Prenatal Genetic Testing has become one of the most outstanding and influential progresss in clinical genetic sciences today. Every twelvemonth. 100s of twosomes request testing services. hence. subjecting themselves to the consequences of the diagnosing. For some. the information may be a suspiration of alleviation. and for others a susurration of warning. The construct of Prenatal Genetic Screening has merely late surfaced for contention. In effect to the completion of the Human Genome Project ( 2003 ) . the option for Prenatal Genetic Screening can now be performed for an low-cost 1. 000 dollars. Using province of the art multiplex engineerings such as cistron french friess and micro beads. we can already track 100s of 1000s of alone SNPs or Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms to test our genome at over half a million pinpoints that are believed to be associated with peculiar traits. diseases. susceptiblenesss. and conditions.
In add-on to testing for diseases. this engineering threatens to fiddle with our perceptual experience of individualism. Raising the inquiry of constitutionality. and whether it should be permitted to end a gestation based for grounds of sex. hair colour. or oculus colour [ Designer Babies ] . If approved by the FDA. this option is predicted to motivate a dramatic addition in gestation expirations and lead to a host of practical and legal inquiries. Some believe that the construct is simple. Using possible cognition of the at hand hereafter. we are given the opportunity to believe and to fix. We are given the opportunity to absorb the entireness of the state of affairs and confer with a genetic sciences counsellor. With anterior cognition we could salvage people old ages of agony and fiscal problem.
Others question the effectivity and benefits of familial showing and inquire if the procedure would motivate undue emotional hurt. hurt for the safety of the foetus and besides the issue of privateness. And go on to observe the dark and looming intensions of Designer Babies. It is apparent that the latter statement is the common penchant. nevertheless. I will take the route less taken. Five old ages ago I lived an guiltless childhood. where everyone laughed and played. and there was no worse enduring beyond grating my articulatio genus on the paving. Two old ages subsequently that world was shattered. What I didn’t know at the clip was that there were kids who lived lives far different from mine.
Children like my babe cousin Jasmine. Jasmine was born with a rare familial upset called Pfeiffer’s Syndrome. a disease characterized by the early merger of the castanetss in her skull. She would ne’er populate my childhood world. for frankly she would ne’er populate to the age. Often times I wondered what could hold been done. and merely late has it revealed itself to me that “Prenatal Genetic Screening” was the reply to my relentless inquiry. If lone it had been available at the clip. possibly Jasmine could hold grown up to be the following “James D. Watson. ” “Francis Crick” or “Rosalind Franklin. ” Now we will ne’er cognize. Now that it is possible to salvage. to alleviate. and to bring around. is it worth the hazard to give kids like Jasmine a just opportunity at life? I believe so.
Plants Cited
“The President’s Council on Bioethicss: The Future of Newborn Screening: Clouds on the Horizon? ” The President’s Council on Bioethicss: The Future of Newborn Screening: Clouds on the Horizon? N. p. . n. d. Web. 26 Jan. 2013.
“The Genetic Testing Controversy. ” The Genetic Testing Controversy. N. p. . n. d. Web. 26 Jan. 2013.
“History and Overview of Newborn Screening. ” Welcome. N. p. . n. d. Web. 26 Jan. 2013.
“New Prenatal Genetic Test Is Much More Powerful at Detecting Fetal Abnormalities. ” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily. 09 Feb. 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2013.
“Prenatal Diagnostic Trials and the Social. Legal. and Ethical Deductions. ” Prenatal Diagnostic Trials and the Social. Legal. and Ethical Deductions. N. p. . n. d. Web. 13 Feb. 2013.
