HeadGear, Inc. Essay Sample

Free Articles

HeadGear. Inc is a little maker of earphones for usage in commercial and personal applications. The HeadGear earphones are known for their outstanding sound quality and light weight. which makes them extremely desirable particularly in the commercial market for telemarketing houses and similar communicating applications. despite the comparatively high monetary value. Although demand has grown steadily. net incomes have grown much more easy. and John Hurley. the CEO. suspects productiveness is falling. and costs are lifting out of manus. John is concerned that the diminution in net income growing will impact the stock monetary value of the company and suppress the firm’s attempts to raise new investing capital. which will be needed to go on the firm’s growing. While the house is now runing at 68 % of available production capacity. John thinks the market growing will shortly transcend available capacity.

To better profitableness. John has decided to convey in a new COO with the aim of bettering profitableness really rapidly. The new COO understands that net incomes must be improved within the coming 10-18 months. A fillip of 10 % of net income betterment is promised the new COO if this end is achieved. The followers is the income statement for HeadGear for 2010. from the most recent one-year study. Merchandise costs for HeadGear include $ 25 per unit variable fabrication costs and $ 1. 920. 000 per twelvemonth fixed fabrication operating expense. Budgeted production was 120. 000 units in 2010. Selling and administrative costs include a variable part of $ 15 per unit and a fixed part of $ 2. 400. 0000 per twelvemonth. The same units costs and production degree are besides applicable for 2009. HeadGear Inc.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Income Statement for the Period Ended 12/31/2010
Gross saless ( 125. 000 @ $ 75 ) $ 9. 375. 000
Cost of Gross saless:
Get downing Inv: 5. 000 @ $ 41 $ 205. 000
Cost of Production: 120. 000 @ $ 41 4. 920. 000
Goods Available: 130. 000 $ 5. 125. 000
Less Ending Inv: 0 @ $ 41 -0- $ 5. 125. 000
Gross Margin $ 4. 250. 000
Selling and Administrative
Variable Costss: 125. 000 @ $ 15 $ 1. 875. 000
Fixed Costss 2. 400. 000 $ 4. 275. 000
Net loss $ & lt ; 25. 000 & gt ;










The new COO is convinced that the job is the demand to sharply market the merchandise. and that the evident diminution in productiveness is truly due to underutilization of capacity. The COO increases fixed fabrication costs to $ 2. 100. 000 and variable merchandising costs to $ 16 per unit and fixed merchandising costs to $ 2. 750. 000 to assist accomplish this end. Budgeted gross revenues and production for 2008 are set at 175. 000 units. Actual production was 175. 000 as planned but gross revenues for 2008 turned out to be merely 140. 000 units. short of the mark. The new COO claims that net incomes have increased well. and is looking frontward to the promised fillip. REQUIRED:

1. Calculate the soaking up cost net income for 2011. presuming the new merchandising costs. and that fabrication costs remain the same as 2010. 2. Calculate the variable cost net income for 2011 and explicate why it is different from the soaking up cost net income. 3. Is the new COO due a fillip? Remark on the effectivity of Hurley’s program to better net incomes by engaging the new COO and assuring the fillip. 4. Identify and explicate any of import ethical issues you see in this instance.

1. Calculate the soaking up cost net income for 2011. presuming the new merchandising costs. and that fabrication costs remain the same as 2010. See affiliated Excel sheet for calculation. The instance references 2008 where I believe they are discoursing 2011 premises. Besides. the demand says to utilize 2010 fabrication costs so I didn’t utilize the new fixed costs mentioned in the instance. However. if you need to alter these premises based on your professor’s instructions. you can alter the premises ( xanthous cells ) and the full solution will update absolutely. 2. Calculate the variable cost net income for 2011 and explicate why it is different from the soaking up cost net income. See the affiliated Excel sheet for calculation and rapprochement by demoing the stoping stock list costs.

3. Is the new COO due a fillip? Remark on the effectivity of Hurley’s program to better net incomes by engaging the new COO and assuring the fillip. No. the COO is non due a fillip. The ground the net incomes seem higher under soaking up costing is that there are significant fixed costs of the period that were capitalized because production was so much higher than gross revenues. The fixed costs is trapped on the balance sheet and will be expensed when the points are sold. See rapprochement in Excel for a ocular on this. 4. Identify and explicate any of import ethical issues you see in this instance. In finding the fixed costs per unit for the period for soaking up costing ( non needed for variable costing since the full fixed cost is expensed as a cost of the month. non a cost of units ) . you spread the fixed costs across all the units made. Since production was increased well. the fixed cost per unit was reduced: Fixed fabrication cost per unit:

at 140. 000 units $ 13. 71
at 175. 000 units $ 10. 97
This gives the semblance of lower cost of goods sold ( and therefore higher net incomes ) but it is. in fact. merely a impermanent capitalizing of the fixed fabrication costs due to stock list construct up. While constructing stock lists does “trap” fixed costs on the balance sheet. coercing directors to better net incomes gives them an inducement to construct stock lists to distribute the fixed costs dilutant and do COGS smaller per unit. This is non ethical. Constructing stock lists in order to better a net income calculation is non profession or ethical but the force per unit area to execute can make such a enticement.

Your tutorial is 315 words plus three exhibits in Excel ( attached ) and includes a treatment of how building stock lists impacts net incomes. An ethical consideration is mentioned. The excel templet can be used with other similar soaking up versus variable bing methods as the expressions point to the premise cells and can be updated for any job. Click in cells to see calculations. This should give you a general thought so you can make a study in your ain words.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

x

Hi!
I'm Katy

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out