William Carlos Williams Essay Research Paper William

Free Articles

William Carlos Williams Essay, Research Paper

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

William Carlos Williams

1883-1963

Nationality: American New Entry: 03/01/1999

Topographic point of Birth: Rutherford, New Jersey, United States

Genre ( s ) : Poetry ; Novels ; Short Stories ; Plays ; Autobiography/Memoir ; Philosophy ; Letters ; Essays ; Songs/Lyrics and libretti

Award ( s ) :

Dial Award, 1926, for distinguished service to American literature ; Guarantors Prize from Poetry, 1931 ; LL.D. from University of Buffalo, 1946, and Fairleigh Dickinson University, 1959 ; Russell Loines Memorial Award for poesy from National Institute of Arts and Letters, 1948 ; Litt.D. from Rutgers University, 1948, Bard College, 1948, and University of Pennsylvania, 1952 ; appointed to chair of poesy at Library of Congress, 1949 ( appointment withdrawn, but later renewed ) ; National Book Award for poesy, 1950, for Selected Poems and Paterson, Book III ; Bollingen Prize in poesy from Yale University Library, 1952 ; Levinson Prize, 1954, and Oscar Blumenthal Prize, 1955, both for verse forms published in Poetry ; Academy of American Poets family, 1956 ; Brandeis University originative humanistic disciplines decoration in poetry-fiction-nonfiction, 1957-58, in acknowledgment of a life-time of distinguished accomplishment ; Pulitzer Prize in poesy for Pictures From Brueghel and American Academy of Arts and Letters gold decoration for poesy from National Institute of Arts and Letters, both 1963.

Table of Contentss:

Personal Information

Career

Hagiographas

Sidelights

Further Readings About the Writer

Personal Information: Family: Born September 17, 1883, in Rutherford, New Jersey, United States ; died March 4, 1963, in Rutherford, New Jersey, United States ; boy of William George ( in concern ) and Raquel Helene ( Hoheb ) Williams ; married Florence Herman, December 12, 1912 ; kids: William, Eric, Paul Herman. Education: University of Pennsylvania, M.D. , 1906 ; graduate student survey at University of Leipzig, 1909- 10. Memberships: American Academy of Arts and Letters, National Institute of Arts and Letters, Academy of American Poets, Bergen County ( New Jersey ) Medical Association.

Career: Poet, dramatist, novelist, litterateur, and doctor. Gallic Hospital and Nursery and Child & # 8217 ; s Hospital, New York, New York, intern, 1906- 09 ; private medical pattern in Rutherford, New Jersey, 1910-51. University of Washington, Seattle, sing professor of English, 1948.

WRITINGS BY THE AUTHOR:

Poem

& # 183 ; ( Under name William C. Williams ) Poems, in private printed, 1909.

& # 183 ; The Tempers, Elkin Matthews, 1913.

& # 183 ; Al Que Quiere! , Four Seas, 1917.

& # 183 ; Kora in Hell: Improvisations, Four Seas, 1920, reprinted, Kraus Reprint, 1973 ( besides see below ) .

& # 183 ; Sour Grapes, Four Seas, 1921.

& # 183 ; Go Go, Monroe Wheeler, 1923.

& # 183 ; Spring and All, Contact Publishing, 1923, reprinted, Frontier Press, 1970 ( besides see below ) .

& # 183 ; The Cod Head, Harvest Press, 1932.

& # 183 ; Collected Poems, 1921-1931, foreword by Wallace Stevens, Objectivist Press, 1934.

& # 183 ; An Early Martyr and Other Poems, Alcestis Press, 1935.

& # 183 ; Adam & A ; Eve & A ; The City, Alcestis Press, 1936.

& # 183 ; The Complete Collected Poems of William Carlos Williams, 1906- 1938, New Directions, 1938.

& # 183 ; The Broken Span, New Directions, 1941.

& # 183 ; The Wedge, Cummington Press ( Cummington, Massachusetts ) , 1944.

& # 183 ; Paterson, New Directions, Book I, 1946, Book II, 1948, Book III, 1949, Book IV, 1951, Book V, 1958, Books I-V published in one volume, 1963.

& # 183 ; The Clouds, Wells College Press and Cummington Press, 1948.

& # 183 ; Selected Poems, debut by Randall Jarrell, New Directions, 1949, revised edition, 1968.

& # 183 ; The Pink Church, Golden Goose Press, 1949.

& # 183 ; The Collected Later Poems, New Directions, 1950, revised edition, 1963.

& # 183 ; Collected Earlier Poems, New Directions, 1951, revised edition, 1966.

& # 183 ; The Desert Music and Other Poems, Random House, 1954 ( besides see below ) .

& # 183 ; Journey to Love ( includes Asphodel, That Greeny Flower ) , Random House, 1955 ( besides see below ) .

& # 183 ; The Lost Poems of William Carlos Williams ; or, The Past Recaptured, collected by John C. Thirlwall, published in New Directions 16, New Directions, 1957.

& # 183 ; Pictures From Brueghel and Other Poems ( includes The Desert Music and Journey to Love ) , New Directions, 1962.

& # 183 ; Selected Poems, debut by Charles Tomlinson, Penguin, 1976.

& # 183 ; Collected Poems: Volume 1, 1909-1939, edited by A. Walton Litz and Christopher MacGowan, Carcanet, 1988, Volume 2, 1939-1962, edited by MacGowan, 1989.

& # 183 ; Asphodel, That Greeny Flower & A ; Other Love Poems, new Directions, 1994.

& # 183 ; Early Poems, Dover Publications, 1997.

OTHER

& # 183 ; The Great American Novel, Three Mountains Press, 1923, reprinted, Folcroft, 1973 ( besides see below ) .

& # 183 ; In the American Grain ( essays ) , A. & A ; C. Boni, 1925, reprinted with debut by Horace Gregory, New Directions, 1967.

& # 183 ; A Ocean trip to Pagany ( novel ) , Macaulay, 1928, reprinted, New Directions, 1970.

& # 183 ; ( Translator ) Philippe Soupault, Last Nights of Paris, Macaulay, 1929, reprinted, Full Court Press, 1982.

& # 183 ; The Knife of the Times, and Other Stories ( short narratives ) , Dragon Press, 1932, reprinted, Folcroft, 1974.

& # 183 ; A Novelette and Other Prose, TO Publishers, 1932 ( besides see below ) .

& # 183 ; The First President ( three-act libretto for an opera ) , published in American Caravan, 1936.

& # 183 ; White Mule ( novel ; portion I of trilogy ) , New Directions, 1937, reprinted, 1967.

& # 183 ; Life along the Passaic River ( short narratives ) , New Directions, 1938.

& # 183 ; In the Money ( novel ; portion II of White Mule trilogy ) , New Directions, 1940, reprinted, 1967.

& # 183 ; A Dream of Love ( three-act drama ) , New Directions, 1948.

& # 183 ; A Beginning on the Short Narrative: Notes, Alicat Bookshop Press, 1950, reprinted, Norwood, 1978.

& # 183 ; Make Light of It: Collected Narratives, Random House, 1950.

& # 183 ; Autobiography, Random House, 1951, published as The Autobiography of William Carlos Williams, New Directions, 1967.

& # 183 ; The Build-Up ( novel ; portion III of White Mule trilogy ) , Random House, 1952.

& # 183 ; ( Translator with female parent, Raquel Helene Williams ) Pedro Espinosa, A Dog and the Fever ( novelette ) , Shoe String Press, 1954.

& # 183 ; Selected Essays, Random House, 1954.

& # 183 ; The Selected Letters of William Carlos Williams, edited by John C. Thirlwall, McDowell, Obolensky, 1957.

& # 183 ; I Wanted to Write a Poem: The Autobiography of the Works of a Poet, edited by Edith Heal, Beacon Press, 1958.

& # 183 ; Yes, Mrs. Williams: A Personal Record of My Mother, McDowell, Obolensky, 1959.

& # 183 ; Many Loves and Other Plaies: The Collected Plays of William Carlos Williams, New Directions, 1961.

