-Reduce witting procedures to their simplest constituents.
– Determine Torahs by which these elements of consciousness were associated.
– Connect the elements with their physiological conditions.
–Mental maps: expression at real-world jobs
–How people map in. and adapt to. different environments Contributions to the field of Psychology

-Method of Research
-Catalyst for other schools of though

-A focal point on carnal psychological science. which formed the footing of comparative psychological science.
– An accent on the maps instead than the construction of consciousness.
-The credence of methodological analysis and informations from many Fieldss.

– A focal point on the description and measuring of single differences. Criticisms

– Titchener and Kulpe’s methods are subjective studies of the elements of consciousness
– Introspection alters the witting experience it intends on analyzing
– Mind is non capable of analyzing itself
– Meticulously trained perceivers will be biased
– Titchener could non give an exact significance to

Introspection
Structuralism accused of artificiality
– The whole experience can non be captured by a combination of elements
– Limited construct of the field: Titchener regarded carnal psychological science and kid psychological science as non psychological science at all

Came largely from structural linguistics included:
–Any attack to psychology that deviated from the introverted analysis of the head into elements could non genuinely be called psychological science
–Criticisms of the functional psychologists’ involvement in practical concerns Ongoing difference between seeing psychological science as a pure or as an applied scientific discipline.

Mentions
Schultz. D. P. ( 2011 ) . A History of Modern Psychology ( 10th ed. ) . Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook.