Would Russian Revolution. Would The Revolution Still Have Occurred If World War One Didn T? Essay, Research Paper

The 1917 revolution in Russia was a true show of the people s choler. For old ages, the subjugation that they suffered at the custodies of the out-dated autarchy had left them with tonss of energy to let go of, but with really small room to liberate it. The start of World War One was seen as a God-send for the Tsar, for it distracted the Russians from their unqualified swayer, and united them all against a common enemy: the Germans. However, Nicholas alleviation was short lived, for his failure in being a good head-of-state was more than over shadowed by his gross deficiency of military accomplishments. The Russians choler boiled over when intelligence of lay waste toing lickings reached the metropolis, and Tsar Nicholas 11 finally abdicated from the throne, stoping the state s bossy regulation. World War One was instrumental in the revolution s success, but if the war had non occurred, would the Romanovs still be governing today?

First, allow s see what facts would back up this theory: Stolypin, who was Russia s Prime Minister during rather a volatile period, was keen on the thought of assisting the people of his state, while still desiring to keep the autarchy s regulation. First away, he abolished the much hated salvation payments, which gave the liberated helot more freedom with their money and clip. This was a echt attempt to delight the provincials, therefore hopefully cut downing the chance of a revolution. Not merely did he make this, about he besides set up a clever program to construct a category of rich husbandmans, known as the Kulak category. These husbandmans would be at that place to squelch any revolution thoughts and tensenesss, therefore extinguishing the menace of any kind of rebellion. This scheme was designed to undertake the revolution from its roots, alternatively of working from the top, all the manner down to the underside.

Russia had awful on the job conditions, which could frequently go forth employees without the right figure of fingers on their custodies. To rectify this, inspectors were given legal power over mills. These people were at that place to see that the new criterions in occupational safety were being observed. In 1912, the workers were offered their first insurance strategy, incase they lost any limbs in their house s machines. All of this quelled the turning defeat among the workers, who d at last received the protection that they had needed for old ages.

The one time f

ormidable revolution parties, like the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks, had lost their steam. Powerful leaders like Lenin were in expatriate from Russia, and to add abuse to injury, most of the popular support that they had enjoyed earlier in the century was gone, as was their money. All of the above factors support the theory that the revolution would non hold occurred if World War One hadn T either.

The major statement against this hypothesis was Nicholas 11, the adult male himself. He was an highly obstinate leader who failed to understand the demands of his people ( and the chief ground he didn t understand was because he didn T want to ) . As demonstrated with his deft handling of the October Manifesto, Nicholas had a wont of giving the people merely every bit much as was needed to maintain them quiet. Equally shortly as their noises died down, he d take it all off from them once more. It would hold taken old ages to undo the harm caused by Alexandra and Rasputin, and his conservative attitude to his governing surely didn T aid to squelch any of the radical tensenesss among the Russians. That was all left up to Stolypin, who, despite being an intelligent and comparatively caring individual, still failed to give the people what they wanted.

Stolypin s much touted land reforms didn t get every bit far as he had wanted. The peasant population was increasing at excessively fast a rate for his Kulak category to decently develop, and this quickly increasing population wasn t bring forthing adequate nutrient to feed itself. Even though farm productiveness was up, it wasn t lifting promptly plenty to get by with the tremendous consumer base. Russians were hungering once more. To vent off their choler at his failed promises, Stolypin was assassinated by revolution militants, while go toing a theatre public presentation. A good balance between radical and bossy swayer, he was a adult male who possibly, if given more power to play with and a longer life span, may hold halted to events of 1917.

All up, I believe that the war did rush up the 1917 revolution, but that was all it did, velocity it up. Even with the betterments, the Russians were really displeased with the manner that their lived were being run, and it would merely hold been a affair of clip before the Bolsheviks & A ; the Mensheviks got their act together, and over-through the autarchy. I think it s safe to state that by the mid 1920 s, Nicholas would hold made a big adequate blooper, to light the fire of revolution for one concluding clip.