& # 183 ; The Farmers & # 8217 ; Daughters: Collected Narratives, debut by Van Wyck Brooks, New Directions, 1961.

& # 183 ; The William Carlos Williams Reader, edited and introduced by M. L. Rosenthal, New Directions, 1966.

& # 183 ; Imaginations ( contains Kora in Hell, Spring and All, The Great American Novel, The Descent of Winter, and A Novelette and Other Prose ) , edited by Webster Schott, New Directions, 1970.

& # 183 ; The Embodiment of Knowledge ( doctrine ) , edited by Ron Loewinsohn, New Directions, 1974.

& # 183 ; Interviews With William Carlos Williams: & # 8220 ; Talking Straight Ahead, & # 8221 ; edited and introduced by Linda Welshimer Wagner, New Directions, 1976.

& # 183 ; A Recognizable Image: William Carlos Williams on Art and Artists, edited by Bram Dijkstra, New Directions, 1978.

& # 183 ; William Carlos Williams: The Doctor Stories, compiled with an debut by Robert Coles, New Directions, 1984.

& # 183 ; The Collected Stories of William Carlos Williams, New Directions, 1996.

& # 183 ; Pound/Williams: Selected Letterss of Ezra Pound and William Carlos Williams, edited by Hugh Witemeyer, New Directions, 1996.

& # 183 ; The Letters of Denise Levertov and William Carlos Williams, edited by Christopher MacGowan, New Directions, 1998.

& # 183 ; William Carlos Williams and Charles Tomlinson: A Transatlantic Connection, edited by Barry Magid and Hugh Witemeyer, P. Lang ( New York City ) , 1998.

Subscriber to legion literary magazines and diaries, including Poetry, The Dial, Origin, Blast, Pagany, Little Review, New Masses, Partisan Review, and Glebe. Contributing editor of literary magazines and diaries, including Contact I, 1920-23, and Contact II, 1932.

& # 8220 ; Sidelights & # 8221 ;

William Carlos Williams has ever been known as an experimenter, an pioneer, a radical figure in American poesy. Yet in comparing to creative persons of his ain clip who sought a new environment for creativeness as exiles in Europe, Williams lived a remarkably conventional life. A physician for more than forty old ages functioning the New Jersey town of Rutherford, he relied on his patients, the America around him, and his ain exuberant imaginativeness to make a distinctively American poetry. Often domestic in focal point and & # 8220 ; singular for its empathy, understanding, its muscular and emotional designation with its topics, & # 8221 ; Williams & # 8217 ; s poesy is besides characteristically honest: & # 8220 ; There is no optimistic sightlessness in Williams, & # 8221 ; wrote Randall Jarrell, & # 8220 ; though there is a fresh merriment, a stubborn or unbeatable joyousness. & # 8221 ;

Born the first of two boies of an English male parent and a Puerto Rican female parent of French, Dutch, Spanish, and Judaic lineage, Williams grew up in Rutherford, where his household provided him with a fertile background in art and literature. His male parent & # 8217 ; s female parent, coincidently named Emily Dickinson, was a lover of theater, and his ain female parent painted. Williams & # 8217 ; s male parent introduced his favourite writer, Shakespeare, to his boies and read Dante and the Bible to them every bit good ; but Williams had other involvements in survey. His enthusiastic chase of math and scientific discipline at New York City & # 8217 ; s Horace Mann High School & # 8220 ; showed how small authorship entered into any of my calculations. & # 8221 ; Later in high school, though, Williams took an involvement in linguistic communications and felt for the first clip the exhilaration of great books. He recalled his first verse form, besides written during that clip, giving him a feeling of joy.

Aside from an emerging authorship consciousness, Williams & # 8217 ; s early life was & # 8220 ; Sweet and sour, & # 8221 ; reported Reed Whittemore ; Williams himself wrote that & # 8220 ; panic dominated my young person, non fear. & # 8221 ; Part of this panic, speculated James Breslin, came & # 8220 ; from the stiff idealism and moral perfectionism his parents tried to transfuse in him. & # 8221 ; Williams & # 8217 ; s letters written while a pupil at the University of Pennsylvania to his female parent represent some of the outlooks he carried: & # 8220 ; I ne’er did and ne’er will make a premeditated bad title in my life, & # 8221 ; he wrote in 1904. & # 8220 ; Besides & # 8230 ; I have ne’er had and ne’er will hold anything but the purest and highest and best ideas about you and papa. & # 8221 ; It was mostly parental influence that sent him straight from high school to Pennsylvania in the first topographic point & # 8211 ; to analyze medical specialty. But as Breslin noted, Williams used his college experiences as a agency to creativeness, alternatively of, as his parents might hold wished, as a agency to success.

The struggle Williams felt between his parents & # 8217 ; hopes for their boy & # 8217 ; s success in medical specialty and his ain less conventional urges is mirrored in his poetic heroes of the clip & # 8211 ; John Keats and Walt Whitman. Keats & # 8217 ; s traditionally rhymed and metered poetry impressed the immature poet enormously. & # 8220 ; Keats was my God, & # 8221 ; Williams subsequently revealed ; and his first major poetic work was a theoretical account of Keats & # 8217 ; s & # 8220 ; Endymion. & # 8221 ; In contrast, Whitman & # 8217 ; s free poetry offered & # 8220 ; an impulse toward freedom and release of the ego, & # 8221 ; said Donald Barlow Stauffer. Williams explained how he came to tie in Whitman with this impulse toward freedom when he said, & # 8220 ; I reserved my `Whitmanesque & # 8217 ; ideas, a kind of catharsis and confessional, to unclutter my caput and bosom from bombastic obsessions. & # 8221 ; Yet, by his first twelvemonth at Pennsylvania Williams had found a well more graphic wise man than Whitman in a friend, Ezra Pound.

Williams & # 8217 ; s friendly relationship with Pound marked a watershed in the immature poet & # 8217 ; s life: he subsequently insisted, & # 8220 ; before run intoing Pound is like B.C. and A.D. & # 8221 ; & # 8220 ; Under Pound & # 8217 ; s influence and other stimulations, & # 8221 ; reported John Malcolm Brinnin, & # 8220 ; Williams was shortly ready to shut the door on the `studied elegance of Keats on one manus and the natural energy of Whitman on the other. & # 8217 ; & # 8221 ; Aside from the poetic influences, Pound introduced Williams to a group of friends, including poet Hilda Doolittle ( H.D. ) and painter Charles Demuth, & # 8220 ; who shared the sorts of feelings that in Rutherford had made him scared and stray, & # 8221 ; Breslin declared. H.D. , for illustration, with her arty frock and her distinctive features & # 8211 ; sometimes she & # 8217 ; d splash ink onto her apparels & # 8220 ; to give her a feeling of freedom and indifference towards the mere agencies of composing & # 8221 ; & # 8211 ; fascinated Williams with a & # 8220 ; provocative indifference to govern and order which I liked. & # 8221 ;

In a similar manner, it was a reaction against the stiff and ordered poesy of the clip that led Williams to fall in Pound, H.D. , and others as the nucleus of what became known as the Imagist motion. While correlate radical motions had begun in picture ( Cezanne ) , music ( Stravinsky ) , and fiction ( Stein ) , poesy was still bogged down by & # 8220 ; the inversions and redundancies imposed by the attempt `to fill out a standard signifier, & # 8217 ; & # 8221 ; explained David Perkins. The Imagists broke from this formulaic poesy by emphasizing a poetry of & # 8220 ; Swift, unlittered, functional phrasing. & # 8221 ; Williams & # 8217 ; s first book, Poems ( 1909 ) , a & # 8220 ; conventional & # 8221 ; work, & # 8220 ; correct in sentiment and enunciation, & # 8221 ; preceded the Imagist influence. But in The Tempers ( 1913 ) , as Bernard Duffey realized, Williams & # 8217 ; s & # 8220 ; manner was directed by an Imagist feeling, though it still depended on romantic and poeticized allusiveness. & # 8221 ; And while Pound drifted towards increased allusiveness in his work, Williams stuck with Pound & # 8217 ; s dogma to & # 8220 ; do it new. & # 8221 ; By 1917 and the publication of his 3rd book, Al Que Quiere! , & # 8220 ; Williams began to use the Imagist rule of `direct intervention of the thing & # 8217 ; reasonably strictly, & # 8221 ; declared James Guimond. Besides at this clip, as Perkins demonstrated, Williams was & # 8220 ; get downing to emphasize that poesy must happen its `primary drift & # 8217 ; & # 8230 ; in `local conditions. & # 8217 ; & # 8221 ; & # 8220 ; I was determined to utilize the stuff I knew, & # 8221 ; Williams subsequently reflected ; and as a physician, Williams knew closely the people of Rutherford.

