Athenian Democracy Vs Canadian Essay, Research Paper

Athenian Democracy Vs. Canadian Democracy

The system of democracy practised by antediluvian Athens was a much better system of democracy than that of Canada. The Athenian system was more just, a great trade more democratic, and straight affected 1s life. The Canadian system of democracy falls short of equity is a great trade less democratic, and it is difficult to pick out the particular inside informations that straight affect 1s life.

What must foremost be explained is that in Athens, merely citizens could vote and keep places. Citizens were males, over the age of 18 who were born of Athenian parents. This may hold badly narrowed down the engagement of all occupants of Athens, but they ran their metropolis on a different set of values, in a clip long ago, which justifies the exclusion of adult females, slaves and whomever else was non a citizen.

Of those who were considered citizens, everyone could take part. If one didn & # 8217 ; Ts have a house, there was no favoritism. There was besides no favoritism based on fiscal state of affairs, or societal standing. Peoples who held places were non voted on by other citizens, but instead drawn by batch. This ensured that everyone would keep a place at least one time.

In Canada, if one wants to run for a place, one must foremost hold a big beginning of money, every bit good as a high societal standing, to guarantee fiscal backup, in instance more support is needed. After support is secured, there is the affair of an ad run, and act uponing the populace to vote for you. The chief job lies in voting. One can merely vote if there is a lasting abode to reach the elector at. Immigrants who have non gained citizenship, no affair how long they have be

nut life in the state, can non vote. While Canada does hold a reasonably high per centum of the population vote ( 80 % ) , this still does non include everyone. Another major job is with how the individual running is voted in. Equally long as that individual receives the most ballots compared to each of the other campaigners, they are considered the victor. However, even when all of the resistance ballots tabulated together equal more than the entire ballots of the winning campaigner, they still win. This is a defect that the Athenian democratic system ne’er had, due to their places of power being drawn indiscriminately.

In Athens, when a measure was voted on, it straight affected those who voted for it. Such as, if the predicament of war was brought up, and it was voted that Athens would travel to war, the people voting knew they would hold to travel to war themselves.

In Canada, if a measure is voted on, the people who have the concluding determination are the elective functionaries, who are supposed to stand for the general populace. While the populace does non acquire to vote on measures and propositions, they are allowed to talk at public meetings to voice their sentiments, though by and large they go unreciprocated.

The people of Athens considered democracy a particular thing, and felt it their responsibility to take portion, which they did on a regular footing.

Today, we have grown used to democracy, and see it as something that will ne’er travel away, about taken for granted. Ailments about authorities are heard everyplace, yet no 1 makes an attempt to alter the system so it becomes more just. Most are content complaining, as it gives them something to speak about.

Therefore, it has been proved that the Athenian manner of democracy was much more complete and just than our ain manner of authorities.