Atomic Bomb: Was It Necessary Essay, Research Paper

Atomic Bomb

Were the atomic bombardments in Hiroshima and Nagasaki necessary to salvage allied lives and to stop Japan? s menace to universe peace? Did the resulting loss of life cost more than a deathly invasion of the Nipponese mainland? In August 1945, the first dropping of atomic bombs in civilian countries of Japan killed 100s of 1000s of guiltless people. Immediately following those bombardments, Japan surrendered to the United States. The undermentioned essay summarizes the defence of the atomic bomb and its usage, the statements against the usage of atomic arms, and includes my personal sentiment on the topic.

As the war with Germany grew closer to the terminal, the United States had their custodies full with an progressively effectual war with Japan. The licking of Japan became more evident to many allied and Nipponese leaders after the autumn of the Mariana Islands and Saipan in July of 1944. The Mariana Islands had been a cardinal defence point for Japan, but after they were captured, Japan was in scope of bombing. From November 1944 to the dropping of the atomic bomb, Japan was subjected to legion B-29 bomb foraies utilizing conventional bombs. General Curtis LeMay predicted the war to stop in September or October of 1945 because the United States would hold run out of industrial marks to destruct. While Japan was being badly bombed, there was besides a naval encirclement to halt Japan? s ability to import such necessities as oil and critical stuffs. This would hold interfered with Japans? ability to do war points and fix indispensable services. Admiral William Leahy wrote to President Truman, ? By the beginning of September, 1944, Japan will about be wholly defeated through a practically complete sea and air blockade. ? Besides, in May of 1945 the resignation of Germany freed the Alliess to concentrate their military personnels and resources to get the better of Japan.

In July 1945 a message from the Alliess known as the? Potsdam Proclamation? was broadcast in Japan. The announcement demanded? the unconditioned resignation of all the Japanese armed forces. ? There was no reference of the of the Emperor? s place, which was important because the Nipponese believed their Emperor to be a God and the bosom of Nipponese civilization. Because there was no confidence of the Emperor? s fate the Nipponese objected to the? Potsdam Proclamation. ?

The positive statement for the usage of the atomic bomb was? a rapid terminal to the Second World War, and possibly to much else besides. ? This is a quotation mark from the British Prime Minister Winston Churchill. ? The atomic bomb could work out all of our jobs in an blink of an eye, ignoring the demand for a mass invasion of coastal Japan. ? In his head, the stoping of the World War was more of import than losing a few thousand Nipponese lives as opposed to American or British lives. As Churchill says, ? The terminal of the Japanese war depended upon the pouring in of their ground forcess for the five

Al and possibly drawn-out slaughter. We need to inquire no favours of the them. ? President Truman is besides quoted as stating: ? Having found the bomb, we have used it. We have used it against those who attacked us without warning at Pearl Harbor, against those who have starved and beaten and executed American captives of war, against those who have abandoned all pretence of obeying international Torahs of warfare. ? However, the bulk of the people killed and injured by the atomic blasts at Hiroshima and Nagasaki did non fall into these classs. They were non politicians or soldiers. They were private citizens, adult females and kids.

Was the dropping of the atomic bomb necessary to stop the World War? Might the war have ended as shortly, with less deceases on both sides, and before the Soviets had entered into northern Korea? Did the atomic bomb of Hiroshima scare the Soviets into seting their atomic bomb plan into action? Did those events so lead straight to the ulterior Korean War? Was an atomic case in point set, which would be difficult to alter in the hereafter? The cognition that the Soviets were approximately to declare war on Japan would hold crushed any hope the Nipponese had of negociating peace footings through the Soviets. The nearing two war foreparts would hold disabused Japan? s military forces. Japan? s program to patch together staying forces against the predicted U.S. invasion was threatened. While it can non be proven, officially Alliess of the U.S. had made sanctioned communicating between Konoye, stating that Japan? s clip had wholly run out due to the nearing menaces of atomic devastation and Soviet invasion. These Alliess believed that immediate resignation might intend the chance for the Emperor to retain his throne. There was a opportunity the Nipponese people would hold enlisted the Emperor to convey Japan to give up by late July or early August of 1945. For these grounds many statements have been made that the usage of the atomic bomb were unneeded.

There is no manner we can cognize for certain whether another attack would hold ended the Pacific war Oklahoman and with fewer deceases. But we may repent that such an effort was non made. Had the effort failed, the go oning encirclement of supplies, the Soviet invasion, and the atomic bombs were still available schemes. The lesson to be learned may be that an utmost usage of force should merely be the last pick to stop struggle. Since the terminal of World War II, authoritiess have in fact used combinations of all other types of persuasion, but have avoided utilizing atomic bombs.

Bibliography

Hiroshima John Hersey

? Documents A through H? Educational Testing Service. Princeton, NJ 1988

? Thank God for the Atom Bomb? Paul Fussell.

? Hiroshima: Scheme for Victory? Herbert Feis. Princeton University Press, NJ 1966

? Hiroshima: The Decision? Herbert Feis. Princeton University Press, NJ 1966

341