In 1995. a talk show host. by the name of Rush Limbaugh was quoted while reacting to a newspaper article written about a survey completed by the NCEA ( National Center for Economic Alternatives ) . Harmonizing to this newspaper article. the survey done by the NCEA claimed that American husbandmans use chemical fertilisers. and that due to our big economic system. little concerns. and households. America is a waste bring forthing state. Therefore. the intent of this essay is to analyse the logic of Rush Limbaugh’s address. given to reason against this survey.
In the first section of Rush’s address he refers to the NCEA as “environmentalist wackos” which is a common false belief made throughout his statement. This is referred to as a tu quoque false belief. which shows that merely because you are connected with a certain group of people does non intend you use to normally used stereotypes. The NCEA may hold done a survey associating to the environment but that doesn’t mean they are conservationists. When Rush refers to the NCEA as “wackos” . this is assailing personal character that is non straight relevant to the issue at manus. this false belief is know as ad hominem.
Rush argues with the survey. by first supporting American husbandmans and working the fact that husbandmans “never” receive congratulations for feeding the universe. We can reason two false beliefs from this accusal. one being over-generalizing ( utilizing such words as ne’er can easy be proven incorrect ) and ignoratio elenchi. which is an irrelevant response. Feeding the universe and utilizing chemical fertilisers are two different subjects that can non be compared logically. If you consider the statement closely you will besides cognize that husbandmans do receive congratulations. their payroll check is the wages.
When the NCEA concluded their survey. they stated that America was waste bring forthing. Rush attacked the NCEA for non sing our “economy a beckon of hope” . He argued that people from all around the universe want to come to America. This is once more a ignoratio false belief because it is merely irrelevant information. Haste is besides trying to appeal to a certain popular bias. he stated “American households have worked coevalss for a high criterion of life. no they’re non held up for congratulations. No! Alternatively they’re all trashed” . This statement is an ad populum false belief. because he is appealing to a certain group without any connexion to America being a waste bring forthing society.
He continues on during his address to sardonically propose that the NCEA would instead us give up our engineering and “live more like the Soviets” . This is an ad poplum statement appealing to people that fear communism. Rush is assailing the personal character of Soviets. which is ad hominem and he is perpetrating a tu quoque. which is saying that merely because person is a Soviet does non do them primitive. This statement can be merely concluded as a ignoratio statement and a slippery incline ( merely because one event takes topographic point does non put any connexion to another event ) because it is wholly irrelevant to America and its waste.
In Rush’s decision he tells the “environmentalist wackos” to close up and halt talking their sentiment. Rush is familiar of the rights of every American. their freedom of address. and is go againsting other peoples positions and is being unconstitutional. Rush thinks that by closing up the conservationists and inquiring them to turn to more constructive work like himself. he will extinguish the job. This is a straw-man false belief. because he is writhing the issue about.
After larning about false beliefs and there usage in turn outing person to be unlogical. I have determined that Rush Limbaugh has a really biest position point and does non ever use the right solutions for a job. He comes across like a really strong self-asserting individual with a convincing statement but does non utilize logic to beef up his beliefs.
