Aberrance In Society Essay, Research Paper

How America & # 8217 ; s Social Structure Causes Deviance

How America & # 8217 ; s Social Structure Causes Deviance Although many people know that deviancy is evident in American society, few realize that it is society itself that causes deviancy. Our societal construction exerts legion force per unit areas among people in our society to prosecute in non-conforming and aberrant behaviour to accomplish the American dream. American society does this by stressing certain success ends, and non stressing the correct means to accomplish these ends. In add-on, deviancy is reinforced in legion elements of American societal construction through culturally defined ends, institutionalized agencies, social reactions, and assorted signifiers of countenances. Further, American society has a strong accent on wealth and an unreasonable demand for success. Therefore, Americans are lead to signifiers of invention, deviancy, and live in a province of anomy. First, we must analyze the definitions of aberrance and norms. Henry defines aberrance as a individual who goes against the criterions, outlooks, and norms of their society ( talk ) . Further, deviancy is thought of as a personal property or behaviour that consequences in societal disapproval from others, or behaviour that breaks the regulations and norms for that society ( Social Deviance 5 ) . Norms are regulations of behavior, and each norm is a statement of desirable or unwanted behaviour. Examples of desirable and unwanted provinces of being are messages like & # 8220 ; wear & # 8217 ; t be excessively fat & # 8221 ; and & # 8220 ; wear & # 8217 ; t be excessively thin & # 8221 ; ( Social Deviance 5 ) . In add-on, norms are the shared outlooks and ratings of behaviour or being that the bulk of society & # 8217 ; s members agree upon. Meier states that outlooks refer to how people will move or be, and ratings are how people should move or be ( Social Deviance 5 ) . These outlooks and ratings further reenforce the criterions and outlooks of our society. Some sociologists antecedently believed that aberrance was caused by biological science. Sociologists one time believed that aberrant people were & # 8220 ; born bad & # 8221 ; , and that heredity, cistrons, and a individuals organic structure chemical science were all common denominators in aberrant people. Merton contradicts this theory by observing that: With the more recent promotion of societal scientific discipline, this set of constructs has undergone basic alteration. For one thing, it no longer appears so obvious that adult male is set against society in an ageless war between biological urge and societal restraint. For another, sociological positions have progressively entered into the analysis of behavior diverting from prescribed forms of behavior. For whatever function the biological urges, there still remains the farther inquiry of why it is that the frequence of aberrant behaviour varies within different societal construction and how it happens that the divergences have different forms and form in different societal constructions. ( 230 ) Now sociologists, such as Robert K. Merton, have new insight into the theory that deviancy is caused by the society in which we live, non biological science or organic structure chemical science. This theory of aberrance is besides backed up by the belief that American society leads an person to desire the American dream, but does non afford them with the agencies to accomplish them ( Faning ) . As members of a society obsessed with telecasting and media, we have force per unit areas that reinforce the popular belief that stuff ownerships and wealth are highly of import in American society. Therefore, it is sensible to believe that if we can turn up certain groups subject to the force per unit areas of accomplishing the American dream, we should anticipate to happen high rates of deviancy in its members. In add-on, some societal categories do non hold equal chance to accomplish ends. Due to favoritism, members of lower categories, and certain racial and cultural minorities, all suffer from blocked chances. The emphasis and strain that consequences from out of use chances causes the single to oppugn the legitimacy of traditional and institutionalised agencies ( Faning ) . In consequence, these members of society begin to believe of other, frequently illegal, ways to win. Furthermore, when this occurs, regard for the traditionally recognized agencies of accomplishing ends crumble, norms weaken, and society is no longer able to modulate the methods its members use to obtain success. Therefore, high offense among lower categories can be attributed to the emphasiss caused by American society. If a individual is born into a hapless household, they might be forced to work while traveling to high school, and may non be able to concentrate on school work, like other schoolmates. Therefore, due to life opportunities, they might non hold the chance to travel to