Morality In Humans Essay, Research Paper

Morality ; The Pre-existing and Universal Code

Morality: A philosophy or system of moral behavior ; peculiar moral rules or

regulation of behavior.

To state that modern morality consists in accepting the criterion of one? s age is to

suggest that human morality alterations with the passing of clip. This statement is merely

unacceptable. Morality is non something of a craze. It should non travel through tendencies like

apparels or popular music, morality is the foundation in which our society is embedded in,

a foundation from which human values and criterions derive from. If we are to hold that

these values and criterions are flexible within the boundaries of clip, and that they contain

within them no land rooted infrastructure in society, so there is no manner in

separating the difference between right and incorrect. Morality is what identifies the

rules in which adult male exists, to seperate good from bad, and right from incorrect, and

every society should endeavor to detect and accomplish these principals. Morality should non

alteration over clip even though civilizations and societal stratifications do, what was morally

right three thousand old ages ago is morally right today and should be morally right three

thousand old ages from now. Merely with cosmopolitan rules can we as corporate society

detect what is right, what is incorrect, and what is best, hence there exists non modern

morality but merely morality.

An empirical philosopher, W.T. Stace, argues that if we believe all ethical motives are

culturally comparative, it is impossible for us to judge what is best. Although acknowledging he

does non cognize what is best, he concludes that it is the duty of adult male to detect

what is. He does non challenge that moral imposts and moral thoughts differ from state to

state and from age to age, but that the fact that one civilization thinks something is right

does non needfully do it right merely every bit much as what we believe is incorrect in our civilization

does non needfully intend it is incorrect.

? The fact that the Greeks or the dwellers of New Guinea think something

right does non do it right, even for them. Nor does the fact that we think the same

things incorrect make them incorrect. They are in themselves either right or incorrect.

What we have to make is detect what they are. ? 1

The clangs in civilizations between difference of morality does non intend that ethical motives

are comparative, all that it means is that unidentified civilizations and their beliefs remain nescient

to the truth. However at the same clip we recognize this, we must be careful non to

commit to our ain moral codification as the merely 1. The lone truth that we can be certain of is

that there is one universal and moral codification, and although we may non hold found it, we

must swear that it is amongst us and that through our experience and continual growth

cognition, that we will come to it. This is non even to state that there is one civilization within

society today that defines the true moral codification, for what we know no civilization contains this.

However as clip passes we build upon our cognition of truth in hunt for other truths

that strengthen and farther set up our already turning understanding of what is right

and incorrect and by making this we can detect certain values and beliefs from civilizations that

are so merely and right.

Of class by proposing that there is the 1 cosmopolitan moral codification, one would hold

to support this by besides connoting that there is a superior power that imposes this codification

amongst us. To take the place of ethical tyranny would be rather hard to accomplish

without the mention of God.

? There would be no point, for the naif truster in the religion, in the philosopher? s

inquiries sing the foundations of morality and the footing of moral duty & # 8230 ;

For the true truster the writer of the moral jurisprudence is God. What pleases God, what God

commands- that is the definition of right. ? 2

Our civilisation today is profoundly rooted in Christianity. The Bel

ief in God is really

popular within our society. Equally much as we may seek to get away Christianity, it still remains

with us, ? The moral thoughts even of those who most violently reject the tenet of

Christian religion with their minds are still Christian thoughts. ? 3 To believe or to accept the thought

of one moral codification, one must believe that there is a God or a group of elect God? s who

imposed this codification upon us. So there is, for most Christians, one individual God, that regulations

over the full existence, and his wants are inked in the bible. Unfortunately, God? s

wants are consistent around the Earth, and clip and age is of no significance. If some

cultural group lives in incredulity of God so they merely live in ignorance of him, and it is

to their effect that they are deprived. However so, since it is rather apparent that

popular modern civilisation believes in God, it is hence sensible to presume that with

this belief we accept God as the one superior swayer of the existence, like any other

autocratic swayer.

If we are faithful to God we can presume that as our leader, he has given us regulations

and ordinances to follow, and obey. Do any of the great leaders, yesteryear and nowadays, leave

the people who follow them with no way, counsel, or direction? Of class non.

All leaders held their place because they were instrumental in this country. God is no

different. God has non left us without way, he has delivered to us a preexisting order

that applies to all ages. An order in which he lays the foundation in which adult male is to

follow, an order that if followed will present to every civilization on earth way and a end.

To alter this preexisting moral codification of world as clip passes leaves the human race

with no order. It would merely be impossible to state what is right and what is incorrect.

What would be the evidences to bespeak it? How could anyone warrant their actions without

the grounds that it was the best action? God, the adjudicator of all our destinies, decides what

is good and what is bad. Killing in about all parts of the universe is considered an immoral

action. If God determines that killing is unacceptable, so irrespective of what a certain

civilizations beliefs are, their ethical motives and those beliefs are incorrect, and unpermisable. However

if it so happens that we have misinterpreted the sermon of God, and violent death is

acceptable, so the popular sentiment on this affair is incorrect. The point is that one of

these ethical motives is right and one is incorrect. It is unacceptable to state that because one society

is inferior to another, or differs in ways of another, than it is so acceptable for all

civilizations to move in conformity with their ignorance and partake in unfair action.

To state modern morality consists in accepting the criterion of one? s age is to

suggest that adult male is incapable ( or possibly excessively faineant ) in happening the truth. If we are to

accept the huge differences in ethical motives and moralss in the universe as a good criterion to

society we so accept that there is no right and incorrect, and therefore there is no action that is

best, and no action that can be justified. We must recognize certain values and beliefs that

are nescient to those bids of God. Part of adult male? s mission is detecting the

preexisting and cosmopolitan codification that God intends for us to determine. This was the really

ground Jesus was sent to us about 2000 old ages ago, and it will be the same ground for his

return, to assist transfuse those ethical motives, values, and rules. And when he returns the moral

criterion he will prophesy will non alter because of the passing of clip. He will prophesy the

same codification he did originally. A preexisting, cosmopolitan moral codification that will function as a

foundation for adult male to construct upon, a foundation where all work forces and adult females, while still being

able to keep there civilization and individuality, will be able to populate by the same rules, and

ethical motives as everyone else, a foundation where everyone knows what is right, what is incorrect,

and what is best.

& # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8212 ; & # 8211 ;