Moral Differences Essay, Research Paper
How to cover with moral differences. ( 4 ways )
The first manner is to believe there are no morally right or incorrect point of views. The
moral issue is merely a cultural game and neither your sentiments or mine affairs.
Therefore there is no right or incorrect. This position is called moral nihilism.
Related to this thought is moral incredulity, which holds that we can? t know any
moral truths, and moral subjectivism, which holds that moral positions are
simply interior provinces in a individual and that they can? t be compared to the inner
provinces of another individual. However believing in the above solves no jobs,
if cipher is right and cipher is incorrect.
The 2nd manner is to believe that there is no cosmopolitan truth, that each civilization
has its ain set of regulations that are valid and use to that civilization, they don? T
interfere with our regulations and we don? T interfere with theirs, this is called ethical
relativism. This belief is viewed as an attitude of tolerance. This belief solves
struggles in the thought that whatever the bulk deems to be the moral regulation is
the regulation to follow.
The 3rd belief is that deep down in malice of all the civilizations differences we name
all still agree on a certain moral rudimentss, that people everyplace have fundamentally
the same human nature but that we merely accommodate it into our environment, this
thought is called Soft Universalism. Universalism because it perceives that there
are some cosmopolitan moral regulations ; soft because it is non every bit extremist as difficult
universalism. This belief can work out jobs because its chief end is to seek
common land beneath the assortment of sentiments and minute
RESs.
The 4th belief is called difficult universalism, this is the absolute antonym of
moral nihilism saying that there is merely one cosmopolitan moral codification. This belief
solves jobs with difficult grounds and ground.
Problems with Ethical Relativism:
( 1 ) No Criticism or Praise of Other Cultures, we need to knock or praise other
civilizations ethical motives to keep our ain moral unity.
( 2 ) Majority Rule, the thought of the bulk ever being right is merely non rational.
( 3 ) Professed or Actual Morality? this is the thought that a certain sort of behaviour is
normal, but what is? normal? ? for illustration when a group was asked about
unfaithfulness the bulk was against it but when the same group was asked if they
had committed it, the bulk had.
( 4 ) What is a Majority? In the case of mercy killing if a jurisprudence is passed tomorrow
the bulk would believe it was morally right, nevertheless merely a hebdomad ago it was
morally incorrect, and possibly in a twelvemonth it will be considered incorrect once more by the
bulk. Therefore the bulk is in a manner inconsistent.
( 5 ) What is a Culture? there is nil that determines what a civilization is if we
Don? T know what the norm is within a civilization if we don? t even cognize what the
civilization is.
( 6 ) Can Tolerance Be a Universal Value? If all values are culture- comparative so
tolerance is besides culture- relation, hence merely because tolerance is good for us
what makes it good for other civilizations.
Three Universal Values
1 ) A policy of caring for adequate babies to guarantee the continuance of the group.
2 ) A regulation against lying.
3 ) A regulation against slaying.
