What should a company make when its nucleus merchandise is considered “unhealthy” or even “harmful” by the populace? Is it even possible for such a company survive and thrive ; or will it hold to close down its concern? McDonald’s fast nutrient has for a long clip been considered unhealthy by the populace. In recent old ages. the wellness witting tendencies have become progressively popular. Furthermore. many scientific surveies and findings have surfaced and successfully confirmed that children’s increasing consumption of fast nutrient. which frequently contains high Na content. sugars. saturated fats. and Calories. for a long period of clip would take to childhood fleshiness. Furthermore. corpulent kids have a much higher hazard of many wellness jobs such as coronary bosom disease. high blood force per unit area. diabetes. and certain cancers–all of which are fatal if left untreated.

In 2010. a female parent from California sued McDonald’s over the company’s selling pattern of Happy Meal. The female parent claimed that McDonald’s used tempting playthings to entice childs into Happy Meal. This case. which might be viewed by many as senseless and absurd. was one of McDonald’s biggest instances. In order to come out of the case in front. this largest fast nutrient concatenation had to undergo some major organisational alterations. In this paper. we would wish to utilize the cognition learned in the category to analyse the event ( the case ) and its effects on McDonald’s.

The paper will hold four chief parts. In the first portion. we provide a brief debut of the company. McDonald’s. and the case. In the 2nd portion. we will utilize the constructs learned in category to analyse Happy Meal’s influencing schemes and the organisational alterations during and after the suit. We believe that Happy Meal’s influencing schemes deserve our attending as they were the chief causes of the crisis. Since its Happy Meal’s act uponing tactics were so efficaciously and successfully executed. McDonald’s became the obvious mark of the mentioned legal difference. In the 3rd portion. we will offer our ratings. pros and cons. of McDonald’s schemes and tactics in managing the crisis.

Finally. in the 4th portion. depending on our rating of how McDonald’s control of the state of affairs. we want to offer our recommendation to parts of the company’s schemes which in our sentiments could hold been improved. Besides. since we overall felt that McDonald’s managed the crisis highly good. we recommend its schemes to be implemented to Jack in the Box. which faced a similar state of affairs to McDonald’s. However. unlike McDonald’s which smartly fight for the continuance of its utilizing playthings to force Happy Meal gross revenues. Jack in the Box decided to drop playthings in its Happy Meal when it was faced with the force per unit area from the populace. We believe McDonald’s execution of strategic alterations could hold helped Jack in the Box to set toys back to its Happy Meal.

& lt ; I & gt ; Introduction

McDonald’s Corporation is the world’s taking nutrient service organisation. The corporation started out as a little drive-through in 1948 by two brothers. Dick and Mac McDonald. In 1961. Raymond Albert Kroc. a salesman. saw a great chance in the market at the clip and bought the concern from the McDonald brothers. By 1967. McDonald’s began its first concern enlargement to states outside of the United States. This dogged enlargement resulted in the gap of 23. 000 McDonald’s eating houses in 110 states in 1994. Today. McDonald’s. the taking fast nutrient concatenation. had twice the market portion of its closest U. S. rival. Burger King. In fact. McDonald’s market portion represented 7 per centum of entire U. S. eating-out gross revenues ( Cohen. 2009. p8-2. p8-3 ) .

There are several major influences and factors–such as authorities. clients. societal tendencies. and so forth–which play an of import function in determining organisational behaviour. In the recent old ages. McDonald’s corporate image has been negatively affected by inauspicious promotion. For illustration. McDonald’s has been criticized of paying its employees low rewards and implementing an aggressive anti-union policy throughout its fast-food imperium. Furthermore. the corporation was to a great extent condemned by the populace for working kids market and doing childhood fleshiness. Indeed. McDonald’s has been utilizing advertisement which chiefly targeted kids.

As a consequence. harmonizing to the study to American school pupil in 1996. 96 per centum of all kids could place Ronald McDonald ( Cohen. 2011. p8-5 ) . How was McDonald’s able to accomplish the above consequence? McDonald’s kids marketing schemes were really simple but highly effective–to give little playthings as a intervention to kids in order to appeal to their involvements. With the perennial utilizations of this psychological influencing maneuver. kids would subconsciously do a connexion between McDonald’s and playthings. Therefore. kids. who were under the influences of McDonald’s selling schemes. could non assist to believe of McDonald’s whenever thought of playthings.

