President Obama is seeking to convert the United States that was a whole we set each other apart as a state. He tries to indicate out different issues in American and explains new thoughts to do the United States better as a strong authorities. A. Supporting Argument: President Obama addresses the calamity in Tucson by stating because of this calamity it made the state focal point less on the public argument and reminded us how of import we as a whole are and non so much on our personal positions and penchant. 1. Evidence: “But there’s a ground the calamity in Tucson gave us intermission. Amid all the noise and passion and resentment of our public argument. Tucson reminded us that no affair who we are or where we come from. each of us is a portion of something greater-something more eventful than party or political penchant “ 2. Claim: Obama says amid all the noise and passion of our public argument. While he is turn toing this calamity he is saying at the terminal of the twenty-four hours no affair where you come from or who you are. we each make a portion of our authorities no affair what you prefer. 3. Connection: Obama uses an emotional trigger in his statement to seek and convey his intent.
B. Supporting Argument: President Obama encourages a common program with America and inquiring Congress to fall in and extinguish the one million millions of dollars that taxpayers are paying to oil companies. 1. Evidence: “We need to acquire behind this invention. And to assist pay for it. I’m inquiring Congress to extinguish the one million millions in taxpayer dollars we presently give to oil companies. ( Applause ) I don’t know if- I don’t cognize if you’ve noticed. but they’re making merely ticket on their ain. ( Laughter. ) So alternatively of subsidising yesterday’s energy. let’s invest in tomorrows” . 2. Claim: Obama applies the word “we” in his address but he is really stating “I and the Congress” . He is seeking to salvage money for the taxpayers but he needs the Congress aid to make so. 3. Connection: Obama uses equivocal linguistic communication towards the Congress. Congress would be up for a challenge and would hold no pick but to extinguish the one million millions of dollars that taxpayers would hold to pay to oil companies. C. Supporting Argument: Obama states that Race to the Top was the best betterment for public schools in a coevals. He besides said that this thought was created by the Republicans and Democratic and if they continue this attack. Race to the Top can replace No Child Left Behind jurisprudence that former President Bush created.
1. Evidence: “Race to the Top is the most meaningful reform of our public schools in a coevals. For less than 1 per centum of what we spend on instruction each twelvemonth. it has led over 40 provinces to raise their criterions for instruction and acquisition. And those criterions were developed. by the manner. non by Washington. but by the Republican and Democratic governors throughout the state. And Race to the Top should be the attack we follow this twelvemonth as we replace No Child Left Behind with a jurisprudence that’s more flexible and focused on what’s best for our childs. ( Applause. ) ” 2. Claim: Obama states that Race to the Top was non merely created by the Democratic governors but besides by the Republicans. He is seeking to convey the republicans to hold his new attack to reform public schools and replace No Child Left Behind that former President Bush made. He is seeking to convert President Bush former protagonists to hold with his thought and derive their support. 3. Connection: Obama uses mistakes of skip because by him saying that he wants to replace No Child Left Behind. he disapproves what President Bush thought was but he doesn’t outright state it. It’s a personal onslaught against Bush.
