Clear Vision In King Lear- Essay, Research Paper

Clear Vision in King Lear-

In Shakespeare & # 8217 ; s authoritative calamity, King Lear, the issue of

sight and its relevancy to clear vision is a repeating subject.

Shakespeare & # 8217 ; s chief agencies of portraying this subject is through the

characters of Lear and Gloucester. Although Lear can physically see,

he is blind in the sense that he lacks penetration, apprehension, and

way. In contrast, Gloucester becomes physically unsighted but additions

the type of vision that Lear deficiencies. It is apparent from these two

characters that clear vision is non derived entirely from physical

sight. Lear & # 8217 ; s failure to understand this is the chief cause of his

death, while Gloucester learns to accomplish clear vision, and

accordingly avoids a destiny similar to Lear & # 8217 ; s.

Throughout most of King Lear, Lear & # 8217 ; s vision is clouded by his

deficiency of penetration. Since he can non see into other people & # 8217 ; s characters,

he can ne’er place them for who they genuinely are. When Lear is

angered by Cordelia, Kent tries to ground with Lear, who is excessively

stubborn to stay open-minded. Lear responds to Kent & # 8217 ; s resistance

with, & # 8220 ; Out of my sight! , & # 8221 ; to which Kent responds, & # 8220 ; See better, Lear,

and allow me still remain & # 8221 ; ( I.i.160 ) . Here, Lear is stating he ne’er

wants to see Kent once more, but he could ne’er truly see him for who he

was. Kent was merely seeking to make what was best for Lear, but Lear could

non see that. Kent & # 8217 ; s vision is non clouded, as is Lear & # 8217 ; s, and he knows

that he can stay close Lear every bit long as he is in camouflage. Later,

Lear & # 8217 ; s vision is so superficial that he is easy duped by the

physical garments and simple camouflage that Kent wears. Lear can non see

who Kent truly. He merely learns of Kent & # 8217 ; s baronial and honest character

merely prior to his decease, when his vision is cleared. By this clip,

nevertheless, it is excessively late for an honest relationship to be salvaged.

Lear & # 8217 ; s vision is besides marred by his deficiency of way in life,

and his hapless foresight, his inability to foretell the effects of

his actions. He can non look far plenty into the hereafter to see the

effects of his actions. This, in add-on to his deficiency of penetration

into other people, reprobate his relationship with his most darling

girl, Cordelia. When Lear asks his girls who loves him most,

he already thinks that Cordelia has the most love for him. However,

when Cordelia says, & # 8220 ; I love your Majesty/According to my bond, no more

nor less & # 8221 ; ( I.i.94-95 ) , Lear can non see what these words truly intend.

Goneril and Regan are merely seting on an act. They do non genuinely love

Lear every bit much as they should. When Cordelia says these words, she has

seen her sisters & # 8217 ; facade, and she does non desire to tie in her true

love with their false love. Lear, nevertheless, is fooled by Goneril and

Regan into believing that they love him, while Cordelia does non. Kent,

who has sufficient penetration, is able to see through the duologue and

knows that Cordelia is the lone girl who really loves Lear. He

attempts to convert Lear of this, stating, & # 8220 ; Answer my life my

judgement, /Thy youngest girl does non love thee least & # 8221 ;

( I.i.153-154 ) . Lear, nevertheless, lacks the penetration that Kent has. He merely

sees what is on the surface, and can non understand the deeper

purposes of the girls & # 8217 ; addresss. As his choler grows from the

statement, his foresight diminishes as he becomes progressively rash and

narrow minded. When Lear disowns Cordelia, he says, & # 8220 ; we/Have no such

girl, nor shall of all time see/That face of hers once more & # 8221 ; ( I.i.264-266 ) .

He can non see far plenty into the hereafter to understand the

effects of this action. Ironically, he subsequently discovers that

Cordelia is the lone girl he wants to see, inquiring her to & # 8220 ; bury

and forgive & # 8221 ; ( IV.vii.85 ) . By this clip, he has eventually started to derive

some way, and his vision is cleared, but it is excessively late for his

life to be saved. His deficiency of foreknowledge had condemned him from the

beginning.

