During the period of 1760-1850. Great Britain experienced a phenomenon that earned it the rubric “the workshop of the world” . It was an incident characterized by the rise of machine-powered mills. technological progresss. an addition in population with a diminution of agricultural population. and the enlargement of trade. These are the features of the Industrial Revolution. defined by Arnold Toynbee to be the “substitution of competition for the medieval regulation” . Adam Smith envisioned it to be an economic system free of authorities intervention. driven by forces of competition and the nature of human greed.

Smith’s thoughts were published in the book The Wealth of Nations. and these thoughts manifested to bring forth the features seen by the Industrial Revolution. Therefore. it is implied. if non evident. that one of the causes that led to the rise of the Industrial Revolution of 1760-1850 was the manifestation of the thoughts Smith put away to accomplish wealth and productiveness for a state. The procedure of industrialisation. nevertheless. resulted societal impacts that concern the criterion of life of the on the job category.

Oppositions to the Industrial Revolution. dubbed “pessimists” . experience that “the effects of the Industrial Revolution prove that free competition may bring forth wealth without bring forthing well-being” . On the contrary. advocates back uping the procedure of industrialisation and the debut of the mill system. dubbed “optimists” . claim that the criterion of life. or the quality of life. of the working category really improved throughout the Industrial Revolution full initial period.

Did the Industrial Revolution rise or lower the criterion of life of the societal working category? These two different point of views clang when efforts are made to reply the predating inquiry. However. upon analyzing statistical grounds. I contend that life criterions of workers did better throughout the continuance of the Industrial Revolution. or at least there was no impairment of their quality of life. The ground for clashing of point of views prevarications in the different manner each group defines the phrase “standard of life. ” Its definition is defined consequently below.

Harmonizing to the optimists. criterion of life refers to touchable “material conditions such as rewards. buying power. nutrient and diet. lodging. wellness and length of life. population growing. and clothing” . These are measurings that optimistic historiographers can obtain quantitatively. In the proceeding statements. advocates to the mill system and industrialisation will supply quantitative grounds to turn out that the quality of life of an mean on the job category individual did increase due to the procedure of industrialisation.

One such optimist bookman G. R. Porter argues that the paramount aim to demo advancement. or a better quality of life. of a people is to demo that its population additions from an earlier period to a comparatively ulterior period. Therefore “between 1780 to 1850 the population of England and Wales rose from some 7. 5 to 18 millions” . Additionally. there is grounds provided by Porter that mortality rates were diminishing. Porter successfully shows that mortality rates decreased well in metropoliss undergoing major industrialisation. such as Manchester. Salford. England. and Wales. through statistics taken from the studies of the Registrar-General.

Harmonizing to the informations so available. “the one-year mortality of England and Wale was 1 in 40 in 1780 ; in 1801. it was 1 in 48 ; and in 1830. it had decreased to 1 in 58” . A lessening in mortality rates. as these Numberss clearly point out. suggests that people were populating healthily. and that healthful conditions were acceptable to bring forth a feasible environment in turning fabrication metropoliss. This statement disproves the impression that the general quality of life of people diminish by congestion of infinite. “by their being brought together in multitudes. ” and by the debut of the mill system.

Therefore. we can reason from the quantitative grounds given above that the criterion of life was improved. The addition in population and the lessening in mortality rates indicate the mill system must hold worked good to supply good life criterions that allow long life spans. If it is non converting that industrialisation improved the quality of life of the on the job category. so at least the grounds defends that the procedure of industrialisation did non deteriorate their criterion of life. increasing ingestion can non be a irect measuring of the wellbeing of workers.

The life criterions are incapable of being measured because they include “home and household life. instruction. drama and leisure. the conditions of work. the psychological version from handicraft to the clip clock and machine subject of the mill system. and kid and adult female labour. ” Pessimists provide grounds for their statements through testimony of the Blue Books. and the books. booklets. and articles used by modern-day perceivers and informants.

These are qualitative grounds and analyses and are used to encompass the traditional household values and those of human values as good. They insist that through the procedure of industrialisation. the quality of life of the working category did so deteriorate. In decision. the argument over whether industrialisation increased or deteriorated the criterion of life of the on the job category is compromised. Advocates to the mill system and the procedure of industrialisation overwhelm their oppositions with statistical informations. turn outing that life criterions improved throughout the continuance of the Industrial Revolution.

Datas such as population growing. low decease rate. better working conditions with less work-related hurts and illnesss. and an addition in salvaging sedimentations signify and is declarative that the working category was under healthy environments. and that their life criterions were improved due to the debut of the mill system. Finally. it is of import to detect the significance of this paper. Its significance lies in supporting logic. scientific discipline. and methodological analysis against personal values and bias. Its significance lies in comparing and contrasting the quantitative method and the qualitative method.

It shows that the qualitative attack to analyse effects of a historical event holds no importance because this qualitative grounds is normally nonreversible. argued from personal values and beliefs. On the contrary. quantitative analyses of grounds provide a more accurate narrative of what happened without the prejudice and personal values. Concrete Numberss do non lie. and from these Numberss we can deduce about what precisely happened. Thus statistical grounds shows us that the Industrial Revolution did better the criterion of life of the societal on the job category.