Introduction It is frequently argued that when concern individuals of different civilizations negotiate commercial trades. there is bound to be a civilization clang. I disagree with this position. It is true that cultural differences influence concern dialogues but with the appropriate attack to cover with the differences. civilization clang is to be least expected in any concern dialogues. particularly with the Chinese. As Sun Tzu would advised in his book The Art of War “Know your enemy and cognize yourself and you will win all battles” ( Sun Tzu 1913 ) .

Harmonizing to Newstrom and Davis ( 2002 ) there are many dramatic differences across states. merely as there are some surprising similarities. Clearly. occupants of each state have their ain penchants for apparels. nutrient. diversion. and lodging. In his research about national civilizations of 60 states. Hofstede ( 1993 ) revealed that civilizations differ in five cardinal factors viz. . individualism/collectivism. power distance. uncertainness turning away. masculinity/femininity. and clip orientation.

Among these factors. the Chinese have the civilization that value lucidity and have the sort of orientation that accent values such as necessity of fixing for the hereafter. the value of thrift and nest eggs. and the virtues of continuity. Literatures on different civilizations besides classify China as high-context civilization which tends to stress personal dealingss. topographic point value on trust. concentrate on non-verbal cues. and accent the demand to go to to societal demands before concern affairs ( Newstrom and Davis 2002 ) . Culture is really of import in certain state such as China.

Huntinghon ( 2000 ) as cited by Fellner ( 2008 ) defined civilization as the values. attitudes. beliefs. and implicit in premises prevalent among people in a society. He stressed that civilization is dynamic. synergistic. and interactive. and intermixes with all the elements of the society such as concern and economic development ( Huntinghon 2000 ; Fellner 2008 ) . Huiping ( 2009 ) stated in her article entitled Understanding Chinese civilization leads to concern success with China’s turning significance as an economic world power understanding the Chinese mind becomes really helpful and utile in concern dialogues direction of provider dealingss and many other concern state of affairss.

As emphasized by Uthaisangchai ( n. d. ) . Chinese history and civilization has impact on the manner they do concern and each of the many elements of the Chinese civilization has a function to play in today Chinese concern universe. In Hofstede’s ( 1980 ) theory of individualism-collectivism as cited by Jones ( 2009 ) . the individuality and Bolshevism dimensions differs on the grade a civilization is committed to an in-group such as drawn-out household. company or small town.

In the individualistic society. people are less affiliated to an in-group ( that is. people are more egoistic and in chase of their ain opportunisms ) . Meanwhile in the leftist society. people are more affiliated to an in-group. that is the involvements of the in-group semen foremost. Jones ( 2009 ) besides noted from Hofstede and Bond ( 1988 ) that such value of Bolshevism likely stems from a deep rooted. deep-rooted civilization based on the traditional doctrine of Confucianism. Uthaisangchai ( n. d. ) gave accent of the instructions of Confucius in the development of the civilization of Chinese.

In the article entitled Connecting Confucianism. Communism and the Chinese Culture of Commerce. Keller and Kronstedt ( 2005 ) explained that Confucianism is a really of import constituent of the Chinese civilization. “In a Confucian society. everyone has a function to play. and the key relationship is built around the family… Chinese cultures value household connexions and protecting relationships ( salvaging face ) .

Developing ‘family-like’ relationships takes clip and forbearance. non simply a contractual trade based entirely on money. If one has to make concern in a Chinese civilization. it is critical to understand and esteem Confucian values” ( Keller and Kronstedt 2005 ) . Keller and Kronstedt ( 2005 ) further emphasized the significance of connections-Guanxi. In Confusian-based society like China. guanxi or proper connexions are more important than monetary value. merchandise. topographic point. etc. Harmonizing to Jones ( 2009 ) . China is known for being loyal to their in-group’ and prefering them in concern related determination.

As given accent by Li ( 2008 ) as cited by Jones ( 2009 ) . understanding the guanxi is critical for carry oning concern in China and it involves cultivating trust. credibleness and reciprocality. One manner to understand cultural differences is through the constructs of high-context civilization and low-context civilization. The impression of ‘context’ can be understood as the societal environment in which a concern dealing takes topographic point. Edward T. Hall’s theory of high- and low-context civilization explains the powerful consequence civilization has on communicating.