college due to bad classs or unaffordability. While invariably fighting to do terminals run into, they decide to perpetrate a offense to be able to hold material ownerships, since they believe that they will ne’er be able to salvage up to purchase anything through traditional work. This new societal theory provinces that deviancy is people merely reacting usually to the societal state of affairs in which they are in. Furthermore, Merton states that & # 8220 ; some societal constructions exert definite force per unit areas upon certain individuals in the society to prosecute in nonconforming, instead than conforming behavior & # 8221 ; ( 230 ) . In add-on, aberrance varies civilization to civilization. What we consider to be aberrant is different than what other societies consider aberrant. Aberrant definitions besides change quickly. American society used to believe that adult females who wore short skirts, or smoked coffin nails were aberrant. Now, the same Acts of the Apostless are non considered to still be aberrant. In add-on, Merton notes that & # 8220 ; some societal constructions exert a definite force per unit area upon certain individuals in society & # 8221 ; ( 230 ) . American society is a perfect illustration of a society that exerts unreasonable force per unit areas, and hence leads some of its members to deviant behaviour. This societal theory is proven farther by Merton & # 8217 ; s theory of societal construction. In American society, Merton believes that there are two elements of societal construction ; culturally defined ends, and institutionalised agencies. Culturally defined ends are integrated into society, affecting assorted grades of value and significance. Culturally defined ends are what society thinks its members should endeavor for, such as fiscal success. Institutionalized agencies are the ordinances and norms that are the acceptable manner of accomplishing the culturally defined end ( 234 ) . An illustration of a culturally defined end is a good instruction, and a good occupation. Our society gives a strong societal reaction to those who deviate its norms. Social reactions embrace the ways in which society responds to the persons, their Acts of the Apostless, or suspected aberrance. Forms of social reactions are countenances and formal countenances. Sanctions are & # 8220 ; penalties normally designed to command fishy or existent aberrance & # 8221 ; ( Social Deviance 5 ) . Formal countenances are the penalties administered by the province or other signifier of legal authorization. Examples of formal countenance are mulcts or imprisonment. Most frequently these formal countenances have a negative stigma attached to them. Furthermore, countenances are the ultimate measurement rod for placing deviancy and aberrant Acts of the Apostless. An illustration would be a individual given the formal countenance of a prison sentence being labeled a & # 8220 ; ex-con & # 8221 ; . Informal countenances are countenances from less official beginnings, such as household, equals and friends. Examples of informal countenances are ridicule, peer disapproval, and unfavorable judgment ( Social Deviance 5 ) . The following point to discourse is the common types of aberrance that consequence from the force per unit areas that American society puts on its members. Merton says that members of American society are sometimes forced to introduce to make the ends society prescribes for them. First, ends are internalized and thought of as of import, such as desiring a nice auto, money, and a place. These people conform to the outlooks society gives them, and hence seek to accomplish the ends. The individual who wants a auto to be accepted in society, so they conform by traveling to college to acquire a good occupation, to be able to purchase the auto. The job occurs when members want these things, but may non hold entree to them. Therefore, this leads individuals to hold to introduce to accomplish these ends ( Merton 233 ) . An pioneer may be a individual who is unable or unwilling to travel to college to acquire a god occupation, so they rob a bank to be able to purchase the place and auto, and hence can suit in to societies material demands. Deviancy is besides caused by the legion contradictions and fluctuations American society has on what avenues are thought of as acceptable ways of accomplishing the ends. In add-on, our society besides has many dual criterions about what is seen as acceptable. Some cheat the system, but may be thought of as being cunning, or smart. On the other manus, some every bit dishonorable Acts of the Apostless have penalties, and are looked down upon by members of our society. An illustration of this is when a concern proprietor monetary value holes. Even thought the concern proprietor is being exploitatory, he is thought of as a concern mastermind, and intelligent. Peoples who cheat on their revenue enhancements, or acquire paid under the tabular array are dishonest and utilizing morally incorrect ways of achieving money. However, these violators are non criticized, looked down upon, or idea of as felons. An illustration of this doubl

