Morality Vs. Immorality Essay, Research Paper

Every individual on this planet is alone in some manner. We all have ways to place ourselves from the multitudes. For some people it s a endowment that they possess, for others they manner they dress. Some people define themselves by wealth and power whereas others tend to utilize their ethical motives and or spiritual beliefs. In A Man For All Seasons ( Robert Frost ) Sir Tomas More is merely such a individual. Tomas More is the Chancellor of the Exchequer for King Henry VIII and is a really spiritual adult male. Early in the drama it becomes clear that the drama will go around around More and his ethical motives. We learn the male monarch Henry VIII plans to disassociate his brother s widow Queen Catherine because she will non bear him a boy. Things become complicated when Henry finds that the Catholic Pope will non allow him a divorce. Henry decides that he will disassociate the church and get down his ain, the Church of England where he can be the supreme leader, a God on Earth of kinds.

Sir Tomas More gets up at the cleft of morning every forenoon and prays. He goes to church on a regular footing and he sometimes even skips whole yearss so he can merely pray. He is loyal to the Catholic Church about fanatically. Yet More is non merely another bible clump imbecile who preaches to everyone. Not merely is he the Chancellor of the Exchequer to the male monarch but besides a good known attorney, writer, and nobleman. He is evidently a really intelligent adult male, but so why does he compromise the safety of his household by non cursing his commitment to the male monarch and acknowledging him as the supreme power in the Church of England. His ethical motives and moralss dictate that he must remain true to the Catholic Church. It is his belief that there can merely be one God, one supreme swayer and that is the Catholic God.

But truly how moral is this? What he is fundamentally making is seting his life and his household s life in danger. He is traveling straight against the will of he king. Not really many people went against the will of the male monarch and got off with it. And it s non merely his life on the line but his societal standing and economic state of affairs every bit good. I admire his resoluteness but were I him I would believe a small harder on it because as the bets get higher it becomes clear that More will hold to cleaving to his ethical motives at the cost of his occupation and his relationship with his household. He ends up vacating from his station as Chancellor of the Exchequer. As a consequence his married woman, Alice, becomes progressively cranky due to the fact that as a consequence of More clinging to his ethical motives she has to populate in a smaller, less than gargant

uan house and besides that they don Ts have any amahs or pantrymans to wait on their every caprice. They merely have less money and power and that truly bothers her. More so than More who is the 1 who held the place. Even his girl, Meg, becomes cross with him. However this seems to stem from the fact that she merely can t understand why he is doing the picks that he is. I can sympathise with non understanding his idea procedure here. It looks like he is destructing his aureate chance at success for nil at all. Not merely throwing success off but jeopardizing them every bit good. This is a sensible choler, nevertheless, Alice s choler stems for greed and merely looks selfish to me. Yes they don Ts have a batch of money. Yes they aren t as powerful. Yes they don Ts have amahs or a large house. But they do hold three repasts a twenty-four hours and they do hold each other and they do hold a house to populate in. These are the things you need in life and they have them. More is content and his whole household should be excessively.

More was true to his moralss to the really terminal. That is something that I don t think a batch of people can make these yearss. Peoples are looking so difficult to be successful in our epoch that frequently times I see people who change their beliefs merely so they can suit in or derive in some manner. If you were to inquire person if they would of all time sell out they would likely state no ; this includes me but when you think about being put to decease for something you believe in so the whole state of affairs changes a batch. I don t think I believe in anything adequate to justify me deceasing for it. So in that facet, I admire Sir Tomas More. But in the procedure of lodging to his ethical motives he truly ache his household. For that I do non look up to him. Were Sir Tomas Mores actions moral and ethical at all times? That is a inquiry that I can truly merely reply for myself. Everyone has different thoughts of how things should be done based on their ain moral codification. I feel assorted on the issue but the cat sitting to my left may believe that what he did was right on in all facets while the cat on my right might believe that what he did was wholly incorrect. It is so of import to follow you bosom and to make what you think is right. If you don t so people will see that and force you about. You have to be independent and believe for yourself. The wagess for this are huge. But you won Ts cognize how so until you experience them for yourself Obviously Tomas More agreed with on this topic. But in my book, household comes foremost so his actions were more immoral than moral.

335