Untitled Essay, Research Paper

She takes one last glimpse at her contemplation in the glass door. She pulls it unfastened and slowly enters the office edifice. As she walks across the floor, her heels snaping on the wood panels, she tucks a isolated lock of hair behind her ear. She stands, pess shoulder-width apart, the hem of her navy bluish skirt brushing her articulatio genuss. & # 8220 ; Excuse me, & # 8221 ; she says to the receptionist behind the desk, & # 8220 ; I & # 8217 ; m here about the position. & # 8221 ; As she says this, she hastily makes certain that the clasp of her necklace is in the right topographic point, and that her fiting navy bluish sport jacket is buttoned suitably. & # 8220 ; Please wait right over at that place, & # 8221 ; he says, eyeing her garb. She turns about to sit down, and her curly brown hair bouncinesss with each measure she takes towards the other waiting appliers. Now? conceive of she were a he. Imagine that he was the 1 who pulled the glass door unfastened and told the receptionist he was at that place for the place. What would be different? Would the altered perceptual experience be due to the simple fact that he is a adult male? Or is it more than that? In Deborah Tannen & # 8217 ; s article & # 8220 ; Wears Jump Suit. Sensible Shoes. Uses Husbands Last Name, & # 8221 ; she suggests that adult females are the & # 8220 ; marked & # 8221 ; gender, and that this has a profound consequence on the manner that adult females are viewed. By & # 8220 ; marked & # 8221 ; Tannen is means that the myriad of options a adult female has when it comes to her personal presentation signify to other people the sort of adult female she is. A adult male does non hold such a assortment of options, so he is able to stay & # 8220 ; unmarked. & # 8221 ; Although I believe that these options can be positive since they give a adult female the opportunity to show her individualism, they can go a nuisance in the concern kingdom. The premises that are made about a adult female based upon her visual aspect can be annoying, peculiarly when using for a concern place. My personal cognition of the concern universe is reasonably limited due to my immature age, but I have had the painful experience of an interview. Last summer I was interviewed to be an office adjutant for an insurance bureau. I opted for a conservative ecru frock with a fiting jacket, alternatively of my usual ripped denims and a T-shirt. And alternatively of have oning my hair in a ponytail, I curled my hair

under and put a clip on either side of my head. “Impressions are everything,” I remembered being told. (I doubt my brother ever had that drilled into him.) Sure, a man would be terribly looked down upon as well if he showed up to an interview wearing ripped jeans and a T-shirt; there are certain standards that everyone, both men and women, must uphold when applying for a job. The difference, though, is that women have a much wider range of selection when it comes to their appearances. Most men would show up to a formal interview in a pair of ironed slacks, a button-up shirt, and possibly a tie. This does not leave much room for interpretation. When a man looks in the mirror before running out the door for an interview, I imagine he does not scrutinize every last detail of his attire. He simply makes sure that he is presentable. A woman, on the other hand, inspects every article of clothing, from her shoes, to her blouse, to her earrings, to confirm that her appearance “says the right thing.” The application process can be nerve-racking for anyone. But having the knowledge that an arbitrary item—such as shoes or jewelry—can be a character marker is an unneeded added pressure. A major part of the problem of being marked is that it is not supposed to be discussed. If a woman complains about her business position, and cites her femininity as one of the causes, she runs the risk of being labeled a feminist. Tannen points out that being classified a feminist has strong implications, which can be either negative or positive (Tannen, paragraph 29).I would say that labels are unfair, but that might sound like a comparative statement against men. Some may argue that men experience unfair pressures in the business world as well. If a man were to cite his maleness as the root of his pressures, he may be dubbed “chauvinistic.” This is just as unfair as labeling a woman, if he can adequately support his claims. People should be free to express their opinions on this without being labeled. The world is not perfect, at least not in a conventional sense, but this should not stop a person from attaining his or her pursuits or from expressing his or her opinions. Applying for a job is no exception to this.