Money In Sports Essay, Research Paper

In the article George J. Bryjak voices his sentiments of athleticss squad proprietors utilizing taxpayers & # 8217 ; money to construct new bowl and sphere. One of his first statements is a bold accusal of professional athleticss being unfair in its agencies to fund a athletics bowl or sphere. He says & # 8220 ; If there is one invariable in professional athleticss in the last 20-25 old ages, it is that proprietors and participants are going progressively affluent at the disbursal of fans, non-fans, and taxpayers. & # 8221 ; Bryjak ( 67 ) . The remained of the article the writer uses many illustrations in recent history to endorse up his sentiment. For case, with the latest telecasting contract signed by the NFL, each squad receives 70 million dollars, none of which will travel to a new bowl or to take downing ticket monetary values. All that money goes to the participants & # 8217 ; and proprietors & # 8217 ; wages. With the telecasting corporations paying such a big amount of money for the contract, the advertizers of the state will be paying more for advertisement on telecasting. Ultimately taking to raising of monetary values of soft drinks, beer, autos, tyres, and an mixture of other merchandises and services. By the terminal of the article the writer makes it rather clear that America is paying more for athleticss squads so merely the ticket monetary value. The writer creates some credibleness, every bit good as emotion entreaty, throughout the article by utilizing statistics and good thought out illustrations. In one subdivision he states & # 8221 ; featuring events do non bring forth new income every bit much as they represent a transportation of bing money within the concern community. & # 8221 ; He presents himself as a individual concerned with the fiscal well being of hello

s audience, by making so he forms trust. An illustration of this us-verse-them sort of subject is found when the writer negotiations about luxury box seats. He states, “The norm working individual is asked to set a revenue enhancement on their place, or pay gross revenues revenue enhancement or some other consumer revenue enhancement to construct luxury boxes in which they can non afford to sit.” It’s statements like this that appeal to the emotions of his audience.

The writer takes a base on the issue of public fiscal support of professional athleticss squads by stating, & # 8220 ; Too much money is spent on athleticss squads by the populace environing the team. & # 8221 ; His claim is that the populace is acquiring stuck with the measure for new bowls, because participants & # 8217 ; wages and ticket monetary values are being raised. He gives grounds of this in his statement about taxpayers paying for a bowl they might non of all time sit in. He states, & # 8220 ; Peoples who don & # 8217 ; t know the difference between a first down and a field end ( and couldn & # 8217 ; t care less ) will be paying portion of this multi-billion-dollar check & # 8221 ; Even though the writer gives a good statement to his claim, he does perpetrate a headlong generalisation false belief. He says, & # 8220 ; Buffalo Bills proprietor Ralph Wilson and Philadelphia Eagles proprietor Norman Braman paid themselves wages of $ 3,490,000 and $ 7,500,000, respectfully in the accounting logic of at least some NFL proprietors, ego paid & # 8220 ; wages & # 8221 ; are an expense. & # 8221 ; This statement makes the audience believe that there are more proprietors in the NFL paying themselves hideous sums of money, and merely composing it off as an disbursal. I felt the article was enlightening and good written. And I would wish to read more about this sort of subject in your magazine.