Get downing with his internship in the decrepit & # 8220 ; Hell & # 8217 ; s Kitchen & # 8221 ; country of New York City and throughout his 40 old ages of private pattern in Rutherford, Williams heard the & # 8220 ; inarticulate verse forms & # 8221 ; of his patients. As a physician, his & # 8220 ; medical badge, & # 8221 ; as he called it, permitted him & # 8220 ; to follow the hapless defeated organic structure into those gulfs and grottos & # 8230 ; , to be present at deceases and births, at the anguished conflicts between girl and devilish mother. & # 8221 ; From these minutes, poesy developed: & # 8220 ; it has fluttered before me for a minute, a phrase which I rapidly write down on anything at manus, any piece of paper I can grab. & # 8221 ; Some of his verse forms were born on prescription spaces, others typed in a few trim proceedingss between patient visits. Williams & # 8217 ; s work, nevertheless, did more than fuel his poesy: it allowed him & # 8220 ; to compose what he chose, free from any sort of fiscal or political force per unit area. From the beginning, & # 8221 ; disclosed Linda Wagner, & # 8220 ; he understood the trade-offs: he would hold less clip to compose ; he would necessitate more physical staying power than people with merely one business & # 8230 ; . [ He ] was willing to populate the sort of rushed being that would be necessary, herding two full life-times into one, & # 8230 ; larning from the first and so understanding through the second. & # 8221 ; There is small uncertainty that he succeeded in both: Richard Ellman and Robert O & # 8217 ; Clair called him & # 8220 ; the most of import literary physician since Chekov. & # 8221 ;

Williams & # 8217 ; s deep sense of humanity pervaded both his work in medical specialty and his Hagiographas. & # 8220 ; He loved being a physician, doing house calls, and speaking to people, & # 8221 ; his married woman, Flossie, lovingly recollected. Possibly a less subjective assessment came from Webster Schott, who defined Williams as & # 8220 ; an vastly complicated adult male: energetic, compassionate, socially witting, depressive, polished, provincial, tough, fastidious, freakish, independent, dedicated, wholly antiphonal & # 8230 ; . He was the complete homo being, and all of the qualities of his personality were fused in his writings. & # 8221 ; And, as Randall Jarrell pointed out, it is exactly in his written work where Williams demonstrates that & # 8220 ; he feels, non merely says, that the differences between work forces are less of import than their similarities & # 8211 ; that he and you and I, together, are the Little Men. & # 8221 ;

Matching with Williams & # 8217 ; s attractive force to the venue was his womb-to-tomb pursuit to hold poesy mirror the address of the American people. Williams had no involvement, he said, in the & # 8220 ; address of the English state people, which would hold something unreal about it & # 8221 ; ; alternatively he sought a & # 8220 ; linguistic communication modified by our environment, the American environment. & # 8221 ; Marc Hofstadter explained: & # 8220 ; Thinking of himself as a local poet who possessed neither the high civilization nor the old-world manners of an Eliot or Pound, he sought to show his democracy through his manner of talking & # 8230 ; . His point was to talk on an equal degree with the reader, and to utilize the linguistic communication and thought stuffs of America in showing his point of view. & # 8221 ;

While Williams continued with his inventions in the American parlance and his experiments in signifier, he fell out of favour with some of his ain coevalss. Kora in Hell: Improvisations, for illustration, suffered some cutting onslaughts. For a twelvemonth Williams had made a wont of entering something & # 8211 ; anything & # 8211 ; in his notebooks every dark, and followed these jottings with a remark. One of & # 8220 ; Williams & # 8217 ; s ain favourite books & # 8230 ; , the prose poesy of Kora is an extraordinary combination of apothegm, romanticism, philosophizing, obscureness, compulsion, exhortation, revery, beautiful lines and chilling paragraphs, & # 8221 ; wrote Webster Schott. Yet, as Hugh Fox reported, few equals shared Williams & # 8217 ; s enthusiasm for the book. Pound called it & # 8220 ; incoherent & # 8221 ; and & # 8220 ; un-American & # 8221 ; ; H.D. objected to its & # 8220 ; light-mindednesss, & # 8221 ; its & # 8220 ; self-mockery, & # 8221 ; its & # 8220 ; un-seriousness & # 8221 ; ; and Wallace Stevens complained about Williams & # 8217 ; s & # 8220 ; tantrums. & # 8221 ; Fox defended the daring Williams against his critics by stating, & # 8220 ; Anything hitherto undone is fits, light-mindedness, opacity & # 8230 ; they don & # 8217 ; t see ( as Williams does ) that they are facing a new linguistic communication and they have to larn how to decode it before they can enjoy it. & # 8221 ;

Surrounded by unfavorable judgment, Williams became progressively defensive during this clip. His prologue to Kora came from his demand & # 8220 ; to give some indicant of myself to the people I knew ; sound off, state the universe & # 8211 ; particularly my intimate friends & # 8211 ; how I felt about them. & # 8221 ; With or without Alliess, Williams was determined to go on the progresss he felt he had made in American poesy.

What Williams did non anticipate, nevertheless, was the & # 8220 ; atom bomb & # 8221 ; on modern poesy & # 8211 ; T. S. Eliot & # 8217 ; s The Waste Land. Williams had no wrangle with Eliot & # 8217 ; s genius & # 8211 ; he said Eliot was composing poems every bit good as Keats & # 8217 ; s & # 8220 ; Ode to a Nightingale & # 8221 ; & # 8211 ; but, merely, & # 8220 ; we were interrupting the regulations, whereas he was conforming to the Excellencies of schoolroom English. & # 8221 ; As he explained in his Autobiography, & # 8220 ; I felt at one time that it had set me back twenty old ages and I & # 8217 ; m certain it did. Critically, Eliot returned us to the schoolroom merely at the minute when I felt we were on a point to get away to affairs much closer to the kernel of a new art signifier itself & # 8211 ; rooted in the vicinity which should give it fruit. & # 8221 ; Not merely did Williams feel threatened by Eliot & # 8217 ; s success, but besides by the attending The Waste Land received. As Karl Shapiro pointed out, & # 8220 ; he was left high and dry: Pound, who was virtually the co- writer of Eliot & # 8217 ; s verse forms, and Marianne Moore were now polarized to Eliot. Williams felt this and would experience it for another twenty old ages. His ain poesy would hold to come on against the turning orthodoxy of Eliot criticism. & # 8221 ; But while the Eliot wave doubtless sank his liquors, at the same clip it buoyed his finding: & # 8220 ; It was a daze to me that he was so enormously successful, & # 8221 ; Williams admitted. & # 8220 ; My coevalss flocked to him & # 8211 ; off from what I wanted. It forced me to be successful. & # 8221 ;

Harmonizing to Breslin, The Waste Land was one of the & # 8220 ; major influence [ s ] on that singular volume, & # 8221 ; Williams & # 8217 ; s following book, Spring and All. The last in a decennary of experimental poesy, Spring and All viewed the same American landscape as did Eliot but interpreted it otherwise. Williams & # 8220 ; saw his poetic undertaking was to confirm the self- reliant, sympathetic consciousness of Whitman in a broken industrialised universe, & # 8221 ; Stauffer noted. & # 8220 ; But unlike Eliot, who responded negatively to the rough worlds of this universe, Williams saw his undertaking as interrupting through limitations and bring forthing new growth. & # 8221 ;