e criterion is when we find an illegal act with the absence of societal disapproval. Without societal disapproval, an illegal act is non considered to be genuinely aberrant ( Faning ) . An mundane happening of this disagreement is when person is caught rushing. The act of hurrying is illegal and punished with formal countenances, such as mulcts, tickets, or license suspension, but is accepted in our society. We have constabularies officers that are paid to modulate the main roads, but no negative stigma attached to the act of hurrying, or the penalty given by legal authorization. The demand for success in American society is overpowering. Success has become constructed as “winning the game” instead than “winning under the regulations of the game.” Through the same procedure, tenseness generated by the desire to win in a fire hook game is relieved by a successful dealing one’s self four ones, or when scuffling the cards in a game of solitaire. Merton states that “cultural ( or idiosyncratic ) hyperbole of the success – ends leads work forces to retreat emotional support from the rules” ( 232-233 ) . On the other manus, a individual who robs a bank to achieve money is labeled a felon, and given penalties. Peoples who mug, rob, and burglarize are feared and hated in our society, but deceivers, plagiarists, and false witnesss are non. These dual criterions create confusion, and lead members of our society to experience as if they are without counsel or clear ethical motives. The following statement turn outing how American society causes aberrance is due to American society seting excessively much accent on ends, and non adequate value attached the correct means to accomplish these ends. Merton states that “American civilization continues to be characterized by a heavy accent on wealth as a basic symbol of success, without a corresponding accent upon the legitimate avenues on which to process toward this goal” ( Social Structure 235 ) . Due to this deficiency of clear counsel, strong societal force per unit area to accomplish, and unequal ways to accomplish the force per unit areas society inflicts causes members to be aberrant to achieve acceptable position in our society. Merton farther emphasizes that: Of the types of societies that result from independent fluctuations of cultural ends and institutionalised agencies, we shall chiefly be concerned with the first – a society in which there is an exceptionally strong accent upon specific ends without matching accent upon institutional processs. No society lacks norms regulating behavior. But societies do differ in the grade in which the folkways, mores, and institutional controls are efficaciously integrated with the ends which stand high in the hierarchy if cultural values. The civilization may be such as to lead persons to focus on their emotional strong beliefs upon the composite of culturally acclaimed terminals, with far less emotional support for the prescribed methods of making out to these terminals. As this procedure continues, the society becomes unstable and there develops what Durkheim called “anomie, ” or normlessness. ( 232 ) Anomie is caused by a society without clear norms, such as American society. Bing without institutionalised construction, outlooks, and ordinances, leads people to go disorientated. Capitalist societies, such as America, are perfect illustrations of alienated societies. Through pitiless competition and deficiency of ethical motives and values, capitalists strive for money. Therefore, our societal order becomes disquieted and people lose their manner in chase of wealth without existent ordinance. In add-on, money in our society is thought of as more of import than honestness, ethical motives, household, and felicity. As Merton states “in some big step, money has been consecrated as a value in itself, over and above its outgo for articles of ingestion and or its usage for sweetening of power. “Money” is a particularly good adapted to go a symbol of prestige” ( 233 ) . Money can purchase category, power and position, all of which are extremely regarded in American society. Simmel emphasizes that money is extremely abstract and impersonal. However acquired, fraudulently or institutionally, money can be used to buy the same goods and services ( Lighting Social Life 84 ) . Therefore, it doesn’t truly count how one gets money ; it merely affairs that one has money. The following statement as to why American society leads its members to be aberrant is because our society puts a enormous accent on wealth and success. Merton states that the United States has three cultural maxims. The first maxim is that everyone should endeavor for the American dream, which are wealth, success and independency. The 2nd maxim provinces that present failure is merely a little reverse ; 3rd, the lone existent failure is personal failure, and the