A Two Tale Comparison Essay, Research Paper

& # 65279 ; A Two Tale Comparison

Thinking back to our childhood, we all remember hearing many sorts of fairy narratives. Some

of them inspired us others confused us, and most of them taught us valuable lessons. Through out

centuries narratives and narratives have been used as a valuable tool to go through on our civilization to new

coevalss. There is a strong belief that these fairy narratives mirror and influence society. All civilizations

interpret narratives in their ain alone manner. They add and subtract assorted facets of the narrative to suit the

demands of their peculiar society. The same narrative in the United States is different from the narrative told

in Asia. A good illustration of tale development can be seen in one of the most celebrated narratives of all time told

which is & # 8220 ; Cinderella & # 8221 ; . As a professor of adult females & # 8217 ; s history Karol Kelley points out in her essay

Pretty Woman: A Modern Cinderella & # 8220 ; There are some 700 versions of Cinderella & # 8221 ; .This fairy narrative

as many others has been altering for many old ages, and in recent old ages Cinderella has come under

some unfavorable judgment for its word picture of adult females & # 8217 ; s functions in society.

In present twenty-four hours society, where political rightness and equality are at the top of the

precedence list, by reading essays such as the one by Karol Kelley we find that this might non hold

been the instance in earlier yearss. Fairy narratives such as Cinderella have been found guilty of possessing

subliminal socialisation traits. Classifying genders as inferior and modeling immature misss into the

female that society expects them to be. In Charles Perrault & # 8217 ; s version, which is considered the most

common, Cinderella is seen as inactive, limited, dependent and inferior. As critics argue, these

traits can impede a kid & # 8217 ; s self esteem. Karol Kelley provinces that the & # 8220 ; outlooks and the promises

of the Cinderella narrative are psychologically harmful to women. & # 8221 ; ( p648 ) . The fact that Cinderella is

a limited character may give the miss an feeling that she should be happy with what she has

and non hold any or aspirations in her life. That is, until her Prince comes to deliver her. Since

these remarks were made, the Cinderella narrative has been modified and changed. In order to see

how gender functions have changed in faery narratives from the old to the new, allow & # 8217 ; s compare the authoritative

version of Cinderella by Charles Perrault to a recent version which is a film that was released in

1998 called & # 8220 ; Ever After & # 8221 ; which was directed by Andy Tennant. Even though there are some

similarities in the manner they classify gender, a important attempt has been made in the film & # 8220 ; Ever

After & # 8221 ; to overhaul the narrative and alter the manner adult females are portrayed.

One of the traditional stereotypes that is apparent in the authoritative version of Cinderella is the

inactive nature of the miss. Cinderella & # 8217 ; s step-mother and her step-sisters invariably mistreat her

which would usually do a individual to respond in a rebellious and aggressive manner. This is non the

instance in this state of affairs. Cinderella absorbs and suppresses the choler, and ne’er lets it show. She

continues to be loveable and caring. & # 8220 ; People would express joy if they saw a Cinderbottom at the ball & # 8221 ;

Charles Rerrault ( p599 ) . After her sister tells her that clinker undersides like her would non belong at

a ball, she offers to make their hair in readying for the large dark. Teaching childs to conceal their

emotions is one of the negative traits of this narrative. This besides teaches the credence of an inferior

function in society. Most of these intimations are geared towards immature misss, who are supposed to see that

they shouldn & # 8217 ; Ts have any aspirations, but wait until their agony will pay off in a glorious manner.

This passivity takes a different bend in & # 8220 ; Ever After & # 8221 ; . From the beginning Danielle shows her

stamina and aggressive attack from crushing up her male friend when she was immature, to

throwing apples at the prince and pluging her evil sister in the face. An detonation of emotions

besides occurred when the Baroness crossed the line. Another good illustration of Danielle & # 8217 ; s

aggressiveness and make bolding personality is exposed when she goes to purchase back and rescue her

peasant friend. She was non afraid to stand up for what she believes and state her sentiment to the

Prince. She did non allow the royalty of the Prince intimidate her. She is non merely cistron

rous, but she is

besides non scared to take hazards.