Fox explained how Williams used the imaginativeness to make merely that: & # 8220 ; Williams & # 8230 ; sees the existent map of the imaginativeness as interrupting through the disaffection of the near at manus and resuscitating its wonder. & # 8221 ; Williams himself explained in one of Spring and All & # 8217 ; s prose transitions that & # 8220 ; imaginativeness is non to avoid world, nor is it a description nor an evocation of objects or state of affairss, it is to state that poesy does non fiddle with the universe but moves it & # 8211 ; It affirms world most strongly and hence, since world needs no personal support but exists free from human action, as proven by scientific discipline in the indestructibility of affair and of force, it creates a new object, a drama, a dance which is non a mirror up to nature but & # 8211 ; . & # 8221 ;

Merely as run intoing Pound had measurably affected Williams & # 8217 ; s early life, the visual aspect of Eliot & # 8217 ; s The Waste Land marked of import alterations in his mid-career. Though some of Williams & # 8217 ; s finest poesy appeared in the 1923 Spring and All, he did non let go of another book of verse forms for about 10 old ages. & # 8220 ; One ground, & # 8221 ; speculated Rod Townley, & # 8220 ; was likely Eliot & # 8217 ; s success. Another may hold been his ain success, known merely to a few, in Spring and All. For decennaries thenceforth he could non surpass himself ; some think he ne’er did. & # 8221 ; Alternatively, Williams wrote prose. And in it he concentrated on one topic in peculiar: America.

Williams explained his attractive force towards America in a 1939 missive to Horace Gregory: & # 8220 ; Of assorted lineage I felt from earliest childhood that America was the lone place I could of all time perchance name my ain. I felt that it was expressedly founded for me, personally, and that it must be my first concern in life to possess it. & # 8221 ; He subsequently echoed this sentiment in his foreword to Selected Essays. & # 8220 ; I loved my male parent but ne’er forgave him for staying, in malice of everything, a British topic, & # 8221 ; Williams admitted. & # 8220 ; It had much to make with my sometimes violent partiality towards America. & # 8221 ; As a consequence of such feelings, reasoned Vivienne Koch, & # 8220 ; the logic of Williams & # 8217 ; commitment to the pursuit for a cognition of localism, for a shaping of the American grain, has compelled in his fiction a limitation to American materials. & # 8221 ;

So, in In the American Grain, Williams tried & # 8220 ; to happen out for myself what the land of my more or less inadvertent birth might mean & # 8221 ; by analyzing the & # 8220 ; original records & # 8221 ; of & # 8220 ; some of the American founders. & # 8221 ; In its intervention of the shapers of American history, runing from Columbus to Lincoln, In the American Grain has impressed many as Williams & # 8217 ; s most compendious definition of America and its people. D. H. Lawrence, for illustration, learned from Williams that & # 8220 ; there are two ways of being American, and the head & # 8230 ; is by flinching into single littleness and insentience, and gutting the great continent in crazes of average fright. It is the Puritan manner. The other is by touch ; touch America as she is ; daring to touch her! And this is the heroic way. & # 8221 ; Another prose book of the period, A Ocean trip to Pagany, was a type of travel book based on the writer & # 8217 ; s 1924 trip to Europe. & # 8220 ; While its capable affair is basically Europe, & # 8221 ; informed Koch, & # 8220 ; it is, in world, an appraisal of that universe through the eyes of America too. & # 8221 ; Williams focused straight on America and the Depression in his competently titled short narrative aggregation, The Knife of the Times. In these narratives and in other similar plants of the mid-thirtiess, & # 8220 ; Williams blamed the insufficiencies of American civilization for both the emotional and economic predicament of many of his topics, & # 8221 ; declared James Guimond.

Williams & # 8217 ; s fresh trilogy, White Mule, In the Money, and The Build-Up, besides focused on America, and on one household in peculiar & # 8211 ; his married woman & # 8217 ; s. He foremost conceived the thought for White Mule because he wanted to compose about a babe & # 8211 ; he delivered more than two 1000 in his calling & # 8211 ; and had heard narratives of Floss & # 8217 ; s infancy. But beyond the narrative of the infant Floss Stecher is the narrative of her infant American household, immigrants turning toward success in America. Philip Rahv gave this description of Joe and Gurlie Stecher: & # 8220 ; Gurlie is so prevailing with the natural wits of a married woman that she emerges as a regular goddess of the place, but since it is an American place she is invariably pressing her hubby to acquire into the game, beat the other chap, and do money. Joe & # 8217 ; s chief motive, nevertheless, is his pride of craft ; he is the pure craftsman, the adult male who has non yet been alienated from the merchandise of his labour and who thinks of money as the wages of labour and nil else. & # 8221 ; In In the Money Williams follows Joe as he establishes his ain printing concern and moves to the suburbs, doing manner for the image of middle-class life he presents in The Build-Up. W. T. Schott gave these illustrations of Williams & # 8217 ; s focal point: & # 8220 ; The impassive admirable Joe, the chesty Gurlie on her upward March in society, a neighbour adult female mouth offing her malice, & # 8230 ; Flossie and her sister at their little-girl haggle over bathroom privileges. & # 8221 ; Reed Whittemore felt that such minutes reveal Williams & # 8217 ; s affectionate tolerance of middle-class life. The Build-Up does hold its & # 8220 ; tough subdivisions, & # 8221 ; Whittemore admitted, but & # 8220 ; its placidity is striking for a book written by a long-time literary dissident. What it is is a book of self-satisfied contemplation written from inside apple-pie America. It has non the spirit of the letters of the existent immature doctor-poet sitting in his emptiness 40 old ages earlier in Leipzig & # 8230 ; . Between 1909, so, and the clip of the authorship of The Build-Up WCW was taken indoors, and found that with reserves he liked it there. & # 8221 ;

One reserve Williams may hold had about middle-class America & # 8211 ; and Rutherford in peculiar & # 8211 ; was its response of him as a poet. Few in Rutherford had any consciousness of who Williams-the-poet was, and beyond Rutherford his repute fared no better: even after he had been composing for about 30 old ages, he was still virtually an unknown literary figure. Rod Townley reported a typical public response to his early plants: & # 8220 ; The universe received his 6th and 7th books as it had the five before them, in silence. & # 8221 ; At times, Williams took a resilient position of his ain obscureness. In a 1938 missive to Alva Turner ( one of the many recreational poets with whom he often corresponded ) , Williams assessed the net incomes of the pen: & # 8220 ; Meanwhile I receive in royalties for my last two books the munificent amount of one hundred and thirty dollars & # 8211 ; covering the work of a 10 or 15 twelvemonth period, about 12 dollars a twelvemonth. One must be a difficult worker to be able to stand up under the luxury of those proportions. Nothing but the best for me! & # 8221 ; Beneath the shell of this attitude, though, lay a much angrier Williams. Obviously acrimonious about the success of Eliot and the attending Eliot stole from him and others, Williams wrote, & # 8220 ; Our verse forms invariably, continuously and doltishly were rejected by all the wage magazines except Poetry and The Dial. & # 8221 ; As a consequence, Williams founded and edited several magazines of his ain throughout the thin old ages. Until the 1940s and after, when his work eventually received some popular and critical attending, the magazines provided a little but of import readership.

While the many old ages of authorship may hold gone mostly unnoticed, they were barely spent in vain: Breslin revealed that & # 8220 ; Williams spent some 30 old ages of life and composing in readying for Paterson. & # 8221 ; And though some dismiss the & # 8220 ; epic & # 8221 ; label frequently attached to the five-book verse form, Williams & # 8217 ; s purposes were surely beyond the ordinary. His devotedness to understanding his state, its people, its linguistic communication & # 8211 ; & # 8221 ; the whole cognizable universe about me & # 8221 ; & # 8211 ; found look in the verse form & # 8217 ; s cardinal image, defined by Whittemore as & # 8220 ; the image of the metropolis as a adult male, a adult male lying on his side peopling the topographic point with his thoughts. & # 8221 ; With roots in his 1926 verse form & # 8220 ; Paterson, & # 8221 ; Williams took the metropolis as & # 8220 ; my `case & # 8217 ; to work

up. It called for a poesy such as I did non cognize, it was my responsibility to detect or do such a context on the `thought.’”

