Part I

1. Productiveness of the crew would be below standard. I believe for the productiveness to be below standard because they were sent to this crew because of their deficiency of work. Merely because they have been assigned to another crew. does non intend that they will get down to work good right off. When compared to the Equity Theory. I believe there to be positive unfairness for the three work forces assigned to the new group. For being assigned to the group due to miss of work. it is unjust to hold a higher wage class than those who have been in the company for a longer period of clip and who are making their occupation right. This may do issues with subprofessionals being motivated to work to their full potencies because they may see it as being unjust and at the same clip the professionals may believe they do non necessitate to work every bit difficult.

2. Sailors would be reasonably satisfied with their occupation. I believe that the sailors would be more satisfied with their old occupation. but may non suit in really good with the bing group. Some of the sailors have been working at that place for rather a piece longer and acquiring either the same wage or less. In add-on. the bing sailors may turn frustrated in holding to pick up for the slack of the new crew members depending on the new crew members motive. I do believe the inducements given for good work are good. but I believe the wage class should be based on how long you have been with the company and your degree of end product and non centralized on instruction which is how it appears.

3. Group members would acquire along with some but non others. I believe the bing crew members would go on to acquire along with one another but the new professionals will experience like foreigners. The bing subprofessionals will go on to acquire along all right with one another. but it may be difficult for them to accept the new professionals.

4. Sailors will. in footings of the given occupation description do what they are supposed to make. no more or less. If there is no motive for the occupation. so harmonizing to the motivational theory this will straight impact their degree of public presentation. The sailors who were assigned to this group are likely non happy with their reassignment. so at least in the beginning things may be slow.

5. Some subgroups will hold accepted the informal criterions about crew behaviour while others will non. The sailors who have been with the company for a longer period of clip may hold grown accustomed to the current criterions. The new sailors on the other manus may differ with the criterions and seek to implement new 1s. Since Kilkenny direction considered the leader and adjunct leader to be first-class Foresters and instructors. I believe they will implement new schemes which will better profit the crew as a whole.

Part II

My anticipations in portion I were reasonably accurate to the information provided in portion II. The bing sailors talked amongst one another at tiffin clip and the new sailors isolated themselves from the group. Extra information that would hold helped with prognostic truth could hold included information about the three new professionals past public presentation in other groups specifically. A description could hold included information about the sum of work done compared to fellow colleagues. Besides. if the professionals have been reassigned in the yesteryear could hold been added.

Part III

1. The first scheme will be successful. I believe this scheme to be an first-class thought because this would split the professionals up with bing workers. Not merely would this let them to acquire to cognize other subprofessionals better. but it would let the professionals to better understand how to work with the group as a whole.

2. The 2nd scheme will be unsuccessful. If the first portion were to neglect. I do non happen how the 2nd option will be successful. I think that a squad edifice exercising or precisely what the first scheme suggested should assist. The first scheme forces the professionals to work with the subprofessionals so they may turn a better relationship with one another. I do non believe the 2nd scheme to work because it seems like a last resort to merely divide them up and hope for the best.

3. Some other scheme will non be necessary. As explained earlier. I predict the first option to work because it forces them to work together. Since bing sailors have shown to be successful. it will let the professionals to join forces with the subprofessionals. The lone alternate I would propose is some kind of squad edifice exercising either exterior of work or on the occupation exercising that would do them hold to work together as a squad in order to finish a specific undertaking.

Part IV

My anticipations were wrong with the information from portion IV. I thought that doing them work with one another would convey them together and get down to work as a squad. I believe that the information provided was non sufficient plenty to give an accurate analysis ensuing in an analytical failure. It appears that the professionals merely do non hold the motive that the subprofessionals have to make the occupation at a sensible velocity. In portion I. it should hold given more background information on the professionals and why specifically they had been reassigned.