The complainant. Monet Parham. a California female parent of two. sued McDonald’s excessively working kids market on Oct 2010 ( Dan. 2011 ) . She claimed that McDonald’s gave out tempting playthings that come with the repasts in order to entice childs into unhealthy diet. The female parent besides stated that “McDonald’s make it so much harder to state no to her childs when they are truly want those toys” ( York. 2010 ) . The CSPI ( Center for Science in the Public Interest ) confirmed that “kids do non hold the cognitive adulthood to understand the persuasive purpose of advertising” ( York. 2010 ) . Subsequently on. the prohibition of functioning Happy Meals with playthings was easy passed by the Board of Supervisors in an 8-3 ballot. which would take consequence on Dec 1st. 2011 if McDonald’s didn’t meets the nutritionary criterions of repast in San Francisco boulder clay that clip ( San Francisco Happy Meal Toy Ban Takes Effect. 2012 ) .

McDonald’s rapidly made response to this event. The fast nutrient chain’s spokeswoman. Bridget Coffing. told the LA Times newspaper: “We are confident that parents understand and appreciate that Happy Meals are a fun dainty. with quality. right-sized nutrient picks for their kids that can suit into a balanced diet. ” ( York. 2010 ) . McDonald’s said that it would support itself against the case. Meanwhile. it started offering apple pieces and milks in the new Happy Meals. Finally. the San Francisco justice dismissed the suit since McDonald’s was able to run into the needed nutritionary criterions. In the following portion. we will measure this job relate to the construct of influence and organisational alteration.

& lt ; II & gt ; Course Concepts Related To The Event

Influence

“Influence is any communicating which produces a alteration in an action and/or an attitude in one or more people. ” Influence is one of the most of import direction schemes in any organisation. A strong influence tactic includes function of planning and duologue. set up credibleness. frame ends and common land. vividly reenforce your place and connect emotionally ( Wong. Influence and persuasion. 2012 ) .

In this instance. although McDonald’s was sued by tempting kids. they so occupied the kids market successfully. In order to set up an influence. 1 must first set up communication–exchanges of duologue. McDonald’s did good at emotional influence and insinuation. The company created a clown character named Ronald and featured it on local Television in early sixtiess. Then. people were employed to execute unrecorded Ronald McDonald buffoons at children’s birthday parties held in eating houses. Ronald McDonald had a charming touch with kids giving McDonald’s an of import advantage over its rivals in the kids market ( Cohen. 2011. p8-5 ) . With Ronald McDonald mascot so successful as a communicating tool. McDonald’s went one measure further to set up its credibleness in children’s heads.

This was non difficult for the taking fast nutrient concatenation as it is a common notion–and rather true–that kids are in most instances easy to act upon. Then. how did McDonald’s do kids swear it? The reply is easy–make the kids happy. For illustration. kids were happy when gifts such as Ronald dolls and wrist watchs were given free with every purchases of Happy Meals. McDonald’s besides used playthings of characters from popular films appeal to kids. In this facet. they used influence of insinuation efficaciously. Ingratiation agencies do something what the individual likes. For illustration. a recent and really successful Happy Meal publicity was a tie-in with the popular DreamWorks Animation movie “Shrek Forever After. ”

The repasts included plaything tickers fashioned after the movie’s characters Shrek. Donkey. Gingy and Puss in Boots ( Dan. 2011 ) . Furthermore. McDonald’s needed to make a common goal–as to what it stands for–with kids. With free playthings and the ever smiling Ronald McDonald. McDonald’s convinced kids that the company and its eating houses stands for felicity and enjoyment. However. merely set uping common end and credibleness is non adequate to do an effectual influence. the communicating message and/or thought must be vividly reinforced and emotionally connected with the mark audience. Harmonizing to the Fast Food FACTS Report. immature people viewed tremendous sums of fast nutrient advertisement.