backdown of aspiration ( 235 ) . This societal construction puts enormous sums of force per unit area on all persons in American society. Our society looks down upon members who do non hold wealth or success. Furthermore, there is a negative attitude towards people who do non wish to accomplish the “American Dream.” Some members of our society are satisfied with what they have, and do non endeavor for rises, publicities, or anything greater. These people are thought of as lazy, missing aspiration and work ethic, and put down in our society for merely being content with what they have. In decision, many people think that money will work out all of their jobs, and give them happiness. On the contrary, many affluent people are suffering, and their money has created legion jobs for them. Merton notes that when he was an perceiver of a community in which the common one-year was in the six figures. He witnessed one victim of the American Dream stating, “in this town, I’m snubbed socially because I merely acquire a thousand a hebdomad. That hurts” ( 233 ) . Competition among neighbours, community, colleagues, and nine members is overpowering. Even after accomplishing pecuniary success, it seems every bit is there is no halting point to the sum of money some strive for. Merton states that “in the American Dream there is no concluding fillet point. The step of “monetary success” is handily indefinite and relative” ( 232 ) . No affair how much money 1 has, it is ne’er plenty. No 1 can be “too rich” in America. Durkheim states that “to prosecute a end that is unachievable is to reprobate 1s self to a province of ageless sadness. Our passions must foremost be limited by a moral force” ( Suicide 229 ) . Since we put force per unit area on ourselves to make unachievable ends, we are hence ever dissatisfied with our lives. These societal force per unit areas that are reinforced in about every facet of American society can farther explicate aberrance. Merton states that: To state that the end of pecuniary success is entrenched in American civilization is to state that Americans are bombarded on every side by principles which affirm the right or, frequently, the responsibility of retaining the end even in the face of perennial defeat. Prestigeful representatives of the society reinforce the cultural accent. The household, the school, and the workplace- the major bureaus determining the personality construction and end formation of America- articulation to supply the intensive subject required if an person is to retain integral a end that remains elusively beyond range. ( 233 ) One of the major bureaus that form immature Americans ethical motives and values is our instruction system. Our instruction system places great accent on classs, trial tonss, and grade point norms. It seems that accomplishing these things is more of import than truly learning and retaining information. Therefore, this leads to rip offing on trials, corrupting professors, and changing transcripts, and all of which are signifiers of dishonesty and aberrance. Durkheim believes that one time our society brings back ethical motives and values we will get down to set up more acceptable and reinforced ways of accomplishing ends ( Anomie 79 ) . We must put accomplishable ends for ourselves and set more accent on achieving felicity, non pecuniary success.

Agnew, Robert. & # 8220 ; A Longitudinal Trial of Social Control Theory and Delinquency. & # 8221 ; Journal of Research and Crime and Delinquency. 28 ( 1991 ) : 126-156. Durkheim, Emile. & # 8220 ; Anomie and the Modern Division of Labor. & # 8221 ; Social Theory 70. Durkheim, Emile. & # 8220 ; Suicide and Modernity. & # 8221 ; Social Theory 229-41. Fanning, Patricia. & # 8220 ; Social Structure and Anomie. & # 8221 ; Class Lecture. Bridgewater State College. Bridgewater, 29 October 1999. Henry, Richard. & # 8220 ; Deviance and Social Control. & # 8221 ; Class Lecture. Bridgewater State College. Bridgewater, 9 September 1999. Hornsby, Anne M. & # 8220 ; Surfboarding the Net for Community: A Durkheim Analysis of Electronic Gatherings. & # 8221 ; Illuminating Social Life. Ed. Peter Kivisto. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge P, 1998. 82-84. Krohn, Marvin and James Massey. & # 8220 ; Social Control and Delinquent Behavior. & # 8221 ; The Sociological Quarterly 21, ( 1980 ) : 529-544. Lemert, Charles. & # 8220 ; Social Theory: Its Uses and Pleasures. & # 8221 ; Social Theory 1-20. Lemert, Charles. , erectile dysfunction. Social Theory: The Multicultural and Classic Readings. 2nd erectile dysfunction. Boulder: Westview, 1999. Merton, Robert K. & # 8220 ; Social Structure and Anomie. & # 8221 ; Social Theory 229-41. Mills, C. Wright. & # 8220 ; The Sociological Imagination. & # 8221 ; Social Theory 115-123. Ward, David A. , Timothy J. Carter, and Robin D. Perrin. Social Aberrance: Being Behaving and Branding. Needham Highs: Allyn and Bacon, 1994. Weber, Max. & # 8220 ; Class Status and Party. & # 8221 ; Social Theory 115-23.