As in most versions of Cinderella, she is beautiful, and characterized as the perfect tantrum for

the Prince. This indicates that misss should merely be pretty objects for work forces to look at. Girls are

supposed to populate up to the outlooks of beauty and flawlessness, which could impede 1s self

esteem profoundly if one feels they are non what they are supposed to be. In the film & # 8220 ; Ever After & # 8221 ;

things have changed. Danielle is non merely beautiful, and she is non unflawed. Danielle is

developed into a strong, mature and smart adult female. She is non merely a beautiful face but a whole batch

more. She teaches the Prince about literature and moral values. She shows him how to handle other

people and non be judgmental like he was toward the Gypsies. The Prince is really much act upon

by Cinderella & # 8217 ; s personality which helps him be a better individual. Although she is a really good function

theoretical account, she is non perfect and makes errors which reduces the image of flawlessness. She strives

to be a good individual and makes other people better.

Apart from the interior beauty and strength, she is besides strong physically. & # 8220 ; This is one tough,

Cinderella & # 8221 ; Drew Barrymore ( p634 ) . She performs day-to-day undertakings that would be considered adult male & # 8217 ; s

work. She takes attention of the hogs and even dramas function reversal when she rescues the Prince from the

itinerants by caring hectometer on her dorsum This brings up another good comparing of how these two

versions of the same narrative are different.

A definite trait of many versions of Cinderella is the wages for enduring. The Prince

charming and the charming find of his perfect mate. Unlike Perrault & # 8217 ; s version, the film does

non hold any charming events. & # 8220 ; Our version of Cinderella & # 8217 ; s magic comes from within, non from

some small old lady with a wand & # 8221 ; Andy Tennant ( p633 ) . Cinderella earns everything she gets

through working hard. She does non wait to be rescued, but alternatively makes things go on for

herself. She shows that adult females don & # 8217 ; t need work forces or thaumaturgy to derive an individuality or be successful.

Although the Prince is at that place in the terminal, he does non deliver her from the adult male who bought her. She

shows her strength one time once more by acquiring off on her ain. Danielle does non allow things stand in

her way. & # 8221 ; The fairy narrative Cinderella gets shut down by those around her, but Danielle refuses to acquire

shut down. & # 8221 ; Drew Barrymore ( p634 ) .

Not merely Cinderella & # 8217 ; s function has changed. Other characters symbolize a alteration in gender

categorization every bit good. In the film, there are male retainers, non merely adult females. Besides, there is a really

of import portion played by one of Danielles & # 8217 ; s measure sisters. She makes it clear to the male monarch that the

Baroness has lied to the queen, which in bend helped Cinderella and made the Baroness and her

evil sister into retainers. Work forces are non the lone 1s who helped Danielle.

I think that we would all hold that even when things change, some things ever stay the

same. It is safe to state that Cinderella will ever be a female, and this should non be looked upon

as gender prejudiced thing. There are although some features of the authoritative Cinderella

that can be seen as discriminatory to adult females such as the labels of lower status, dependance, and

passivity. By analyzing a recent version of the narrative we can see a important alteration in

equalising the differences between genders. Since faery narratives have been known to reflect on its

society we can analyze the alterations that occurred between two versions of the same narrative and see

the progresss that have been made in society. We see Danielle as a much stronger, independent

and more influential than the authoritative Cinderella. This implies that society is traveling in a positive

way to level the playing field between work forces and adult females. Richard Convingtons essay decidedly

complements the points in this. This film is a definite transmutation of the authoritative narrative. The

manager of the film made a witting attempt to alter this fairy narrative to suit our society and he

succeeded. As before there have been many different versions of this narrative, and new 1s are still

being made. These new versions such as & # 8220 ; Ever After & # 8221 ; will be modeled after a different set of

values and thoughts to mirror present twenty-four hours society.

331