War Ii Essay, Research Paper

The Atomic Bomb and its Effectss on Post-World War II American LiteratureRob GioielliMrs.

McFarlanSenior English6 Dec. 1994Gioielli 1Rob GioielliMrs. McFarlanSenior English 6 Dec.

1994Then a enormous flash of light cut across the sky. Mr. Tanimoto has a distinguishable

remembrance that it traveled from E to west, from the metropolis toward the hills. It seemed

like a sheet of Sun. ? John Hersey, from Hiroshima, pp.8 On August 6, 1945, the universe

changed everlastingly. On that twenty-four hours the United States of America detonated an atomic bomb over the

metropolis of Hiroshima. Never before had world seen anything like. Here was something that

was somewhat bigger than an ordinary bomb, yet could do boundlessly more devastation. It

could rend through walls and rupture down houses like the Satans bust uping ball. In Hiroshima it

killed 100,000 people, most non-military civilians. Three yearss subsequently in Nagasaki it killed

approximately 40,000. The immediate effects of these bombardments were simple. The Nipponese

authorities surrendered, unconditionally, to the United States. The remainder of the universe

rejoiced as the most destructive war in the history of world came to an terminal. All while

the subsisters of Hiroshima and Nagasaki tried to patch together what was left of their

lives, households and places. Over the class of the following 40 old ages, these two bombardments,

and the atomic weaponries race that followed them, would come to hold a direct or indirect

consequence on about every adult male, adult female and kid on this Earth, including people in the United

States. The atomic bomb would perforate every cloth of American being. From our

political relations to our educational system. Our industry and our art. Historians have gone so

far as to name this period in our history the? atomic age? for the manner it has shaped and

guided universe political relations, dealingss and civilization. The full history behind the bomb itself is

rooted in Twentieth Century natural philosophies. At the clip of the bombing the scientific discipline of natural philosophies had

been undergoing a revolution for the past thirty-odd old ages. Scientists now had a clear

image of what the atomic universe was like. They new the construction and atom make-up of

atoms, every bit good as how they behaved. During the 1930? s it became evident that there was a

huge sum of energy that would be released atoms of Gioielli 2certain elements were

split, or taken apart. Scientists began to recognize that if harnessed, this energy could be

something of a magnitude non earlier seen to human eyes. They besides saw that this energy

could perchance be harnessed into a arm of astonishing power. And with the coming of World

War Two, this became an of all time increasing concern. In the early autumn of 1939, the same clip

that the Germans invaded Poland, President Roosevelt received a missive from Albert Einstein,

informing him about the certain possibilities of making a controlled atomic concatenation

reaction, and that tackling such a reaction could bring forth a bomb of formidable strength.

He wrote: This new phenomena would take besides lead to the building of bombs, and it is

imaginable, though much less certain-that highly powerful bombs of a new type may therefore

be constructed ( Clark 556-557 ) .The missive goes on to promote the president to increase

authorities and military engagement in such experiments, and to promote the experimental

work of the scientists with the allotment of financess, installations and equipment that might be

necessary. This missive finally led to the Manhattan Project, the attempt that involved

one million millions of dollars and 10s of 1000s of people to bring forth the atomic bomb. During the

clip after the war, until merely late the American mind has been branded with the menace

of a atomic holocaust. Here was something so powerful, yet so bantam. A bomb that

could kill our states capital, and that was every bit large as persons backyard grill. For

the first clip in the history of human being here was something capable of pass overing us off

the face of the Earth. And most people had no control over that fate. It seemed like

peoples lives, the life of everything on this planet, was resting in the custodies of a twosome

work forces in Northern Virginia and some cats over in Russia. The atomic bomb and the amazing

power it held over us had a enormous influence on American Culture, including a profound

consequence on American Literature. After the war, the first existent piece of literature about the

bombardments came in 1946. The work Hiroshima, by Jon Hersey, from which the gap quotation mark is

taken, foremost appeared as a long article in the New Yorker, so shortly after in book signifier.

The book is a non-fiction history of the bombardment of Hiroshima and the immediate wake.

It is told from the point-of-view of six hibakusha, or? subsisters? of the atomic blast. In

four chapters Hersey traces how the these people survived the blast, and what they did in

following hebdomads and months to draw their lives together Gioielli 3and save their households.