In his prefatory notes to the original four-book Paterson, Williams explained & # 8220 ; that a adult male himself is a metropolis, get downing, seeking, accomplishing and reasoning his life in ways which the assorted facets of a metropolis may incarnate & # 8211 ; if imaginatively conceived & # 8211 ; any metropolis, all the inside informations of which may be made to voice his most intimate convictions. & # 8221 ; A. M. Sullivan outlined why Williams chose Paterson, New Jersey: It was one time & # 8220 ; the paradigm of the American industrial community & # 8230 ; the self-sufficient metropolis of accomplishments with the competitory energy and moral staying power to raise the loads of the citizen and raise the support with societal and cultural benefits. & # 8221 ; One hundred old ages subsequently, continued Sullivan, & # 8220 ; Williams saw the Hamilton construct [ of `The Society of Useful Manufacturers ‘ ] realized, but with assorted consequences of success and wretchedness. The poet of Paterson understood the cogency of the hopes of Hamilton but besides recognized that the metropolis slum could be the monetary value of advancement in a mechanised society. & # 8221 ; The universe Williams chose to research in this verse form about & # 8220 ; the myth of American power, & # 8221 ; added James Guimond, was one where & # 8220 ; this power is about wholly evil, the destructive manufacturer of an America grown hapless and tragic, brutalized by inequality, disorganized by industrial pandemonium, and faced with annihilation. & # 8221 ;

Williams revealed & # 8220 ; the elemental character of the topographic point & # 8221 ; in Book I. The clip is spring, the season of creativeness, and Paterson is struck by the desire to show his & # 8220 ; immediate vicinity & # 8221 ; clearly, observed Guimond. The procedure is a battle: to cognize the universe about him Paterson must confront both the beauty of the Passaic Falls and the poorness of the part. In Book II, said Williams, Paterson moves from a description of & # 8220 ; the elemental character & # 8221 ; of the metropolis to its & # 8220 ; modern replicas. & # 8221 ; Or, as Guimond pointed out, from the & # 8220 ; aesthetic universe & # 8221 ; to the & # 8220 ; existent stuff universe where he must carry through the poet & # 8217 ; s undertaking as defined in Book I & # 8211 ; the innovation of a linguistic communication for his vicinity & # 8230 ; . The dislocation of the poet & # 8217 ; s communicating with his universe is a catastrophe, & # 8221 ; both for himself and for others. Williams himself, on the other manus, made his ain progress in communicating in Book II, a & # 8220 ; milestone & # 8221 ; in his development as a poet. A transition in Section 3, get downing & # 8220 ; The descent beckons & # 8230 ; , & # 8221 ; & # 8220 ; brought about & # 8211 ; without recognizing it at the clip & # 8211 ; my concluding construct of what my ain poesy should be. & # 8221 ; The section is one of the earliest illustrations of Williams & # 8217 ; s advanced method of line division, the & # 8220 ; variable foot. & # 8221 ;

To contrive the new linguistic communication, Paterson must first & # 8220 ; descend from the eruditeness and fastidiousness that made him impotent in Book II, & # 8221 ; summarized Guimond. As Paterson reads & # 8211 ; and reflects & # 8211 ; in a library, he accepts the devastation in Book II, rejects his acquisition, and realizes & # 8220 ; a winter of `death & # 8217 ; must come before spring. & # 8221 ; Williams believed that & # 8220 ; if you are traveling to compose realistically of the construct of crud in the universe it can & # 8217 ; t be pretty. & # 8221 ; And so, Book IV is the dead season, symbolized by the & # 8220 ; river below the falls, & # 8221 ; the contaminated Passaic. But in this devastation, the poet workss some seeds of reclamation: a immature virtuous nurse ; a Paterson poet, Allen Ginsburg, who has promised to give the local new significance ; Madame Curie, & # 8220 ; divorced from neither the male nor knowledge. & # 8221 ; At the decision of Book IV, a adult male, after a long swim, dresses on shore and caputs inland & # 8211 ; & # 8221 ; toward Camden, & # 8221 ; Williams said, & # 8220 ; where Walt Whitman, much traduced, lived the ulterior old ages of his life and died. & # 8221 ; These seeds of hope led Breslin to comprehend the basic difference between Paterson and Williams & # 8217 ; s long-time Nemesis, Eliot & # 8217 ; s Waste Land. & # 8220 ; `The Waste Land & # 8217 ; is a sort of anti-epic, & # 8221 ; Breslin said, & # 8220 ; a verse form in which the pursuit for significance is wholly thwarted and we are left, at the terminal, waiting for the prostration of Western civilisation. Paterson is a pre-epic, demoing that the procedure of decomposition releases forces that can construct a new universe. It confronts, once more and, once more, the savageness of modern-day society, but still affirms a originative seed. Eliot & # 8217 ; s terminal is Williams & # 8217 ; s beginning. & # 8221 ;

Williams scrapped his programs for a four-book William patterson when he recognized non merely the alterations in the universe, but & # 8220 ; that there can be no terminal to such a narrative I have envisioned with the footings which I have laid down for myself. & # 8221 ; To Babette Deutsch, Book V & # 8220 ; is clearly non something added on, like a new wing built to widen a house, but something that grew, every bit of course as a green subdivision stemming from a hardy ole tree & # 8230 ; . This is necessarily a work that reviews the past, but it is besides one that stands steadfastly in the present and looks toward the hereafter & # 8230 ; . `Paterson Five & # 8217 ; is facile of a verve that old age can non slake. Its finest transitions communicate Dr. Williams & # 8217 ; s perennial delectation in walking in the world. & # 8221 ; Book VI was in the planning phases at the clip of Williams & # 8217 ; s decease.

While Williams himself declared that he had received some & # 8220 ; satisfying & # 8221 ; regards about Paterson, Breslin reported & # 8220 ; response of the verse form ne’er precisely realized his hopes for it. & # 8221 ; Paterson & # 8217 ; s Mosaic construction, its capable affair, and its alternating transitions of poesy and prose helped fuel unfavorable judgment about its trouble and its diarrhea of organisation. In the procedure of naming Paterson an & # 8220 ; `Ars Poetica & # 8217 ; for modern-day America, & # 8221 ; Dudley Fitts complained, & # 8220 ; it is a commiseration that those who might profit most from it will necessarily be put off by its obscurenesss and difficulties. & # 8221 ; Breslin, meanwhile, accounted for the verse form & # 8217 ; s obliqueness by stating, & # 8221 ; Paterson has a thickness of texture, a multi-dimensional quality that makes reading it a hard but intense experience. & # 8221 ;

Paterson did assist convey Williams some of the attending he had been losing for many old ages. One award came in 1949 when he was invited to go adviser to the Library of Congress. Whittemore reported that Williams foremost refused the assignment because of hapless wellness, but decided in 1952 that he was ready to presume the station. Unfortunately for Williams, the editor and publishing house of the poesy magazine Lyric got word of Williams & # 8217 ; s assignment and later announced Williams & # 8217 ; s & # 8220 ; Communist & # 8221 ; associations. Williams & # 8217 ; s poem & # 8220 ; Russia, & # 8221 ; she insisted, spoke in & # 8220 ; the very voice of Communism. & # 8221 ; Though few newspapers brought the charges to visible radiation, the Library of Congress all of a sudden backed off from the assignment. After several alibis and delaies, some made, apparently, out of a concern for Williams & # 8217 ; s wellness, Librarian Luther Evans wrote, & # 8220 ; I consequently hereby revoke the offer of assignment heretofore made to you. & # 8221 ; A few months before the term was to hold ended, Williams learned that the assignment had been renewed. The Library

& # 8220 ; Sidelights & # 8221 ;

of Congress, nevertheless, made no offer to widen the assignment through the undermentioned twelvemonth.

