Beowulf Essay, Research Paper
In Beowulf, the three great battles are an interesting representative of adult male & # 8217 ; s trust in God. We can see Beowulf & # 8217 ; s ability to win diminution with his demand for arms, armour, and the aid of friends
In Beowulf & # 8217 ; s first conflict, we see the true Christian spirit. While it is true that Beowulf is continuing the image of the hero, he is making it for a really baronial cause in this battle. Grendel, who Beowulf battles in this conflict, is said to be from the race of Cain and so is in a feud with God. The monster would detest anyone that God smiles on.
The fact that Grendel moves merely at dark besides makes us see the evil side of him. He hates the visible radiation from the hall. He seems to be covetous of the love and heat that it signifies. He attacks without any existent aggravation.
When Hrothgar finds out that Beowulf has come to assist him in his battle against Grendel, he says & # 8220 ; Holy God of His Grace has sent him to us West-Danes, as I hope, against the panic of Grendel. & # 8221 ; This sets the thought of good against immorality. Beowulf will stand for God and Grendel represents the Satan. Beowulf strengthens this position with his determination to contend Grendel with out any arms. He is willing to allow the Lord decide who will win this conflict & # 8211 ; & # 8220 ; The one whom decease takes can swear the Lord & # 8217 ; s judgement. & # 8221 ;
Beowulf is demoing a batch of religion in this action. While his strength is frequently talked about, so is Grendel & # 8217 ; s. We are told of Grendel & # 8217 ; s war-strength. Beowulf would hold known these narratives and still take to swear in God & # 8217 ; s religious aid alternatively of adult male & # 8217 ; s physical aid.
When we turn to the 2nd conflict, things are a small different. For one thing, Grendel & # 8217 ; s female parent is non merely moving out of hate. She is seeking justness for her boy & # 8217 ; s decease. She merely kills one adult male & # 8211 ; similar to the thought of a blood feud that Beowulf and his coevalss would understand.
When Beowulf decides to travel after Grendel & # 8217 ; s female parent, he is offered the usage of Hrothgar & # 8217 ; s blade, Hrunting. He accepts the offer. Grendel & # 8217 ; s female parent & # 8217 ; s strength is ne’er emphasized as Grendel & # 8217 ; s was, but Beowulf decides he needs a arm against her. This seems unusual unless you realize he has non talked about the backup of God in this battle. It is like he realizes this is a human determination, non a defence against an enemy of God. He, excessively, is seeking retaliation.
It is interesting to observe that the human arm he takes with him into conflict is of no usage. He ends up killing Grendel & # 8217 ; s female parent with a supernatural blade made by giants. It is about a mark that arms of the physical universe are worthless in these battles.
The 3rd conflict is really different Fr
om the first two. This clip Beowulf is supporting his ain Kingdom against the fury of a firedrake. But the firedrake is like Grendel’s female parent in that he is non motiveless. Some of the hoarded wealth he hoards has been stolen from under his olfactory organ. He is ferocious and looking for retribution. As a consequence,
Beowulf feels he has to kill the firedrake to maintain his people safe. Once once more a slightly baronial cause, but more for the & # 8220 ; hero & # 8221 ; grounds than the & # 8220 ; Christian & # 8221 ; grounds.
When Beowulf goes into this conflict, he is armed to the full and has the aid of a friend. Even with all these physical aids, he does non do good. While he does kill the firedrake, the firedrake besides kills him.
It is really interesting to observe the differences and similarities in these three battles. All of Beowulf & # 8217 ; s struggles are with animals of the dark. But Grendel is the lone 1 that appears to be a true enemy of God. In the conflict with Grendel, Beowulf does look to be a retainer of God. He is halting a true immorality, a descendent of the race of Cain. He knows he can swear in the power of God to assist him in this conflict.
On the other manus, Grendel & # 8217 ; s female parent and the firedrake have valid grounds for their onslaughts. Beowulf changes his scheme to depend on things of this universe. While he is successful in both instances, neither is as cut and dried as the conflict with Grendel. The earthly blades he uses in both conflicts are useless. In the conflict with Grendel & # 8217 ; s female parent, he is fortunate to hold entree to a supernatural blade. In the conflict with the firedrake, he has the aid of a friend and ends up killing the firedrake with his knife.
Besides interesting to observe is the add-on of hoarded wealth to each conflict. In contending Grendel, Beowulf expects nil but the celebrity due a hero. In the conflict with Grendel & # 8217 ; s female parent, there is much said about the hoarded wealth he can have. While he does non look to be influenced by this hoarded wealth, he does take much of it back to his King. In contending the firedrake, there is the obvious award of winning the hoarded wealth. While Beowulf says he wants the hoarded wealth for his people, it ends up chiefly being buried with him.
The three conflicts of Beowulf seem to hold a definite message. If you can trust on the natural gifts you have received from God and know you have God & # 8217 ; s backup, you will win any battle. But if you have to fall back to swearing in the physical gifts of our universe, the conflict may be much more dearly-won. The message seems rather clear. If you truly read this narrative and see the significance of the three conflicts, it may assist you to do the right determinations in your life. Make you take God & # 8217 ; s natural way, or do you take one brought on by human & # 8217 ; s need for retaliation and laterality?