A Hero Of Our Time Essay, Research Paper

There are many ways to state a narrative and Mikhail Lermontov was able to use the usage of

narrative voice and it? s many utilizations in A Hero of Our Time. With his utilizations he is able to paint

a image of the book? s anti-hero, Pechorin and edify the reader on the character of a

disturbed adult male. This adult male is scarred in some ways from life and does non cognize how to cover

with the cicatrixs life has dealt him.

This inability is first shown in the narrative of Maxim Maximych. Maxim recounts

his narrative of run intoing Pechorin to the traveller, who is the chief storyteller at the beginning of

the book. Maxim has many narratives of Pechorin but the chief one being about Bela.

Bela was acquired from Bela? s brother, Azamat for a beautiful Equus caballus that didn? t even

belong to Pechorin but to another adult male in Pechorin? s station. This trade says a couple things

about human behavior. On Azamat? s side there is the fact that his greed has control over

his actions which leads to him giving over household for an animate being that in his eyes is a more

valuable friend than his sister. Pechorin sees this and so from the beginning of the novel

we can state Pechorin is a maestro operator who preys on the weak of the universe.

Pechorin from the beginning is relentless in holding Bela love him. She at first is immune

but easy grows more so. But so a awful thing comes to go through. Bela begins to decease.

Pechorin realizes early on that he can non make anything to salvage her but he tries to anyhow.

This is in portion because he wants to hold a clear scruples about her decease since in many

ways he changed her life everlastingly. Maxim makes a remark on this continuity by stating:

? He was like that. He? d acquire something into his caput and non be content boulder clay he

got it. ? 1

This continuity is a character trait that is in the terminal portion of his ain ruin.

When Bela dies Maxim says:

? His face showed me nil peculiar, and that annoyed me. If I? d been in

his topographic point I? vitamin Ds have died of heartache & # 8230 ; I wanted to comfort him, more for decency? s

interest, you understand, than anything else. But when I spoke he lifted up his

caput and laughed. The laugh sent cold trembles down my spinal column. ? 2

There are many grounds why Pechorin? s laugh might hold sent trembles down

Maxim? s spinal column. Maxim would likely believe that Pechorin is a cold adult male with no existent

emotions. But I think that the adult male tungsten

Ho could ne’er love has lost person that he loves

and he might non cognize how to manage the emotions that are welling up indoors of him. At

the same clip he is recognizing that he can non make everything and that deep down indoors he is

merely human and that he can non make everything. And for person like Pechorin, a maestro

politician it is a difficult thing to get down. Possibly Maxim realizes this but from what Maxim

Tells us he shows Pechorin as a cold homo being in many respects but unwittingly he has

shown us a adult male with a psyche.

Of class this psyche could be debated with the narrative of Princess Mary that is told by

Pechorin in his diary. Princess Mary is a socialite and really popular of class. Along

comes Pechorin to steal her boom. He tells glorious narratives and diss her subtly by

stealing off her audience. She of class wants to cognize who this adult male who comes in so

courageously to dispute her popularity is.

Gradually they become friends but he still insults her sometimes by disregarding her

when she comes by. This lone makes her want him more. And this is what Pechorin wants

because he watches Grushnitsky, a possible suer to the princess, fail at playing the game

of love affair. Therefore he wants to demo Grushnitsky off as a hypocrite who is truly a

botching imbecile and non a debonair adult male.

When Grushnitsky is shown off by Pechorin he is shown as a sap. So to protect

his honor he challenges Pechorin to a affaire d’honneur. Pechorin finds out that the guns in the affaire d’honneur

will be rigged to mortify him. Pechorin comes up with a program of his ain to get the better of

Grushnitsky. What he ends up making is killing Grushnitsky. This shocks all of the

looker-ons. But in world eliminate the bad participant of the group.

When Pechorin returns to the town he finds out what he has assumed. Princess

Mary loves him. He goes to her and tells her that he does non return the love. Of class

we do non of all time cognize if Pechorin truly loved her but at the terminal of the book you find him

to be a dark, average individual without a psyche.

As Pechorin portions some of his ideas throughout the novel every bit good as the other

character? s sentiment of him, we are given a image that does non do sense. We are ne’er

given a full sense of who Pechorin truly is. But possibly that is what Mikhail Lermontov is

seeking to state, that we can ne’er truly cognize a individual, know affair how good we know

him or her.