Untitled Essay, Research Paper

Mustard Gas is a group of chemical compounds used in chemical warfare, so called because of its mustard-like odor. Mustard gas contains C, H, and Cl, with either S or N. When it comes in contact with tegument, mustard gas causes terrible blisters. Clothing can be worn to protect the tegument, but take a breathing it produces utmost harm to the lungs and other internal tissues. These compounds are peculiarly harmful to moist countries of the human organic structure, such as the eyes, axillas, and inguen, and concentrated exposure may be fatal. Mustard gas is by and large a solid or liquid, but can besides be sprayed as an aerosol. Modern gas warfare began during World War I ( 1914-1918 ) . In April 1915, after several experiments utilizing tear gas, German forces used Cl gas against British and Gallic military personnels in Ieper, Belgium. The Germans set up a series of cylinders filled with Cl gas along their front line. Opening the cylinders, they released a cloud of Cl gas that the air current carried to their enemy? s front line. Thousands of Allied military personnels succumbed to the effects of the gas, and because of this desolation, the gas became an instrument of psychological every bit good as physical warfare. Protective equipment such as gas masks was shortly issued to parade. This solved the job chiefly, but still did non give complete protection.In September 1915 the British initiated a gas onslaught

against the Germans. Some of the British troops were inadvertently exposed, and this led to the rapid development of projectiles filled with gas that could be fired into the enemy?s trenches from a safer distance. German chemist Fritz Haber supervised the first use of chlorine gas by the German military in 1915. Later, he directed the production of a deadlier form of gas, phosgene, as well as mustard gas. Mustard gas, first used in 1917, proved more stable than chlorine gas and phosgene, and could contaminate an area for days after its release. (Apparently those military scientists and leaders think more destruction is better. This just shows how sick the world is.) LI am really against mostly all forms of violance, so spraying mustard gas on fighting soldiers would not get my support. I think it is ridiculous that military scientists and military leaders think that more harm is better. For all those sick, violant military people, I suppose mustard gas could be a useful tool of destruction. After all, it hurts and kills, and that?s what the military is all about. In closing, I just want to say that instead of bombing countries and using chemical warefare, we should be spend more time trying to unite countries, work out disagreements and avoid war. I know I was supposed to mainly talk about my opinion on mustard gas, but mustard gas has to do with violance and war, and violance and war have to do with my opinion above. J