While Williams may hold felt abandoned when few came to his defence during the Library of Congress incident, little could hold bolstered him the manner the cult of 3rd coevals poets did when they adopted him as their male parent in poesy. & # 8220 ; Paterson is our Leafs of Grass, & # 8221 ; announced Robert Lowell. & # 8220 ; The times have changed. & # 8221 ; And so they had. The dominant school of poesy, the academic school of Eliot and Allen Tate, was giving manner to what Whittemore called the 1950ss & # 8217 ; & # 8220 ; Revolution of the Word. & # 8221 ; Such poets as Lowell, Allen Ginsburg, Charles Olson, Denise Levertov, Robert Creely, and Cid Corman found in Williams an option to the faculty members. As Bruce Cook explained, Williams & # 8220 ; withstood the influence of Eliot, ignored the New Critics and the academic poets who followed their lead, and merely went his ain manner, his lines turning shorter, more austere, more pointed with each poem. & # 8221 ; With this manner, reported James Dickey, he appealed to many draw a bead oning authors who looked at his work and said, & # 8220 ; Well if that & # 8217 ; s poesy, I believe I might be able to compose it excessively! & # 8221 ; But while the younger poets, including the Beats, found a prophesier, a male parent, and a personal friend in Williams, the old maestro was no easy critic. & # 8220 ; It was Williams who told Ginsberg that `Howl & # 8217 ; needed film editing by half, & # 8221 ; disclosed Linda Wagner. & # 8220 ; It was Williams who argued with Denise Levertov about her sometimes too-poetic dict

Harmonizing to Williams himself, his ain particular gift to the new poets was his & # 8220 ; variable pes & # 8211 ; the division of the line harmonizing to a new method that would be satisfactory to an American. & # 8221 ; He revealed his enthusiasm over the variable pes in a 1955 missive to John Thirlwall: & # 8220 ; As far as I know, as my extroverted book [ Journey to Love ] makes clear, I shall utilize no other signifier for the remainder of my life, for it represents the apogee of all my nisus after an flight from the limitations of all the poetry of the past. & # 8221 ; Breslin, meanwhile, downplayed Williams & # 8217 ; s exuberance: & # 8220 ; A reader coming to these verse forms [ in The Desert Music and Other Poems ] across the whole class of Williams & # 8217 ; s development will acknowledge that the new line is merely one manifestation of a permeant displacement of manner and point of view. & # 8221 ; Whittemore, excessively, while announcing Williams as a prophesier in the & # 8220 ; Revolution of the Word, & # 8221 ; de-emphasized the function of the variable pes: & # 8220 ; In other words the variable pes represented a alteration in temper more than measure. & # 8221 ;

Williams & # 8217 ; s wellness histories for a major alteration in temper. In the late fortiess he suffered the first of several bosom onslaughts and shots which would blight him for the remainder of his life. And though Williams subsequently complained of the effects of a peculiarly serious shot ( 1952 ) & # 8211 ; & # 8221 ; That was the terminal. I was through with life & # 8221 ; & # 8211 ; his devotedness to poetry did non endure. Breslin reported that after retiring from medical specialty in 1951, and after recovering from a shot, Williams spoke & # 8220 ; optimistically of the `opportunity for idea & # 8217 ; and reading afforded by his new idleness. & # 8221 ; Hofstadter pointed out that & # 8220 ; decease was a major focal point of this reflectivity, & # 8221 ; and explained how Williams reflected his concerns in his poesy: & # 8220 ; In the face of decease what Williams seeks is renewal & # 8211 ; non a release toward another universe but an intensified return to this 1. Revitalization both of one & # 8217 ; s interior energies and of one & # 8217 ; s contact with the outside universe, reclamation is the merchandise of two forces: love and the imaginativeness & # 8230 ; . Love and imaginativeness are the kernel of life. He who loses them is every bit good as dead. & # 8221 ;

Williams explored the subject of renewed love in two peculiar subsequently works, the drama A Dream of Love and the verse form & # 8220 ; Asphodel, That Greeny Flower. & # 8221 ; In A Dream of Love the supporter has an matter with his secretary and confesses to his married woman that he did it merely to & # 8220 ; regenerate our love. & # 8221 ; The account fails to convert her. Therefore, Williams dramatizes his belief in the & # 8220 ; struggle between the male & # 8217 ; s need for emotional reclamation in love and the female & # 8217 ; s need for stability in love, & # 8221 ; explained Guimond. Harmonizing to Thomas Whitaker, & # 8220 ; `A Dream of Love & # 8217 ; points to an actuality that Williams at this clip could non to the full face but that he would larn to confront & # 8211 ; most perceptibly in `Asphodel, That Greeny Flower. & # 8217 ; & # 8221 ; In this & # 8220 ; elegiac epithalamian, & # 8221 ; Williams confesses his unfaithfulnesss to his married woman and asks for her forgiveness ; & # 8220 ; he seeks new life on the really border of decease, & # 8221 ; said Whitaker. While Williams proclaimed his life as a hubby in his love verse form, his strength as a poet was apparent, excessively: & # 8220 ; Asphodel & # 8221 ; received some really complimentary reappraisals, including W. H. Auden & # 8217 ; s congratulations as & # 8220 ; one of the most beautiful verse forms in the language. & # 8221 ;

& # 8220 ; Asphodel & # 8221 ; was among several of Williams & # 8217 ; s extremely honored subsequently works. Prior to his 1952 shot he had been under a taxing three-book contract at Random House, a contract he fulfilled with The Build Up, Autobiography, and Make Light of It. The hurried authorship of the Autobiography, evidenced by its many factual errors, every bit good as the concern over the Library of Congress fiasco, have both been cited as lending factors in his worsening wellness.

But Williams & # 8217 ; s weakened physical powers, seemingly, strengthened his originative 1s. & # 8220 ; I think he did much better work after the shot slowed him down, & # 8221 ; reflected Flossie. Stanley Koehler agreed. The Desert Music and Journey to Love, he said, & # 8220 ; were written in an unusual period of recovery of originative power after Dr. Williams & # 8217 ; s foremost serious unwellness in 1952. & # 8221 ; Aside from having the variable pes and such outstanding verse forms as & # 8220 ; Asphodel, & # 8221 ; these two books impressed readers as the mature work of a poet really much in control of his life and trade. Reviewing Desert Music, Kenneth Rexroth called the rubric verse form & # 8220 ; an expressed statement of the irreducible humaneness of the human being. & # 8221 ; The book & # 8217 ; s thoughts are & # 8220 ; simple, incontestable, presented with unagitated adulthood, & # 8221 ; continued Rexroth. & # 8220 ; I prophesy that from now on, as Williams grows older, he will lift as far above his coevalss as Yeats did in his later years. & # 8221 ; The love verse form of Journey to Love were no less impressive to Babette Deutsch. & # 8220 ; The poet gives us sketchs of the day-to-day scene, notations on the humanistic disciplines, avowals of a faith no less sublime for being secular, in the linguistic communication, the beat, that he has made his ain, & # 8221 ; reported Deutsch. & # 8220 ; The pages bear the unerasable signature of his honestness, his compassion, his courage. & # 8221 ; Finally, to foreground a decennary of productiveness, Williams & # 8217 ; s last book, Pictures From Brueghel, won a Pulitzer Prize in 1963.

Despite his neglecting wellness, Williams lived every bit fruitfully as possible throughout his ulterior old ages. He traveled, gave talks, and entertained authors in the same place that had been visited by members of the Imagist motion more than forty old ages earlier. Williams wrote, excessively & # 8211 ; poesy, of class, every bit good as essays and short narratives. He continued to collaborate with authors interested in him and his work: John Thirlwall worked with him in the publication of Selected Letters and a series of treatments with Edith Heal became the & # 8220 ; autobiography & # 8221 ; of his plants, I Wanted to Write a Poem. A partly paralysing shot in 1958 and a 1959 malignant neoplastic disease operation, nevertheless, stole much of his staying energy and capablenesss. No longer able to read, by the terminal of the decennary he depended on Floss to read to him, frequently every bit long as four hours a twenty-four hours. A peculiarly painful position of the aging Williams appeared in his 1962 interview with Stanley Koehler for the Paris Review. & # 8220 ; The attempt it took the poet to happen and articulate words can barely be indicated here, & # 8221 ; reported Koehler. Continued neglecting wellness farther slowed Williams until, on March 4, 1963, he died in his slumber.

