Looking To The Future 1984 Essay Research

Free Articles

Looking To The Future 1984 Essay, Research Paper

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Looking to the Future

1984

& # 8220 ; WAR IS PEACE

FFREEDOM IS SLAVERY

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH & # 8221 ; ( Orwell 3 ) .

It is the twelvemonth 1984 in London, Oceania. Winston Smith is one of many people in Orwell s anticipation of the universe in the hereafter but is today s yesteryear. The universe appears as a dark and fearful topographic point where the lone rime or ground is created by Big Brother, swayer of the province and the head member of the Party. All of the above phrases in the motto show the power which is given to the Party ( authorities ) . The best description lies in the Newspeak word doublethink.

& # 8220 ; Doublethink means the power of keeping to contradictory beliefs in one s head at the same time, and accepting both of them. The Party rational knows in which way his memories must be altered ; he hence knows that he is playing fast ones with world ; but by the exercising of doublethink he besides satisfies himself that world is non violated & # 8221 ; ( Orwell 190 ) .

Many descriptions similar to this are given in the book and aid explicate the manner in which the socialist authorities of Oceania operates. It explains how a strong swayer can pull strings facts to suit his or her ain purposes, which is frequently what socialist swayers may hold done and still may make.

Many of the thoughts in 1984 were written to demo anticipations of what the universe might be like if people did non inquiry and act on what was go oning around them. Orwell wrote 1984 after World War II when socialist authoritiess which had gone incorrectly, like Russia, were going a powerful force in the universe. Orwell, holding one time fought against Communist Russia, saw how much of a unsafe power they could go in the hereafter, and in bend found it necessary to inform readers of what the hereafter could keep. 1984 is his thought of what a state, such as England in this book, would be like if a socialist authorities came into power. He writes of the control that can be presented by a swayer by fright. A swayer can utilize fright to su

ppress a individual s thoughts and do him or her believe what a swayer thinks or says. A good illustration of this is at the terminal when Winston has been caught and is relearning how to obey and ne’er doubt Big Brother.

& # 8220 ; TWO AND TWO MAKE FIVE & # 8221 ; ( Orwell 247 ) .

This was used in the context that Winston would believe whatever he was told. Whether it be this mathematical equation or who Oceania was at war with, he would believe it because of the fright of anguish.

Orwell presented a dark, fearful universe in his book. His fluent usage of the English linguistic communication creates the consequence that everything has a sense of darkness, hatred, or enigma. He explains many times of the & # 8220 ; Two Minutes Hate & # 8221 ; ( Orwell 54 ) and & # 8220 ; Hate Week & # 8221 ; ( Orwell 176 ) in order to demo the sum of hatred incorporated into the society of Oceania. These events are looks of hatred towards Oceania s enemy. The book begins in a drab temper and progresses into a happier, more positive one, but ends in a drab defeated felling. The book left me in a bad temper because I found that it projected the image that if one individual was of all time dominated by another, it would ne’er be possible to get away the domination.

My sentiment of the book mirrored the secret plan of the book. In the beginning when everything is really negative and cheerless, it was a long dragging procedure to read it. As the book progressed to a more hopeful promising province, I began to bask reading it. The terminal was dissatisfactory because of its deficiency of felicity and go forthing me with a sense that life is ever a no no-win state of affairs. After believing and discoursing the book with other people, I felt more attached to the book. By larning the state of affairs of the book and why he wrote it, I felt like the book showed of import thoughts.

Overall, my sentiment of the book is impersonal. I could hold done without reading it, but I besides gained a small cognition. It didn t consist of the sum of action and border of my place suspense that I enjoy. I found it difficult to sit down and read 1984, which was more of a individual s vision, instead than a developed narrative.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

x

Hi!
I'm Katy

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out