The states classified as high-context civilizations include China. Korea. Japan. Middle East. Africa. Italy and South America in which people are characterized as leftists. relational. brooding and intuitive. This implies that the people in these societies put accent on good relationship between members of the society. In relation to concern minutess. the development of trust is a really of import measure. Hall ( 1976 ) argued that the people in high-context civilizations prefer harmoniousness in group and understanding for the accomplishment of single members ; besides persons make determinations based on their feelings or intuition.

The theory farther emphasized that persons focus on non-verbal cues. that is. words are non so important in communicating as compared to context ; instead. more is given accent on context which include facial look. tone of voice of the talker. position. gestures. and household history and position of the person. The communicating in the high-context civilization is depicted as formal and indirect. which suggests that flowery humbleness. flowery linguistic communication. and apologies that are frequently excessively elaborated are common. Besides. communicators in this type of civilization do non depend on linguistic communication preciseness and legal paperss.

Meanwhile. the states classified as holding low-context civilization include Germany. North America. Finland. Canada. Norway. Denmark. and Sweden are additive. logical. action-oriented. and individualistic. Persons in the low-context states value facts. logic and they prefer straightness. Finding solutions to jobs involves placing and reciting all the facts and measuring each of the options. Besides. each determination is based on facts ; more frequently each treatment ends with an action. Communicators in this type of civilization are anticipated to be concise. straightforward. and efficient in conveying the action that is expected.

Harmonizing to Hall ( 1976 ) . communicators have to be precise in the words used in pass oning to be perfectly understood. All dialogues are ever concluded with definite contracts. Summarizing up the differences. on the one manus. high-context civilizations tend to stress personal dealingss. topographic point high value on trust. focal point on gestural cues. and accent the demand to go to to societal demands before concern affairs. On the other manus. low-context civilizations tend to construe cues more literally. Persons tend to trust on written regulations and legal paperss. behavior concern foremost. and value expertness and public presentation.

With these categorizations of civilizations. it is evident that when Americans negotiate with Chinese. a failure in dialogue if non a civilization is more likely if the former group is non familiar with the latter. As noted by Minor and Lamberton ( 2010 ) from an interview with intercultural communicating expert beam Ruiz: “Countries in Latin American and Asia value the edifice of relationships. but each in their ain alone manner. Before going to another state. I would urge reading appropriate stuffs and talking with foreign subjects shacking in the U.

S. in respects to the imposts and concern patterns in their state of beginning. I would besides propose that. one time in a foreign state. it is of import to detect your host’s idiosyncrasies and responses and respectfully react in a similar mode. Be good versed on acceptable and unacceptable behaviours. For illustration. when in Asia. make compliment and portion your feelings of their state. Do non worsen any nutrient or drink because this is viewed as an abuse. In Latin America. make get down all meetings with friendly conversation sing household or other societal subjects.

Do non get down a meeting diging straight into the concern aim. The lesson many American concern people fail to larn is that “it is all in the relationships” ( Minor & A ; Lamberton 2010 ) . In his article Making Business In and With China: The hazards are great. but so are the wagess. Atkinson ( 2004 ) noted from Stephen Nelson. the spouse and co-head of the China pattern group for the Hong Kong-based jurisprudence house Baker & A ; McKenzie. that when geting concerns in China. it is of import to recognize that there are sensed cultural differences.

One of the of import lessons in doing concern in China is that aliens merely can non come in a venture in China with merely a cursory apprehension of its footings and conditions. Atkinson ( 2004 ) cited an illustration of a US company that late decided to do an investing in China by puting up a joint company through its Hong Kong fabrication agent. The US company sent over $ 3 million worth of equipment. so came to us with certification written in Chinese and asked ‘Can you look at this and state us whether we truly ain 50 per centum of this company? ’

Akgunes et Al ( 2012 ) identified several points to see for successful dialogues. Harmonizing to Zhao ( 2000 ) as cited by Akgunes et Al ( 2012 ) . dialogues become successful when the participating parties are concerted with one another ; this can be done by using the concerted Confucian tactics. Besides. for a western company like a US company. such company has to demo that they have authorities support which is an indicant that they are dependable. stable and believable to make concern with.

