Exile or even exclusion has shown to hold deep effects on a individual. It can interrupt you down from the individual you one time strived to be. or it can do you into a more enriched individual. In Shakespeare’s King Lear. the character. Kent. went through an expatriate that caused his character to hold a potent and enriching experience. His experience alienated him from the relationship he and the male monarch one time shared. but finally led to him allowing out his feelings to an unsuspicious chap. making a closer relationship with his darling male monarch. and even linking him to the beloved Lear’s adored Cordelia. During the clip in which Kent was exiled. he was excluded from the award of being a Lord. He was less respected than earlier. and estranged from the rubric and life he one time held. However. through this chance. Kent was able to ‘vent’ out some feelings he held over another adult male. His camouflage allowed him to keep more power than he had before as Kent erupted with a batch of infuriation he held against the character Oswald.

He skewered the aghast Oswald with a calumniatory lingua. and was empowered by the expatriate that allotted his camouflage and release of choler. This peculiar scene emphasizes how those who seem to keep the least influence really keep farther domination. This relates to other characters as good. such as the Fool. Among the juncture that Kent went undercover ; the male monarch was unable to acknowledge him. Some might believe this tragic because Kent seemed terribly fond of Lear. However. this experience was basically auxiliary to the relationship between Kent and the King. Lear appeared to swear the cloaked Kent more than the 1 he could acknowledge from his yesteryear. and the connexion between the both held a stronger bond than earlier. His expatriate one time once more has enriched the ‘unfortunate’ Kent. associating in the subject that actual sightlessness holds more sight than when we are able sing the universe through our natural vision. Not merely did the ostracism of Kent lead him to a connexion with the King. but it led him to come closer to another banished victim: Cordelia.

Both suffered from the thankless wrath of Lear. and that cardinal unlocked a new universe for both the exiled peoples. Although Kent was in camouflage within Cordelia’s cantonment. she was still able to acknowledge her father’s comrade and ally. The relation between the two became undeniable by that point. and it stressed the subject that innocently expelled victims of Shakespeare’s work were the 1s who could see the factual truth. Although the ejection of Kent from the land was encrusted with the air of being unfortunate. it turned about and became one of the more enhancing chances of his life. It opened up new doors and allowed him to let go of emotion. bond with his King. and connect with the darling Cordelia. His experience strengthened him and the subjects and elements of Shakespeare’s enrapturing King Lear.