Every twenty-four hours. the mean kindergartner saw 2. 8 fast nutrient ads on telecasting. the mean kid saw 3. 5. and the mean adolescent saw 4. 7. Teenss listened to about one wireless ad per twenty-four hours. Children were exposed to more than 1. 200 traditional fast nutrient ads per twelvemonth while teens saw and heard more than 2. 000. ( Harris. Schwartz & A ; Brownell. 2010. p132 )

Therefore. with its disbursement of $ 900 million in media in 2009. McDonald’s made certain that the company’s image was vividly reinforced and emotionally connected in the heads of many kids ( Harris. Schwartz & A ; Brownell. 2010. p132 ) . In amount. McDonald’s act uponing schemes were so successful that 90 per centum of the kids go to McDonald’s one time a month ( Fast Food Marketing to Children. 2010 ) .

However. McDonald’s effectual influencing schemes made it a mark for one of the biggest case in the fast nutrient industry. In the following portion. we will discourse how McDonald’s applied its strategic alterations to get the better of the crisis.

Organizational Change

For old ages. critics have been knocking McDonald’s and its function in America’s fleshiness problem–specifically the franchise’s aggressive selling schemes toward kids. As the case pointed out. McDonald’s used playthings to entice kids and in bend set childs up for a life-time of wellness jobs.

The leading and direction of an organisation must be prepared for a turbulent environment which demands more complex planning for the hereafter. The phrase “organizational change” is about a important alteration in the organisation. such as reorganisation or adding a major new merchandise or service. In fact. there are six forces making the demand of change—the altering nature of the work force. engineering. economic sciences dazes. altering societal tendencies. the “new” universe political relations. and the changing nature of competitions. ( Stephen. 1992. p. 270 )

From this case. we could happen groundss of a major force. altering societal tendency. As the wellness witting became a more and more popular. people will be looking for healthy nutrient that is low in Calories. fat and Na. In the American. childhood fleshiness has more than tripled in the last 30 old ages. Furthermore. harmonizing to the Centers for Disease Control. 70 per centum of corpulent kids have higher hazard for cardiovascular disease. and are at “greater hazard for bone and joint jobs. sleep apnea. and societal and psychological jobs such as stigmatisation and hapless self-esteem” ( “Centers for disease. ” 2012 ) .

The populaces pointed a finger at McDonald’s. the world’s largest fast nutrient company. who use of Happy Meal toys to entice kids. This state of affairs made McDonald’s under heavy unfavorable judgment from public wellness functionaries. parents. lawgivers and so on because they are frustrated with lifting childhood fleshiness rates and weak anti-obesity attempts from fast nutrient eating house operators.

Oftentimes. organisations are confronted with jobs in the environment or with internal eventualities proposing that “current ways of making things are non effective” ( Miller. 2012. p180 ) . When confronting the changing forces. organisations frequently make alterations bit by bit. Of class. the execution of planned alteration is neither a simple nor a straight-forward procedure ( Miller. 2012. p181 ) . In fact. it took McDonald’s six old ages ( from 1984 to 1990 ) to respond to coerce group tactics and judicial proceeding before get downing to accommodate its service offer to the dietetic concerns of its clients. At the really get downing. the company merely made some modestly alterations. such as utilizing light oil. adding 2 % milk into the bill of fare before really establishing new merchandises such as the McVeggie. the McLean. and pizza in the 1990s ( Joanne & A ; Caroline. 2006 ) .

If we consider McDonald’s step-by-step alterations. in the above illustrations. organisational planned alteration in response to societal tendency. the fast nutrient franchise’ reactions to the CSPI ( Center for Science in the Public Interest ) case so can be defined as “unplanned change” . Harmonizing to Coombs ( 1999. p. 2 ) . organisational crisis is “an event that is an unpredictable. major menace that can hold a negative consequence on the organisation. industry. or stakeholders if handled improperly. ” In other words. crisis is unplanned alteration that can sway an organisation and all the people associated with it.

In response to this case. on December 15 2010. McDonald’s posted on its web site a Response to CSPI Lawsuit:

We are proud of our Happy Meals and intend to smartly support our trade name. our repute and our nutrient. We stand on our 30 old ages track record of supplying a fun experience for childs and households at McDonald’s. We listen to our clients. and parents systematically tell us they approve of our Happy Meals. We are confident that parents understand and appreciate that Happy Meals are a fun dainty. with quality. right-sized nutrient picks for their kids that can suit into a balanced diet. ( Bridget. 2010 )

Subsequently on. McDonald’s made it clear that the fast nutrient concatenation had begun to do alterations to the composing of Happy Meals in response to parental and consumer force per unit area. It besides pledged to cut down the Na content in all of its nutrients by 15 per centum. with the exclusions of sodium carbonate and sweets. Furthermore. it set a deadline of 2015 for restricting salt. and said that it would pass the remainder of this decennary cutting back on sugars. saturated fats and Calories and doing accommodations to part sizes. The new Happy Meals were introduced in September and launched across the company’s 14. 000 eating houses on April 2012.

