Questions to be Graded Essay

Free Articles

1. The research workers analyzed the information they collected as though it were at what degree of measuring?

a. Nominal
b. Ordinal
c. Interval/ratio
d. Experimental
Answer: c. Interval/ratio



We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

2. What was the average posttest authorization mark for the control group? Answer: 97. 12

3. Compare the average baseline and posttest depression tonss of the experimental group. Was this an expected determination? Supply a principle for your reply. Answer: The average baseline depression mark is 14. 00 and the posttest is 13. 36 with a difference of 0. 64. There is a little sum of depression after the tools they were utilizing and research was completed but was non plenty of a difference to do an impact determination sing if the schemes were genuinely effectual. Patients were less down after the research.

4. Compare the average baseline and posttest depression tonss of the control group. Make these tonss strengthen or weaken the cogency of the research consequences? Supply a principle for your reply. Answer: It was found that the baseline and posttest for depression of the control group remained the same at 10. 4 and these tonss strengthen the cogency because merely the experimental group showed a positive alteration in this experiment.

5. Which group’s trial tonss had the least sum of variableness or scattering? Supply a principle for your reply. Answer: The group with the least sum of variableness was the experimental groups post prove authorization mark because it showed the least sum of scattering. The experimental groups SD station trial mark was merely 7. 28.

6. Make the authorization variable or self-care self-efficacy variable demonstrate the greatest sum of scattering? Supply a principle for your reply. Answer: The group with the greatest sum of scattering was the self-care self-efficacy variable group with a baseline SD of 14. 88. The authorization baselines consequence was 9. 19. For the station trial. the self-care self-efficacy SD was 13. 55 and the authorizations SD was 7. 28.

7. The mean ( ) is a step of CENTRAL TENDENCY of a distribution while the SD is a step of DISPERSION of its tonss. Both and SD are DESCRIPTIVE statistics.

8. What was the average badness for nephritic disease for the research subjects? What was the scattering or variableness of the nephritic disease badness tonss? Did the badness scores vary significantly between the control and the experimental groups? Is this of import? Supply a principle for your reply. Answer: The research sample consisted of 50 haemodialysis patients and the average badness for nephritic disease was found to be 6. 74. The scattering of the disease badness mark was 2. 97.

The badness scores did vary. and the survey consequences province that there was a important difference in the betterment of authorization schemes than with the control group patients. and the consequences suggest that authorization techniques might hold an of import function for patients in self direction of terminal phase nephritic disease. The survey suggested that supplying patients with instruction in empowerment intercessions will positively impact an terminal phase nephritic disease patient’s result and hopefully maximise their well being and wellness.

9. Which variable was to the lowest degree affected by the authorization plan? Supply a principle for your reply. Answer: The depression variable was found to be least affected by this empowerment plan because it showed the largest differences from the baseline to posttest with a mark of 0. 64 lessenings.

10. Be it of import for the research workers to include the entire agencies and SDs for the survey variables in Table 2 to advance the readers’ apprehension of the survey consequences? Supply a principle for your reply. Answer: It was of import for the research workers to include the entire agencies and the standard divergences in the survey variable tabular array. It genuinely did give a good ocular to viewing audiences like myself and helped me better understand the consequences of the survey. It was able to clearly demo which groups had the most additions every bit good as lessenings in this survey.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

x

Hi!
I'm Katy

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out