Descarted Meditations Essay, Research Paper

Clear and Distinct Percept:

An Analysis Of Rene Descartes

Rene Descartes? Meditations in the First Philosophy is a skeptic? s guess on certain unalienable truths. Descartes speculations are based on the epistemic theory of rationalism: that is if person genuinely knows something so they could non perchance be mistaken. He provides solid statements for what his six speculations stand for, and how he obtained a clear and distinguishable perceptual experience of & # 8220 ; innate & # 8221 ; thoughts. In Meditations he comes to footings with three certainties: the being of the head as the thing that thinks, the organic structure as an extension, and God as the supreme being. He attests that he came to these decisions by doubting all that had been taught to him in his formal instruction, and all he received through the senses.

Descartes? first uncertainness was noted in Discourse of Method. & # 8220 ; I found myself embarrassed with so many uncertainties and mistakes that it seemed to me that the attempt to teach myself had no consequence other than the increasing find of my ignorance & # 8221 ; ( Baird p. 11 ) . He had difficultly encompassing the diverse, and sometimes hypocritical, thoughts he encountered in his surveies. He developed a disbelieving frame of mention ; this unsure point of position aided him in developing Meditations. All that he saw, tasted, touched, smelled and heard was caste into uncertainness. He thought all of his confusion and indeterminate thoughts were caused by the senses. Harmonizing to Descartes, & # 8220 ; The senses deceive, and it is prudent ne’er to swear wholly those who have deceived us even one time? ( Baird, Forrest E. p. 22 ) . He used the illustration of comprehending the Sun and the Moon. When both are looked upon from Earth, they appear to be about the same size and distance from our planet. Mathematicss, nevertheless reveal an tremendous difference in their size and distance. This is why he urgently needed to abandon all he had learned and acquired through the senses. Certainty surfaced beyond all that he doubted, and to cognize these certainties led Descartes to the truth.

To cognize, harmonizing to Descartes, was to hold a clear and distinguishable perceptual experience of an thought. One could comprehend thoughts clearly and clearly through a procedure O

f self-contemplation and contemplation. When a individual abandoned all that was received through the senses they were so able to infer the kernel of an thought. The kernel was the most basic foundation of being ; that is the simplest cosmopolitan truth. To cognize was to genuinely understand the kernel of a thing or thought.

The first thing Descartes was able to clearly and clearly perceive was the thought of the head. The head represented the ego or the thought of & # 8220 ; I & # 8221 ; . It did non stand for the ego as in physical visual aspects because the head has no physical properties. The head, harmonizing to Descartes? , is merely the thing that thinks. The kernel of the head is, & # 8220 ; A thing that uncertainties, understands, affirms, denies, is willing, is unwilling and besides imagines and has sensory perceptual experiences & # 8221 ; ( Baird, p. 13 ) .

He besides knew with certainty the thought of an drawn-out thing. By extension he means a organic structure or substance that exist in nature, and outside the intelligent thing. It was the kernel of that which he could depict with mathematical certainty. He emphasizes a differentiation between the head and organic structure. & # 8220 ; & # 8230 ; in every bit much as the organic structure is the really nature is ever divisible as the head is utterly indivisible. & # 8221 ; ( Baird, Forrest E. p. 53 )

Descartes clearly and clearly perceived an thought of a Supreme Being or God, the perfect infinite manifestation of head. & # 8220 ; By the word & # 8216 ; God & # 8217 ; I understand a substance that is infinite, independent, supremely intelligent, supremely powerful, and which created both myself and everything else that exists & # 8221 ; ( Baird, Forrest E. p. 34 ) . Descartes has a clear and distinguishable perceptual experience of God and grounds that it must be It that grants him the ability to clearly and clearly perceive God.

Descartes guesss on certainty may non hold satisfied an empiricist & # 8217 ; s point of position of experience as an indispensable component in cognition, but unfortunately, he was a positivist. So in Descartes? mind one can merely cognize with certainty the Mind as the believing thing, the Body as the drawn-out thing and God as a supreme being.

Bibliography:

Descartes, Rene. Meditations in the First Philosophy. In Baird, Forest E. and Walter Kaufmann, Modern Philosophy, 3rd Edition Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000.

331