Barbara Kimenye’s “The Winner. ” is an first-class illustration of a short narrative that does non needfully utilize all five of the literary elements to their fullest potency. but still creates a sense of organic integrity. In this analysis. the elements are organized in the order of subject. secret plan. word picture. scene. and so construction. Each component will be described and so “The Winner” and the events in it will be related to the elements.
The intent of the subject of a narrative is to supply penetration to the reader about the author’s point-of-view on the subject they chose to compose approximately. Subject can be communicated in two ways. both of which Ms. Kimenye utilized. One is to uncover the subject straight through a statement that a character makes. and the other is to let the reader to construe the subject based on the actions and reactions of the characters. She relates money and felicity throughout the narrative to convey her subject. Her usage of description through the characters stressed her point really clearly. She used the right symbols. such as people. in the proper manner to assist the reader understand the intent and significance of the symbol. Overall. the manner she incorporated the subject into the narrative could be considered to run from good to excellent.
The secret plan of a narrative should hold an component of suspense and sarcasm in it to do the reader want to go on reading. It should besides include at least one major complication. that is. the supporter or another character is blocked from making what they want to make. While all of this is traveling on. the order or events and relationship between events still has to do sense to the reader. There was a great trade of sarcasm presented in the terminal of the narrative when Pius ended up altering his sentiment of Cousin Sarah and get marrieding her. which the reader didn’t expect. Barbara Kimenye besides kept the events in the narrative organized by some signifier and made it really simple for the reader to understand what was traveling on. While she fulfilled most of the features of a good secret plan. one seemed to be missing. There could hold been more tenseness between characters present in the narrative.
Ms. Kimenye made fantastic usage of the element word picture. In short narratives. non much deepness is required as to the character’s personalities. It is merely needed that any reader be able to link with one character. However. in this narrative. one seemed to cognize Pius’ personality and by the terminal. could about foretell what his reactions would be to events.
The scene in this narrative was slightly described literally. but most good writers try to do a touch on nonliteral scenes besides. The scene is the conditions prior to the narrative. and should be described in lucidity and item. In this choice. one had a general thought of Pius’ milieus. but no information presented was of all time highly detailed so that the reader could do a distinguishable image in their caput.
Finally. the construction of a short narrative should ever be fictional and written in prose. It should besides incorporate no more than one secret plan and should be based on the secret plan instead than the characters. Short narratives do non normally use all five literary elements clearly and with a great deepness. although they are still present in some signifier. Ms. Kimenye chose a construction to compose in at the beginning of the narrative and. for the most portion. she stuck to all of the guidelines with it. although some things she did in the narrative may hold been forcing it a small spot.
In general. Barbara Kimenye used the five elements together in a manner that most readers can understand and construe to intend many things. The narrative could hold been written better. but the writer placed the elements together in a manner that worked. regardless of whether or non she used them all to their full potency.