They would all include apple pieces. but in a smaller sum of three to five pieces than the current eight to 10 offered as an option ( Stephanie. 2011 ) . McDonald’s will besides offer a nonfat cocoa milk option. along with the option of low-fat milk or the traditional sodium carbonate. The monetary value is non expected to alter ( Andrew. 2011 ) . Furthermore. as portion of an attempt to supply better entree to nutritionary information about its nutrients. McDonald’s developed its first nomadic application for the populace. Additionally. in 2011. McDonald’s executives toured the state to hear straight from consumers about their concerns ( Alex. 2011 ) . In the following portion. we would wish to offer our ratings. pros and cons. of McDonald’s schemes and tactics in managing the crisis.

& lt ; III & gt ; Evaluation

As we could image. the gross revenues of Happy Meals have been a big parts to McDonald’s day-to-day gross. Therefore. if McDonald’s had lost the case. the company would hold faced a truly immense lost on its entire net incomes and taken serious harm on its repute. On the side of the organisation alteration. we believe that McDonald’s did rather good in the face of the crisis. Organization crisis could be divided into three phases: pre-crisis. crisis. and post-crisis ( Miler. 2012. p187 ) .

In the pre-crisis phase. an organisation should protect or forestall possible jobs. It should do employees hold a sort of consciousness of crisis all the clip. Indeed. McDonald’s has ever been accused of selling unhealthy. oily nutrient to grownups. and working kids through advertisement since 1960s ( Cohen. 2009. p8-6 ) . As a taking company in fast nutrient industry. inauspicious promotion ever be the major job for McDonald’s. Still. McDonald’s couldn’t find a manner to work out this job at all. It is necessary that a company grow with self-awareness against any job. After all. McDonald’s had got unfavourable promotion in this event what had happened earlier.

During the crisis phase. it is really of import that the company should do correct and wise determinations in order to salve the damaged repute. As we said earlier. on one side. McDonald’s projected itself as a company which was proud of its merchandises and would smartly support its repute in order to quiet down concerned clients. On the other side. McDonald’s announced that it would cut down the part of Gallic french friess in every Happy Meal by half and replace them with apple pieces. It even promised to get down functioning healthier nutrient in the new Happy Meal to run into the nutrition criterions. Indeed. McDonald’s made really speedy response to this event. and they besides pointed out that parents could ever take non to purchase happy repasts for their childs alternatively of knocking the corporation’s selling schemes. After doing the alterations. McDonald’s operation was non impacted excessively much.

Last. in the post-crisis phase. company should take lessons from this and set up backup programs for similar crisis which may go on in the hereafter. Apparently. even after the crisis. Happy Meal was non banned. Furthermore. it has become a immense hit for McDonald’s and even made the company one of the world’s largest plaything distributers. As a consequence. more and more companies wanted to corporate with McDonald’s.

For illustration. many life movie companies wanted to team up with McDonald’s in order to take advantage of this fast nutrient franchise’ immense market influence in advancing their films. In amount. with its accomplishments fleshy shortcoming. McDonald’s had a good grip on the whole crisis. Nevertheless. even the crisis had passed. this taking fast nutrient concatenation suffered from public unfavorable judgment sing its merchandises. In the hereafter. we believe that McDonald’s should develop an effectual scheme to assist better its trade name image and a better hazard direction methodological analysis to assist extenuating coming crisis.

In the following portion of the paper. we want to offer our recommendation to assist McDonald’s better managing similar state of affairs. Besides. since we overall felt that McDonald’s managed the crisis highly good. we would wish to urge its schemes to be implemented to Jack in the Box. which faced a similar state of affairs to McDonald’s. However. unlike McDonald’s which smartly fight for the continuance of its utilizing playthings to force Happy Meal gross revenues. Jack in the Box decided to drop playthings in its Happy Meal when it was faced with the force per unit area from the populace. We believe McDonald’s execution of strategic alterations could hold helped Jack in the Box to set toys back to its Happy Meal.

