Use Of Literary Elements Essay, Research Paper

Use of Literary Elementss

There are many of import elements to The Catcher in the Rye but there are two that stand out from the remainder by a great border. These elements of the novel are the message that the book gives to reader every bit good as the manner of composing that J.D. Salinger uses while composing the book. The messages can be seen clearly and are really of import to the book, but they are non an original subject for a book. What does put the thoughts in this book apart from other books with the same subject is the composing manner that Salinger uses in the book ; this authorship manner is called watercourse of consciousness authorship.

Stream of consciousness authorship is a type of composing that is non typically used in books because of its well defined bounds. These bounds are that when utilizing watercourse of consciousness narrative, the narrative line is required to go around around one and merely one chief character if the authorship is to be effectual. With S. of C. composing it is besides required that the writer develop the chief character highly good into a really credible individual both emotionally and physically through ideas and actions. To compose an effectual book in this authorship manner an writer must be exceptionally talented, and gratefully Mr. Salinger is merely that. The S. of C. composing manner is used efficaciously with the character of Holden Caulfield in The Catcher in the Rye because the narrative line Mr. Salinger developed follows Holden specifically every bit good as the fact that the capable affair of the book is one of an personal nature.

The thoughts in the book are presented as ideas of Holden through out the narrative. These subjects include the fakeness of the universe, every bit good as the rebellion against the universe that many adolescents have. Holden does non like the hypocrites in the universe and invariably voices his sentiment about it every bit good. The rebellion against the universe in non a witting thing that Holden does but it is evident in the narrative line of the book. An illustration of this rebellion is the changeless usage of profanity in the book. Salinger makes good usage of the changeless profanity to demo this rebellion but because of Holden+s character it is non out of context. Because Holden is upper-middle category and educated he used profanity to represent points that he is seeking to do, non because he is cursing out of choler. Basically Salinger has Holden swear because he knows that it is socially unacceptable but he can make it because of his good instruction as a daze factor.

Another good usage of of how the watercourse of consciousness composing manner is used as literary tool is with in the ideas of Holden. In The Catcher in the Rye the character of Holden Caulfield is a mentally unstable individual, he is em

otional and baffled. The S. of C. composing manner is effectual to show this thought because of its abrasiveness and speedy gait, merely as the mental province of a mentally unstable individual would be. The rambling of the internal ideas of Holden are entertaining yet uncommonly existent to all of us which causes the reader to inquire what his mental province is. The changeless idea about the underlying thoughts besides are presented good with S. of C. composing manner because when in existent life you can non acquire a topic off your head normally until you really do a determination about it.

The concluding literary tool that is of import to the narrative that Salinger does good in The Catcher in the Rye is the development of characters. Throughout the narrative Mr. Salinger is invariably developing Holden merely as you would acquire to cognize him if you were run intoing him. The utmost development surrounding on overdevelopment is good though because the narrative revolves around Holden and Holden merely. Many critics of Salinger say that he underdevelops the other characters in The Catcher in the Rye but I believe he does this intentionally. If Salinger were to develop characters like Phoebe, and Sally every bit good as he does Holden the point of the narrative would hold been lost. The narrative is being told by Holden from a mental establishment so evidently he is traveling to be the centre of the narrative because all people are selfish if they are given the chance. The different degrees that people are developed, I believe, are besides indexs of the different degrees of regard that Holden has for people. If you look at people he held in great regard, for good or bad grounds, they are normally developed moderately good like Phoebe, Allie, and Sally. Peoples that Holden did non esteem though were developed in about no item which indicated that they made no existent impact on him and hence had no existent relevancy in the narrative.

Throughout the narrative there are several specific illustrations of these literary tools that Salinger did or did non utilize to do his narrative effectual. The book as a whole was the phase for the off round composing manner of watercourse of consciousness as good. I believe that Salinger did a good occupation with the different degrees of character development every bit good as developing the secret plan in a manner that encouraged the readers to believe about these issues on their ain every bit good as while reading the book. His endowment as a author is obvious because of the fact that he has gained so much celebrity for this work, every bit good as the fact that readers of all ages can associate to the issues that Holden is confused approximately, non merely adolescents around Holden+s ain age. Overall J.D. Salinger did a great occupation with the proficient portion of composing this book and he did a even better occupation acquiring the messages that he wanted across to the readers.