Bibliography

Further READINGS ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Book

& # 183 ; Ahearn, Barry, William Carlos Williams and Alterity: The Early Poetry, Cambridge University Press, 1994.

& # 183 ; Angoff, Charles, editor, William Carlos Williams ( documents by four critics ) , Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1974.

& # 183 ; Axelrod, Steven Gould, and Helen Deese, Critical Essays on William Carlos Williams, MacMillan, 1994.

& # 183 ; Berry, S. L. , William Carlos Williams, Creative Education, 1997.

& # 183 ; Breslin, James E. , William Carlos Williams: An American Artist, Oxford University Press, 1970.

& # 183 ; Brinnin, John Malcolm, William Carlos Williams, University of Minnesota Press, 1963.

& # 183 ; Cambon, Glauco, The Inclusive Fire: Surveies in American Poetry, Indiana University Press, 1963.

& # 183 ; Cirasa, Robert J. , The Lost Works of William Carlos Williams: The Volumes of Collected Poerty as Lyrical Sequences, Associated University Presses, 1995.

& # 183 ; Coles, Robert, William Carlos Williams: The Knack of Survival in America, Rutgers University Press, 1975.

& # 183 ; Comens, Bruce, Apocalypse and After: Modern Strategy and Postmodern Tactics in Pound, Williams, and Zukofsky, University of Alabama Press, 1995.

& # 183 ; Conarroe, Joel, & # 8220 ; Paterson & # 8221 ; : Language and Landscape, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1970.

& # 183 ; Concise Dictionary of American Literary Biography: The Twentiess, 1917-1929, Gale, 1989.

& # 183 ; Contemporary Literary Criticism, Gale, Volume 1, 1973 ; Volume 2, 1974 ; Volume 5, 1976 ; Volume 9, 1978 ; Volume 13, 1980 ; Volume 22, 1982 ; Volume 42, 1987 ; Volume 67, 1991.

& # 183 ; Cook, Bruce, The Beat Generation, Scribner, 1971.

& # 183 ; Cushman, Stephen, William Carlos Williams and the Meanings of Measure, Yale University Press, 1985.

& # 183 ; Dekle, Bernard, Profiles of Modern American Authors, Tuttle, 1969.

& # 183 ; Deutsch, Babette, Poetry in Our Time, Holt, 1952.

& # 183 ; Dickey, James, Babel to Byzantium, Farrar, Straus, 1968.

& # 183 ; Dictionary of Literary Biography, Gale, Volume 4: American Writers in Paris, 1920-1939, 1980 ; Volume 16: The Beat generations: Literary Gypsies in Postwar America, 1983, Volume 54: American Poets, 1880- 1945, Third Series, 1987, Volume 86: American Short Story Writers, 1910-1945, First Series, Gale, 1989.

& # 183 ; Dijkstra, Bram, The Hieroglyphics of a New Address: Cubism, Stieglitz, and the Early Poetry of William Carlos Williams, Princeton University Press, 1969.

& # 183 ; Donoghue, Denis, The Ordinary Universe, Macmillan, 1968.

& # 183 ; Doyle, Charles, ed. , William Carlos Williams: The Critical Heritage, Routledge & A ; Kegan Paul, 1980.

& # 183 ; Driscoll, Kerry, William Carlos Williams and the Maternal Muse, UMI Research Press, 1987.

& # 183 ; Duffy, Bernard, Poetry in America: Expression and Its Valuess in the Times of Bryant, Whitman, and Pound, Duke University Press, 1978.

& # 183 ; Ellman, Richard and Robert O & # 8217 ; Clair, editors, The Norton Anthology of Modern Poetry, Norton, 1973.

& # 183 ; Engels, John, Guide to William Carlos Williams, Merrill, 1969.

& # 183 ; Flinn, Anthony, Approaching Authority: Transpersonal Gestures in the Poetry of Yeats, Eliot, and Williams, Bucknell University Press, 1997.

& # 183 ; Gregory, Elizabeth, Quotation and Modern American Poetry: Fanciful Gardens with Real Toads, Rice University Press, 1995.

& # 183 ; Guimond, James, The Art of William Carlos Williams: A Discovery and Possession of America, University of Illinois Press, 1968.

& # 183 ; Halter, Peter, The Revolution in the Visual Arts and the Poetry of William Carlos Williams, Cambridge University Press, 1994.

& # 183 ; Hartman, Charles, Free Poetry: An Essay on Prosody, Northwestern University Press ( Evanston, Il. ) , 1996.

& # 183 ; Jarrell, Randall, Poetry and the Age, Knopf-Vintage, 1953.

& # 183 ; Jarrell, The Third Book of Criticism, Farrar, Straus, 1969.

& # 183 ; Kinnahan, Linda A. , Poetics of Feminine: Authority and Literary Tradition in William Carlos Williams, Mina Loy, Denise Levertov, and Kathleen Fraser, Cambridge University Press, 1994.

& # 183 ; Koch, Vivienne, William Carlos Williams, New Directions, 1950.

& # 183 ; Koehler, Stanley, Countries of the Mind: The Poetry of William Carlos Williams, Bucknell University Press, 1998.

& # 183 ; Larson, Kelli A. , Guide to the Poetry of William Carlos Williams, Prentice-Hall, 1995.

& # 183 ; Laughlin, James, Remembering William Carlos Williams, New Directions, 1995.

& # 183 ; Lenhart, Gary, The Teachers & A ; Writers Guide to William Carlos Williams, Teachers & A ; Writers Collaborative, 1998.

& # 183 ; Lowney, John, The American Avant-Garde Tradition: William Carlos Williams, Postmodern Poetry, and the Politicss of Cultural Memory, Bucknell University Press, 1996.

& # 183 ; Malkoff, Karl, Escape From the Self: A Study in Contemporary Poetry and Poetics, Columbia University Press, 1977.

& # 183 ; Mariani, Paul L. , William Carlos Williams: The Poet and His Critics, American Library Association, 1975.

& # 183 ; Markos, Donald W. , Ideas in Things: The Poems of William Carlos Williams, Associated University Presses ( London ) , 1994.

& # 183 ; Marsh, Alec, Money and Modernity: Pound, Williams, and the Spirit of Jefferson, University of Alabama Press, 1998.

& # 183 ; Marzan, Julio, The Spanish American Roots of William Carlos Williams, University of Texas Press, 1994.

& # 183 ; Mazzaro, Jerome, William Carlos Williams: The Later Poems, Cornell University Press, 1973.

& # 183 ; Mester, Terri A. , Movement and Modernism: Yeats, Eliot, Lawrence, Williams, and Early Twentieth-century Dance, University of Arkansas Press, 1997.

& # 183 ; Miller, J. Hillis, Poets of Reality: Six Twentieth-Century Writers, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1965.

& # 183 ; Miller, J. Hillis, editor, William Carlos Williams: A Collection of Critical Essays, Prentice-Hall, 1966.

& # 183 ; Morris, Daniel, The Writings of William Carlos Williams: Promotion for the Self, University of Missouri Press, 1995.

& # 183 ; Nardi, Marcia, The Last Word: Letterss Between Marcia Nardi and William Carlos Williams, University of Iowa Press, 1994.

& # 183 ; Ostrom, Alan, The Poetic World of William Carlos Williams, Southern Illinois University Press, 1966.

& # 183 ; Owen, Guy, editor, Modern American Poetry: Essaies in Criticism, Everett/Edwards, 1972.

& # 183 ; Paul, Sherman, The Music of Survival: A Biography of a Poem by William Carlos Williams, University of Illinois Press, 1968.

& # 183 ; Perkins, David, A History of Modern Poetry: From the 1890 & # 8217 ; s to the High Modernist Mode, Harvard University Press, 1976.

& # 183 ; Peterson, Walter S. , An Approach to & # 8220 ; Paterson, & # 8221 ; Yale University Press, 1967.

& # 183 ; Poetry Criticism, Gale, Vol. 7, pp. 343-413.

