The Logic Behind The Assertion Essay, Research Paper

The Logic Behind the Assertion

In Martin Luther King Jr. ? s? Letter from Birmingham City Jail, ? he argues the normally believed premise that triping our rights as human existences precipitates force. Even though these actions may be nonviolent, those persons who have tried to convey about the truth have been condemned because their pursuits were believed to be a perturbation among society. The logic behind this allegation is in some manner sensible. Those who condemn the rebellions urge society to be respectful due to the necessity of maintaining jurisprudence and order. If society rebellions against the traditional orders, so it is believed that pandemonium will happen. Even though the actions are peaceable, society is urged non to take part in these attempts. Government is afraid that these actions will take society into even more harmful activities, such as war. They are even willing to travel against our basic constitutional rights in order to hold the events before they develop into violent onslaughts.

Within King? s? Letter, ? he backs up his statement by supplying premier illustrations of guiltless, non-violent happenings. He disproves? this averment? by demoing how those condemned are guiltless people who tried to convey about the truth. In his first illustration about a robbed adult male, King reveals that the adult male should be condem

ned because he, holding money, caused the force to happen. This statement can non be true because the adult male did non do the robber to steal his money. It is the robber? s mistake that this incident occurred because of his immorality. The robber should be punished as opposed to the adult male, who was merely keeping onto his ownerships. Another cardinal illustration of King? s is Jesus? dedication and fond regard to his God-driven will. King describes that Jesus? harmless devotedness to God should non and would non be the cause of his crucifixion. He was strictly following God? s manner and taking the manner into true redemption. In no manner was Jesus doing force through his instructions, although that is why he was crucified. The actuality is that Jesus was simply demoing Forth a alone life style, which had frightened others to set him to hush.

Logic and rhetoric have a really coincident relationship. With logic, a way of logical thinking is followed which shows Forth a truth. In order to turn out the truth, rhetoric must be applied to show that statement. Therefore, rhetoric debates how logical a affair can be. In King? s? Letter, ? he asserts rhetoric to contend the logic behind penalizing peaceable actions. King sees that it is non logical to penalize those who speak out in a peaceable mode, for they are the 1s who are the guiltless. In King? s? Letter, ? his rhetoric shows how inclined this statement appears.