Lear depicts Shakespeare & # 8217 ; s subject of clear vision by

showing that physical sight does non vouch clear sight.

Gloucester depicts this subject by showing clear vision, despite

the entire deficiency of physical sight. Prior to the loss of his eyes,

Gloucester & # 8217 ; s vision was much like Lear & # 8217 ; s. He could non see what was

genuinely traveling on around him. Alternatively, he merely saw what was presented to

him on the surface. When Edmund shows him the missive that is

purportedly from Edgar, it takes really small convincing for Gloucester

to believe it. Equally shortly as Edmund references that Edgar could be plotting

against him, Gloucester calls him an & # 8220 ; Abhorred scoundrel, unnatural,

detested, beastly scoundrel & # 8221 ; ( I.ii.81-82 ) . He does non even halt to

see whether Edgar would make such a thing because he can non see

into Edgar & # 8217 ; s character. At this point, Gloucester & # 8217 ; s life is headed

down a way of damnation similar to Lear & # 8217 ; s because of a similar deficiency

of sight.

When Gloucester loses his physical sight, his vision really

clears, in that he can see what is traveling on around him. When

Gloucester is captured by Cornwall, Gloucester provokes him to tweak

out his eyes:

But I shall see

The wing vitamin D retribution overtake such kids.

Cornwall. See & # 8217 ; t shalt thou ne’er. Fellows, hold the chair.

Upon these eyes of thine I & # 8217 ; ll put my pes. ( III.vii.66-69 )

When Gloucester is stating this, he still lacks clear vision, and would

ne’er have seen retribution taken upon Cornwall. When Cornwall puts out

his eyes, Gloucester & # 8217 ; s vision becomes clear from this point on, and he

subsequently discovers that Cornwall was killed. Ironically, Gloucester does

non see retribution until after he is blinded. In this sense, Cornwall

besides suffers from clouded vision because his decease is a direct consequence

of his blinding of Gloucester, when a servant kills him. As a consequence,

Gloucester is spared and his vision is cleared, while Cornwall is left

a victim of his ain faulty vision.

From this point onwards, Gloucester learns to see clearly by

utilizing his bosom to see alternatively of his eyes. It is apparent that he

realizes this when he says:

I have no manner and hence want no eyes ;

I stumbled when I saw. Full oft & # 8217 ; Ti seen,

Our agencies secure us, and our mere defects

Prove our trade goods. ( IV.i.18-21 )

In this, he is stating that he has no demand for eyes because when he had

them, he could non see clearly. He realizes that when he had eyes, he

was confident that he could see, while in world, he could non see

until his eyes were removed. Afterwards, he sees with his head alternatively

of his eyes.

Gloucester & # 8217 ; s vision can be contrasted with that of Lear. While

Lear has the physical sight that Gloucester lost, Gloucester has the

clearer vision that Lear will ne’er derive. When Lear and Gloucester

meet near the drops of Dover, Lear inquiries Gloucester & # 8217 ; s province:

No eyes in your

caput, nor no money in your bag? Your eyes are

in a heavy instance, your bag in a visible radiation, yet you

see how this universe goes.

Gloucester. I see it feelingly. ( IV.vi.147-151 )

Here, Lear can non associate to Gloucester because his vision is non

clear, and he wonders how Gloucester can see without eyes. Although

Lear has seen his errors, he still believes that sight comes merely

from the eyes. Gloucester tells him that sight comes from within.

Vision is the consequence of the head, bosom, and emotions put together,

non merely physical sight. This is a construct that Lear will ne’er

understand.

In King Lear, clear vision is an attribute portrayed by the

chief characters of the two secret plans. While Lear portrays a deficiency of

vision, Gloucester learns that clear vision does non emanate from the

oculus. Throughout this drama, Shakespeare is stating that the universe can non

genuinely be seen with the oculus, but with the bosom. The physical universe

that the oculus can observe can consequently conceal its immoralities with physical

properties, and therefore clear vision can non ensue from the oculus entirely.

Lear & # 8217 ; s ruin was a consequence of his failure to understand that

visual aspect does non ever represent world. Gloucester avoided a

similar death by larning the relationship between visual aspect and

world. If Lear had learned to look with more than merely his eyes, he

might hold avoided this calamity.

33c