Harmonizing to Fang ( 2006 ) as noted by Akgunes ( 2012 ) . trust will take to much better public presentation and being patient will be more good to you than any other property you might possess. Bredin ( 1998 ) as cited by Akgunes ( 2012 ) besides suggested that a foreign concern negotiant should non give in to coerce from higher-ups to travel rapidly up and finish the trade because can do jobs because the Chinese are non greatly concerned with the clip dimension. There are companies that besides failed to successfully negociate concern trades with the Chinese.

Harmonizing to Fang ( 2006 ) as cited by Akgunes ( 2012 ) . the most common ground for failure is that the Chinese house lacks the financess to travel through with a trade. Besides. directing a low-ranking employee to do the dialogue will be viewed as really impolite and the Chinese may happen it contemptuous and insincere. in this instance failure is besides about certain. Furthermore. it is of import to observe from Sebenius ( 2002 ) as cited by Akgunes ( 2012 ) that Chinese jurisprudence says that one can non go forth a contract unless both sides approve disintegration.

Fang ( 2006 ) as cited by Akgunes et Al ( 2012 ) besides emphasized that Failure to state no to a Chinese negotiant who is utilizing a Sun Tzu-like scheme could be damaging to the trade. but on the other manus. stating “no” to a Confucian gentleman could do a loss of face. This besides will be really harmful. if non fatal. to a successful trade. The Chinese have regional countries merely like the United States and there are really different civilizations. traditions and sometimes linguistic communications in these parts.

Not admiting these parts can do you to hold limited success in one country and a complete failure in another ( Fang 2006 ; Akgunes 2012 ) . Decision In decision. like what Sun Tzu have said in his book The Art of War “Know your enemy and cognize yourself and you will win all battles” ( Sun Tzu 1913 ) . This means that for companies to be successful in doing concern trades. holding the capital is non plenty to shut a concern trade. Knowledge and apprehension of the civilization of the chance concern spouse is really of import.

Other than this. Sebenius ( 2002 ) emphasized that culturl commitments are frequently non every bit simple as they appear. Planing the right scheme and tactics in making the right people. with the right statements. will ensue to a sustainable trade. References Fellner. Amira 2008. ‘Role of Culture in Economic Development: Case Study of China and Latin America’ . Graduate School Theses. University of South Florisa Schoalr Commons. viewed from hypertext transfer protocol: //scholarcommons. usf. edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi? article=1235 & A ; context=etd Hall. Edward 1976. Beyond Culture.

Hofstede. Geert 1993. ‘Cultural Constraints in Management Theories’ . Academy of Management Executive. pp. 81-94. Jones. Gwen 2009. ‘Differences in the Perceptions of Unethical Workplace Behaviors among Chinese and American Business Professionals. Competition Forum. vol. 7. no. 2. pp. 473-480. Keller. G. & A ; Kronstedt C. 2005. ‘Connecting Confucianism. Communicsm. and the Chinese Culture of Commerce’ . Journal of Language for International Business. vol. 26. no. 1. pp. 60-75. Minor. Leslie & A ; Lamberton. Lowell 2010. ‘High-Context & amp ; Low-Context Cultures’ . viewed from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. cascadebusnews. com/business-tips/networking/154-high-context-a-low-context-cultures. Newstrom. JW. & A ; Davis. K. 2002. Organizational Behavior:

Human Behavior at Work. McGraw-Hill Sun Tzu 1913. The Art of War. Uthaisangchai. Prasong ( n. d. ) . ‘The Importance of Understanding Chinese Culture’ . viewed form hypertext transfer protocol: //www. bangkokbank. com/download/Week % 2012 % 20Culture % 20intro. pdf Huiping. Iler 2009. ‘Understanding Chinese Culture Leads to Business Success. Canadian HR Report. vol. 22. no. 12. pp. 18.