The book takes on a tone of understanding and of marvelous endurance? that these people were

lucky plenty to last the blast. He focuses non on the agony of the victims but on

their bravery ( Stone, 7 ) . The undermentioned transition from the first chapter shows this: A 100

thousand people were killed by the bomb, and these six were among the subsisters. They still

admiration why they lived when so many others died. Tocopherol

ach of the counts many little points of

opportunity or will? a measure taken in clip, a determination to travel indoors, catching one tram

alternatively of the following? that spared him. And each that in the act of endurance he lived a twelve

lives and saw more decease than he of all time thought he would see. At the clip, none of them knew

anything ( 4 ) . Hersey was trying to chronicle what had happened at Hiroshima, and to

make so reasonably. And in stressing the survival alternatively of the agony he does non do his

book anti-American or something that condemns the dropping of the bomb. He merely gives

these peoples histories of how they survived in a tone that is more journalistic than

scandalmongering. The book empathizes with their predicament while it besides gives an American

account for the bombardment ( Stone, 7 ) . That it was an act of war to stop the war as rapidly

and every bit easy as possible, and to salvage more lives in the long tally. Hersey did all this to

supply what he considered an evenhanded portraiture of the event, but he besides did non desire to

cause much contention. Although it could be criticized for non giving a more elaborate

history of the agony that occurred, and that it reads more like a history book than a

piece of literature, Hersey? s book was the first of its sort when it was published. Up

until so all histories of the Hiroshima bombardment Hagiographas about it took the angle that

Nipponese had? deserved what we had given them? , and that we were good people for making so.

These histories were highly damaging and racialist. ( Stone, 4 ) Hersey was the first to

take the point of position of those who had really experienced the event. And his work was

the passage between plants that glorified the dropping of the atomic bomb, to those that

focused on its astonishing destructive powers, and what they could make to our universe. During the

period instantly after the war, non much information was available to general populace

refering what sort of devastation the atomic bombs had really caused in Japan. But

get downing with Hersey? s book and go oning with other non-fiction plants, such as David

Bradley & # 8217 ; s No Topographic point To Hide, which concerned the Bikini Island atomic trials, Americans

truly began to acquire a image of the amazing power and destructiveness of atomic arms.

They saw that these truly Gioielli 4were Judgment Day devices. Weapons that could alter

everything in an blink of an eye, and turn things into nil in a minute. It was this realisation

that had a startling consequence on American civilization and literature. Some Americans began to state

? At any clip we could wholly be shadows in the blast moving ridge, so what? s the point? ? . This

point of view manifested itself in literature in something called the? revelatory pique? ; an

attitude or a tone covering with a extroverted terminal to the universe. Besides, many people,

because of this realisation of our impending decease, were get downing to state that possibly their

was something inherently incorrect with all of this. That atomic arms are unsafe to

everyone, no affair what your political positions or where you live, and that we should make away

with all of them. They have no value to society and should be destroyed. This revelatory

pique and societal activism was effected greatly in the early Sixtiess by the Cuban Missile

Crisis. When Americans saw, on telecasting, that they could be under atomic onslaught in under

20 proceedingss, a new anxiousness about the cold war surfaced that had non been present since

the yearss of McCarthy. And this new anxiousness was evidenced in plants that took on a much more

satirical tone. And one of the plants that shows this satiric revelatory pique and

cynicism is Kurt Vonnegut & # 8217 ; s Cats Cradle. Vonnegut, considered by many to be one of United states

foremost life writers, was himself a veteran of World War Two. He, as a captive of war,

was one of the few subsisters of the fire-bombing of Dresden. In Dresden he saw what many

believe was a more atrocious calamity than Hiroshima. The allied bombs destroyed the full

metropolis and killed as many people, if non more, than were killed in Hiroshima. He would

finally compose about this experience in the semi-autobiographical Slaughterhouse-Five.

This novel, like Cats Cradle, takes a really strong anti-war stance. But along with being an

Anti-war book, Cats Cradle is an first-class sarcasm of the Atomic Age. It is basically the

narrative of one adult male, an writer by the name of John ( or Jonah ) and the research he is making for

a book on the twenty-four hours the bomb exploded in Hiroshima. This involves him with members of the Dr.

Felix Hoenikker household? the mastermind who helped construct the bomb? and their escapades. In the

book Vonnegut paints an fanciful universe where things might non look to do any Gioielli

5sense. But there is in fact an astonishing sum of symbolism, every bit good as sarcasm. Dr.

Hoenikker is an highly bizarre scientist who spends most of his clip in the lab at his

company. He is interested in really few things, his kids non among them. His kids

are about afraid of him. One of the few times he does seek to play with his kids is

when he tries to learn the game of cats cradle to his youngest boy, Newt. When he is seeking

to demo newt the game Newt gets really baffled. In the book, this is what Newt remembered of

the incident: ? And so he sang, ? Rockabye catsy, in the tree top? ; he sang, ? when the air current

blows, the cray-dull will fall.

367