may be rid of both monsters everlastingly. & # 8220 ; With the comrade you bestow I will discontinue the vicinity of adult male, & # 8221 ; ( pg 142 ) promises the morally corrupt monster to the physician upon the completion of his spouse. When the physician, if and when he, finished his first creative activity & # 8217 ; s mate there is a opportunity that the monsters will non maintain their promise and remain in Europe envoking fright into townfolk. The good physician, seeking to move morally, destroys the monster for the good of the universe. The monsters can potentially take over whatever they please. & # 8220 ; A race of Satans would be propegated, & # 8221 ; ( pg. 163 ) thinks Frankenstein to himself in his survey. The monsters, if powerful plenty, could perchance take over Europe. Frankenstein realizes that he can non perchance destine the universe to profit himself. & # 8220 ; Shall I, in coold blood, set loose upon the Earth a daemon.. & # 8221 ; ( pg. 162 ) argues Frankenstein with his creative activity. It is non morally right for one individual to unleash such a panic on the worl

d to benefit only himself and his family. Frankenstein will not let any example change his mind on the point that the monster is and will always be morally corupt. Continuing on his point that the monster was too evil to duplicate, Frankenstein says, “Your threats cannot move me to do an act of wickedness; but they confirm me in determination of not creating you a companion in vice.”( pg. 163) Frankenstein will not sacrifice his morallity because of persuation from a monster. Although beholding the threat of death and misery Frankenstein held his ground and did not sacrifice his moral. When and if Frankenstein creates another monster he can not feel as if he has done the morally right thing. From creating the monster Frankenstein will some how be making people other than himself unhappy. ” I consent to your demand, on your solem oath to quite Europe forever, and every other place in the neighbourhood of man,”(pg. 143) says Frankenstein as he sees the power that the two could possibly possess. The good doctor sees that with his own hands he could possibly scar the world forever. The doctor wants, if anyone, himself to be unhappy instead of all of man kind. “Begone! I do break my promise,” (pg. 162) states the doctor angrily. Not thinking about himself but the world unselfishly breaks his promise to the monster. Possessing such a great mind the doctor is able to realize that a greater evil will be realesed upon the earth then upon himself. “Your threats cannot move me to do an act of wickedness,”(pg. 162) says the doctor as he argues his point with his creation. The doctor sees that a greater and more horrible result can come from him making the second monster than not. With the knowledge at hand, to Dr.Frankenstein, it is not at all morally correct to bring another monster into the world. On the one hand if the second monster was created Frankenstein’s family would be saved. By the same token the rest of the world could be forced to bow before two hideous monsters. The problem, making or not making the second monster, played heavily on Frankenstein’s mind, possibly caused his brief lapse into the realm of the insane. Even though Frankenstein began his work for the good of man his experiment ended up hurting himself and his family.