& # 183 ; Qian, Zhaoming, Orientalism and Modernisn: The Legacy of China in Pound and Williams, Duke University Press, 1995.

& # 183 ; Rexroth, Kenneth, American Poetry in the Twentieth Century, Herder, 1971.

& # 183 ; Riddel, Joseph N. , The Inverted Bell: Modernism and the Counterpoetics of William Carlos Williams, Louisiana State University Press, 1974.

& # 183 ; Rodgers, Audrey T. , The Image of Women in the Poetry of William Carlos Williams, Gordian Press, 1966.

& # 183 ; Rosenthal, M. L. , The Modern Poets: A Critical Introduction, Oxford University Press, 1960.

& # 183 ; Shapiro, Karl, In Defense of Ignorance, Random House, 1960.

& # 183 ; Simpson, Louis, Three on the Tower: The Lifes and Works of Ezra Pound, T.S. Eliot and William Carlos Williams, Morrow, 1975.

& # 183 ; Stauffer, Donald Barlow, A Short History of American Poetry, Dutton, 1974.

& # 183 ; Sutton, Walter, American Free Verse: The Modern Revolution in Poetry, New Directions, 1973.

& # 183 ; Townley, Rod, The Early Poetry of William Carlos Williams, Cornell University Press, 1975.

& # 183 ; Ungar, Leonard, editor, Seven Modern American Poets: An Introduction, University of Minnesota Press, 1967.

& # 183 ; Waggoner, Hyatt H. , American Poetry From the Puritans to the Present, Houghton, 1968.

& # 183 ; Wagner, Linda Welshimer, editor, Interviews With William Carlos Williams: & # 8220 ; Talking Straight Ahead, & # 8221 ; New Directions, 1976.

& # 183 ; Wagner, The Poems of William Carlos Williams, Wesleyan University Press, 1964.

& # 183 ; Wagner, The Prose of William Carlos Williams, Wesleyan University Press, 1970.

& # 183 ; Wagner, William Carlos Williams: A Reference Guide, G. K. Hall, 1978.

& # 183 ; Weatherhead, A. Kingsley, The Edge of the Image: Marianne Moore, William Carlos Williams, and Some Other Poets, University of Washington Press, 1967.

& # 183 ; Weaver, Mike, William Carlos Williams: The American Background, Cambridge University Press, 1971.

& # 183 ; Whitaker, Thomas R. , William Carlos Williams, Twayne, 1968.

& # 183 ; Whittemore, Reed, William Carlos Williams: Poet From New Jersey, Houghton, 1975.

& # 183 ; Williams, William Carlos, The Autobiography of William Carlos Williams, New Directions, 1967.

& # 183 ; Williams, Imaginations, edited by Webster Schott, New Directions, 1970.

& # 183 ; Williams, Paterson, Books I-V, New Directions, 1963.

& # 183 ; Williams, Selected Essays, Random House, 1954.

& # 183 ; Williams, Selected Letters, edited by John C. Thirlwall, McDowell, Obolensky, 1957.

& # 183 ; Writers at Work: The Paris Review Interviews, 3rd series, debut by Alfred Kazin, Viking, 1967.

Periodicals

& # 183 ; American Imago, Spring, 1993.

& # 183 ; The American Poetry Review, September-October, 1985.

& # 183 ; Atlantic Monthly, October, 1951 ; September, 1957 ; May, 1958 ; July, 1959.

& # 183 ; Boundary 2, Winter, 1981.

& # 183 ; Briarcliff Quarterly, October, 1946.

& # 183 ; Christian Science Monitor, April 10, 1958 ; November 14 1970.

& # 183 ; Commonweal, October 4, 1946 ; November 7, 1952 ; December 10, 1954.

& # 183 ; Criticism, Winter, 1972.

& # 183 ; The Dial, November, 1928.

& # 183 ; Encounter, December, 1971.

& # 183 ; English Journal, November, 1987.

& # 183 ; English Literary History, Winter, 1986.

& # 183 ; Explicator, Fall, 1976.

& # 183 ; Hudson Review, Winter, 1961-62.

& # 183 ; Illustrated London News, March 16, 1963.

& # 183 ; Journal of Modern Literature, September, 1976 ; July, 1985 ; Summer, 1987.

& # 183 ; Kenyon Review, Summer, 1952 ; Spring, 1959.

& # 183 ; Lancet, July 10, 1993.

& # 183 ; Library Journal, February 1, 1994, p. 77 ; March 15, 1996, p. 71.

& # 183 ; London Magazine, June/July, 1974.

& # 183 ; Los Angeles Times Book Review, October 17, 1982.

& # 183 ; Massachusetts Review, Winter, 1962.

& # 183 ; Modern Poetry Studies, 1970.

& # 183 ; Mosiac, Winter, 1987.

& # 183 ; Nation, April 4, 1926 ; March 28, 1934 ; June 26, 1937 ; November 19, 1938 ; November 23, 1940 ; April 14, 1945 ; August 24, 1946 ; June 19, 1948 ; July 9, 1949 ; April 8, 1950 ; March 3, 1951 ; August 25, 1951 ; November 8, 1952 ; April 24, 1954 ; January 22, 1955 ; October 5, 1957 ; May 31, 1958 ; November 23, 1970 ; December 14, 1970 ; December 11, 1976.

& # 183 ; National Review, March 26, 1963.

& # 183 ; The New Criterion, September, 1988.

& # 183 ; New Leader, June 9, 1975.

& # 183 ; New Republic, March 24, 1926 ; April 18, 1934 ; July 15, 1936 ; July 7, 1937 ; December 21, 1938 ; November 18, 1940 ; February 12, 1945 ; February 24, 1951 ; August 27, 1951 ; February 7, 1955 ; November 13, 1961 ; December 20, 1970.

& # 183 ; New Statesman and Society, March 6, 1992.

& # 183 ; Newsweek, March 16, 1963.

& # 183 ; New York Herald Tribune Book Review, June 27, 1948 ; March 5, 1950 ; December 3, 1950 ; December 17, 1950 ; July 1, 1951 ; September 16, 1951 ; November 2, 1952 ; March 28, 1954 ; November 7, 1954 ; November 13, 1955 ; September 1, 1957 ; July 6, 1958 ; September 28, 1958 ; June 21, 1959.

& # 183 ; New York Review of Books, November 13, 1975.

& # 183 ; New York Times, February 7, 1926 ; September 30, 1928 ; February 18, 1934 ; November 15, 1936 ; June 20, 1937 ; July 23, 1939 ; November 7, 1954 ; December 18, 1955 ; September 1, 1957 ; April 13, 1958 ; September 14, 1958 ; October 25, 1966 ; October 20, 1984.

& # 183 ; New York Times Book Review, June 28, 1959 ; December 26, 1971 ; October 5, 1975 ; September 18, 1983 ; January 4, 1987 ; April 3, 1994.

& # 183 ; The Ohio Review, 1987.

& # 183 ; Partisan Review, November-December, 1951.

& # 183 ; Perspective, Autumn-Winter, 1953.

& # 183 ; Philological Quarterly, Fall, 1986.

& # 183 ; Poesis, 1985.

& # 183 ; Poetry, May, 1934 ; May, 1936 ; November, 1936 ; September, 1939 ; April, 1945 ; February, 1947 ; April, 1949 ; May, 1952 ; April, 1954 ; March, 1955 ; March, 1956 ; June, 1958 ; May, 1959 ; February, 1964 ; October, 1967.

& # 183 ; Raritan, Winter, 1987.

& # 183 ; Saturday Review, December 19, 1925 ; May 7, 1932 ; June 26, 1937 ; March 19, 1938 ; February 11, 1939 ; November 9, 1940 ; September 25, 1948 ; October 9, 1948 ; August 20, 1949 ; May 20, 1950 ; December 9, 1950 ; September 21, 1951 ; October 20, 1951 ; March 15, 1952 ; October 18, 1952 ; June 5, 1954 ; November 20, 1954 ; February 18, 1956 ; September 7, 1957 ; October 11

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

x

Hi!
I'm Katy

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out