Who am I? What is it that defines that personality? Anzaldua argues in her essay that the linguistic communication is what defines one’s individuality. Language is so an of import constituent of civilization. and civilization is known to be a important definer of individuality. Peoples use linguistic communication to link to their individualities and pass oning their worlds and values to themselves and to the universe around them… In other words. linguistic communication is of import because people use it to show their ideas and beliefs. “People evolve a linguistic communication in order to depict and therefore command their circumstances” ( Baldwin 109 ) . Consequently. linguistic communication does non needfully specify individuality every bit much as individuality defines linguistic communication. Peoples decide on what linguistic communication to utilize in order to pass on with their communities harmonizing to their individualities. One’s individuality defines and regulates the usage of linguistic communication and non the reverse.

Peoples speak different linguistic communications ; this difference is used to place and separate between different people. different ethnicities and races. The human demand to belong to a group makes them stay to a specific linguistic communication and idiom that represents their specific community and distinguish it from the remainder. Language is what connects people to their communities ; they are straight connected to people who speak the same linguistic communication as them. Anzaldua argues that “Ethnic individuality is duplicate tegument to lingual. I am my language” ( Anzaldua 136 ) . which strongly supports the fact that linguistic communication is used to guarantee that people belong to group. Talking the same linguistic communication and utilizing the same looks defines to which group people belong to. it besides evaluates the truthfulness of the association. “Until I can take pride in my linguistic communication. I can non take pride in myself” . which fundamentally states that linguistic communication forms one’s individuality.

This statement nevertheless. does non use to all state of affairss and communities and is surely non changeless. There are people who can non place to a specific group but instead to a assortment of communal associations. Most people speak multiple linguistic communications ; each linguistic communication connects them to a specific civilization and group of people. Tan clearly references in her narrative that she had to talk two different linguistic communications to her Asiatic ma who had her ain made up English. Tan relates to both her Asiatic descent and American properties by utilizing her mom’s made up English to talk with her ma. and uses the proper English to give talks and talk to most Americans.

On the same evidences. Anzaldua learned through her life experiences to often utilize multiple types of English. and many other Dialects of proper Spanish and Mexican Spanish. She uses each linguistic communication to pass on. connect and affiliate to specific people harmonizing to their background. This proves that the premise that linguistic communication defines civilization and individuality fails. What happens to the people who speak many linguistic communications. do they non acquire the benefit and pride of belonging to a certain community? Rather the contrary. they belong to multiple communities and they choose which group they want to pass on with and with which linguistic communication. Peoples have the ability to exchange from a linguistic communication to another to be portion of a group and this supports the thought that individuality defines and forms linguistic communication. and non the antonym.

Language is used as a manner to place with people. but it is besides used to separate between them. Peoples use linguistic communication to distinguish between people and tie in them to a specific civilization and community harmonizing to the linguistic communication they speak. America is known for holding a diverse population. and people are identified based on their linguistic communication ; Mexicans can be recognized to be Mexicans because of their speech patterns even though they might be Caucasic. Tan argues that her ma spoke broken English that limited the people’s perceptual experience of her capacities. “People in section shops. Bankss. eating houses. did non take her seriously” ( Tan 144 ) which purely proves that people who do talk the proper linguistic communication of the specific group they happen to be in generates a different intervention than that a true English talker. Baldwin denounces that black Americans are treated otherwise than white Americans because they speak English with a different speech pattern.

When talking “Black English. you have confessed your parents. your young person. your school. your salary. your self-esteem. and. alas. your future” ( Baldwin 110 ) harmonizing to Baldwin. Peoples associate linguistic communication with background which so leads to take to handle that specific individual a talk to him a manner they associate with the people who speak that exact same linguistic communication. In this instance. for the minority. it is linguistic communication that assumes their behaviour. but for the other dominant group. it is individuality that shapes behavior. It is their individuality that tells them that a specific linguistic communication must be allocated with that specific type of individual and so handle them in the manner it is conventions set. Peoples speak a specific linguistic communication because it is in their individuality to make so. and they choose to handle people otherwise harmonizing to linguistic communication. This allows me to reason that individuality defines linguistic communication. and linguistic communication triggers behavior.

Language is a major important constituent of our mundane life ; it is used to distinguish between different classs of people. connect with one each group. and so take how they will turn to those people. Peoples argue that it is linguistic communication that defines which type of individual you are and forms your individuality. The statements and the writers I quoted evidently proved the contrary. and stated that it is one’s individuality that sets up and decides on the linguistic communication used.

Mentions:

Anzaldua. Gloria. «How to Tame a Wild Tongue. » Nancy R Comley. David Hamilton. Carl H Klaus. Robert Scholes. Nancy Sommers. Jason T ougaw. William claude dukenfields of Reading. New York: Bedford/ St. Martin’s. 2010. 131-141.

Baldwin. James. «If black English Isn’t a linguistic communication. Then Tell Me. What is. » Nancy R Comley. David Hamilton. Carl H Klaus. Robert Scholes. Nancy Sommers. Jason Tougaw. William claude dukenfields of Reading. Bedford/St. Martin’s. 2010. 109-113.

Tan. Amy. «Mother Tongue. » Nancy R Comley. David Hamilton. Carl H Klaus. Robert Scholes. Nancy Sommers. Jason Tougaw. William claude dukenfields of Reading. New York: Bedford/St. Matin’s. 2010. 142-147.