& lt ; IV & gt ; Recommendation and Implementation

Recommendation for McDonald’s

Obviously. McDonald’s managed the crisis truly good. In fact. the nutrition of Happy Meal was improved as the Calories were reduced well. Because the case was dismissed. McDonald’s continued sell Happy Meal with playthings. In the terminal. McDonald’s didn’t have to alter its children’s influence scheme. Even though McDonald’s made its Happy Meal healthier. we believe that their alterations to the repast could be bigger. such as alteration the cheeseburger to a healthier Burger with vegetable interior and do lily-livered nuggets with existent poulets alternatively of minced meat. Besides. McDonald’s could cut down the attractive force to kids or alter a different manner. For illustration. the fast nutrient concatenation could plan an advertizement to recommend kids to eat healthy. such as drink milk and eat fruit. Furthermore. McDonald’s could optimise the influence facet. For case. McDonald’s could utilize influence scheme to promote more people to make charity and educate kids to eat healthy and exercising often.

Recommendation for Jack in the Box

In 2011. under heavy public’s unfavorable judgment. Jack in the Box decided to halt giving out free playthings with the purchases of Happy Meal. Obviously. the graduated table of the crisis faced by Jack in the Box was much smaller than that faced by McDonald’s. However. we felt that Jack in the Box could profit greatly by larning from McDonald’s manner of managing its crisis. We besides have some recommendations for Jack in the Box based on the successful influence scheme of McDonald’s. Harmonizing to the study. McDonald’s Happy Meal accounted for about 10 per centum of the chain’s U. S. gross revenues in 2010. The gross revenues of McDonald’s Happy Meals entirely were more than Jack in the Box’s entire gross revenues ( Maureen. 2011 ) .

This fact showed us that the influence scheme used by McDonald’s was highly effectual. A spokesman of Jack in the Box said that the franchise’s mark clients were “the frequent fast nutrient consumer” or grownups from 18 to 34. Therefore. we recommend Jack in the Box to utilize the same influence scheme to their mark client. The fast nutrient concatenation could besides utilize emotion and/or insinuation influence to pull clients. For illustration. Jack in the Box could plan on-line games for grownups who gained entree to the games with free codifications offered with purchases of Happy Meals. Furthermore. the company could plan a price reduction card for the clients who accumulate a certain amount of ingestion.

Unlike McDonald’s which smartly fight so that it could go on utilizing playthings to advance Happy Meal. Jack in the Box decided to drop playthings in its Happy Meal when it was faced with the similar force per unit area from the populace. We believed that many of the McDonald’s organisational alterations could be copied and use in Jack in the Box. This would let Jack in the Box to go on selling its Happy Meal with playthings. For illustration. Jack in the Box could alter the composing of Happy Meal toward a more fitter trends—such as cut downing the Na content. sugars. saturated fats. and Calories to its nutrients ; including veggies and fruits in the bill of fare ; and offering tea. juice. and milk as options to the traditional sodium carbonate drinks. Jack in the Box besides needed to allow its clients know of its committedness in doing its merchandises healthier.

The ground provided by Jack in the Box sing its allowing spell of Happy Meal’s plaything was that it waned the Happy Meal to appeal to parents. Brian Luscomb. Jack in the Box’s spokesman. commented: “Rather than advance a plaything we’ve focused on the quality of merchandises in our Kid’s Meals. like a broiled cheese sandwich on sourdough. grilled or crispy chicken strips. or a beefburger. We believe that supplying these sorts of options is more appealing to a parent than boxing a plaything with lower-quality fare” ( Bernstein. 2011 ) .

However. we believed that Jack in the Box could profit greatly from spread outing its Happy Meal’s mark market to include kids. To accomplish this. Jack in the Box would necessitate to ease strategic change–”the procedure of explicating. implementing. and measuring determinations that enable an organisation to accomplish its objectives” ( Wong. Organizational alteration. 2012 ) . In this instance. the strategic program would include extended merchandises invention. For illustration. Jack in the Box could utilize popular playthings and on-line games to pull kids to its Happy Meal. The Burger franchise concatenation could besides construct resort areas inside its shops. This offered kids with merriment and healthy exercisings.

