The moral argument about abortion has focused on either the rights of the foetus or the rights of the female parent. If the foetus has rights so abortion is immoral and non allowable. If the foetus does non hold rights. so abortion is morally acceptable and allowable. If both the female parent and the foetus have rights. so either the rights of the foetus have precedence. or those of the female parent have precedence. If that didn’t complicate affairs plenty. we have those who argue that some foetuss have moral rights while others do non. doing abortion sometimes morally allowable and sometimes morally impermissible.
The intent of this essay ; to reason that abortion is either ever morally allowable or it is ever morally impermissible. it can non be both at the same clip. There are two chief statements refering the morality of abortion. One relates to the moral position of the foetus – whatever that may be. and the other relates to the woman’s right to take what happens to her organic structure. The moral position of the foetus seems to find whether or non it has a right to life.
On the other manus. the woman’s right to take rises concerns about whether or non abortion is ever justified. Some statements environing the abortion argument focal point on the permissibility or impermissibility of abortion based on how the foetus was conceived – chiefly colza. Pregnancies as the consequence of colza seem The chief focal point should be adult females who are unwillingly pregnant. because by and large talking they are the 1s seeking abortions.
There are rare exclusions. such as a adult female who is volitionally pregnant. but aborts the gestation because it is seting her ain life at hazard. but that is an wholly different statement and will non be discussed here. Alternatively. we will concentrate on unwanted gestations that are non jeopardizing the life of the adult female and how the moral permissibility of aborting these unwanted gestations should non rest on how the foetus was conceived.