Execution for Jack in the Box

As we discussed supra. Jack in the Box could pull on McDonald’s successful tactics to appeal more clients to devour their merchandises. We found McDonald’s influence maneuver could be successfully implemented on Jack in the Box due to two chief grounds.

The first ground is the industry similarity. Jack in the Box is one of the nation’s largest beefburger ironss with more than 2. 200 eating houses in 19 provinces. Besides. merely like McDonald’s. Jack in the Box is besides a member of the fast nutrient beefburger eating house ( FFHR ) industry. This is an industry characterized by high fight and hazard. Although Jack in the Box is concentrated on the West Coast–primarily in California. the competition is still intensive. In this industry. McDonald’s is the lone fast nutrient concatenation to busy about 13 per centum of the US market ( McDonald’s Report. 2010 ) . There is no ground that Jack in the Box could non profit from larning from the market leader. McDonald’s.

The 2nd ground is the easy-to-influence mark clients. As we mentioned before. Jack in the Box’s mark consumer are youth. aged 18 to 34. This group of client is the most active portion. They are independent purchasers. This means that they could take the thing they want without inquiring their parents’ permission or admittance. Another character of this client group is economic dependant. This group of client typically has incomes and besides can take charge of their money. The state of affairs is much better than McDonald’s kids market.

Besides. this group client of Jack in the Box likes maintaining gait with the tendency. We think if Jack in the Box could utilize the influence tactic cater to its mark consumers. they could farther spread out their market portion in the hereafter. However. in implementing aggressive selling schemes. Jack in the Box would surely be criticized by the populace. Still. we believed that if Jack in the Box continues doing its Happy Meal healthier and back uping the surrounding community through assorted charity activities–such as donating portion of its Happy Meal’s net income to kids infirmaries. giving free Happy Meals to the homeless. and so forth– . it can bask increase net income and at the same clip keep good public image.

Mention:

Alex. M. ( July 26. 2011 ) . McDonald’s Happy Meal to include chopped apples. less french friess. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. christianpost. com/news/mcdonalds-happy-meal-to-include-sliced-apples-52867/ # gKDYWvXCIJGSO8g1. 99

Andrew. L. ( July 28. 2011 ) . McDonald’s adds apple pieces. reaction to Happy
Meal case? Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //chicagopersonalinjurylegalblog. com/2011/07/mcdonalds-adds-apple-slices-reaction-to-happy-meal-lawsuit. hypertext markup language

Bernstein. S. ( 2011. June 20 ) . Jack in the Box stops including playthings in kids’ repasts [ updated ] . Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //latimesblogs. latimes. com/money_co/2011/06/jack-in-the-box-toys. hypertext markup language

Bridget. C. ( December 15. 2010 ) . Response to CSPI Lawsuit. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. aboutmcdonalds. com/mcd/newsroom/mcdonalds_statements_and_alerts/response_to_cpi_lawsuit. hypertext markup language

Centers for disease control and bar: Childhood fleshiness facts. ( 2012. June 07 ) . Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. gov/healthyyouth/obesity/facts. htm

Cohen. I. ( 2009 ) . McDonald’s and its critics. 1973-2009.

Dan. L. ( 2011. April 19 ) . McDonald’s faces at Happy Meal case. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. reuters. com/article/2011/04/19/us-mcdonalds-lawsuit-idUSTRE73I4P820110419

Harris. J. . Schwartz. M. . & A ; Brownell. K. ( 2010 ) . Fast nutrient FACTS: measuring fast nutrient nutrition and selling to youth. Research study. Yale Rudd Center For Food Policy and Obesity. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. fastfoodmarketing. org/media/FastFoodFACTS_Report. pdf

Joanne. R. . & A ; Caroline. B. ( 2006 ) . Corporate Identity and Strategic Change: The Case of McDonald’s

Miller. K. ( 2012 ) . Organizational Communication: Approachs and Processes. 6th erectile dysfunction. Boston: Wadsworth.

Molland. J. ( 2010. December 15 ) . California ma Sues McDonalds over Happy Meal. Retrieved from
hypertext transfer protocol: //www. care2. com/causes/california-mom-sues-mcdonalds-over-happy-meals-video. hypertext markup language

Stephanie. S. ( July 26. 2011 ) . McDonald’s trims its Happy Meal. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. nytimes. com/2011/07/27/business/mcdonalds-happy-meal-to-get-healthier. hypertext markup language? _r=0