The Absolute King Lear Essay, Research Paper

The construct of absolute monarchy comes into being during the early 17th century. For England at this clip, the Tudor dynasty terminals, while the Stuarts Begin theirs. However, it is the latter dynasty that brings the construct into mainstream political relations, because? early Stuart political discourse can so be read as incorporating defense mechanisms of tyranny? ( Burgess 19 ) . James I is the first male monarch of the Stuart line and the first to pattern absolute monarchy. It is said of him at the clip that? James [ I ] described [ sic ] his ideal signifier of authorities. . . from which he sought [ sic ] to warrant his ain absolute authorization and power. . . hence he was [ sic ] to be free and absolute, to be the jurisprudence in and of his land? ( Jordan 15 ) . In happenstance, the beginning of James? reign coincides within the same clip Shakespeare wrote King Lear. In his drama, several scenes link together, demoing that even though the male monarch purportedly gave up his occupation, he can non get away the fact that he is king and will be until his decease. These scenes exemplify certain facets of absolute monarchy. Indeed, the 17th century theory of absolute monarchy provides grounds that, although King Lear bestows his function as king to others, he finally retains the absolute power and behaviour of a sovereign in Shakespeare? s celebrated calamity.

As a consequence of Lear keeping on to his power, in the first scene of the drama he does non take off his royal Crown. Furthermore, Lear provinces, ? The name, and all Thursday? add-on to a male monarch: the sway, / Revenue, executing of the remainder, / Beloved boies, be yours ; which to corroborate, / This coronet portion between you? ( Shakespeare I. i.136-139 ) . Therefore, Lear moves the power from his custodies to those of his sons-in-law, Cornwall and Albany. The coronet is the ocular symbol of this exchange. However, notice that it is a coronet and non Lear? s royal Crown that is used. Foakes is the 1 to indicate out that:

some have thought that when Lear offers a coronet to Cornwall and Albany at I. i.140, he takes one from his ain caput ; but Shakespeare and his audience good knew [ sic ] the difference between Crowns and coronets: Crowns typically. . . were [ sic ] topped with an emblem symbolic of the power belonging to male monarchs. Corornets. . . were [ sic ] circlets worn by princes and dukes. ( 14 )

In other words, symbolically, Lear does non to the full give his up power, because he does non officially give up the Crown. By giving Cornwall and Albany coronets, they are made no more than crowned princes and Lear retains his rubric as male monarch. He can non wholly give up his Crown or power because he realizes that? a sovereign. . . can hold no higher-up for so he would [ sic ] cease to be a sovereign? ( Burgess 24 ) . Therefore, Lear is the supreme, absolute male monarch and can hold no one above him, which the definition of an absolute sovereign provinces.

In add-on to holding supreme power, a sovereign normally likes to hold a batch of gaudery and circumstance around him, to further admit his power, by holding topics fliting about seeking to delight their male monarch. This is exhibited by both King Lear and King James. Furthermore, James? love of exhibitionism is described by a individual in attending at his enthronement who states:

when James [ I ] came to the throne, in the words of Maria Axton: Poets and playwrights worked up pageants for James? s enthronement, interpreting into icons the legal theory which had supported the new King. Their pageant iconography declared that it was non the land, or the estates of Parliament, but the King who represented the power of authorities and the sempiternity of the kingdom. ( Tennenhouse 134 )

Similarly, Lear besides expresses his love of pageantry while life in the palace of his girl Goneril. While at that place, he surrounds himself with topics, who serve him as their male monarch. These topics consist of his knights, sap, and advisor in camouflage, Kent. With his work forces, Lear gives orders, Hunts, and holds tribunal in a palace that is non even his. For this, Goneril gets rather disquieted and says, ? By twenty-four hours and dark he wrongs me. Every hr / He flashes into one gross offense or other / That sets us all at odds. / I? ll non digest it. / His knights grow exuberant and himself upbraids us / On every trifle? ( Shakespeare I. two. 4-8 ) . Furthermore, she is confused about how can Lear go on to command when he has relinquished his power, because she struggles to keep her ain power in her family. Although, her power is 2nd violin to the power that Lear has as an absolute sovereign, and as such can ne’er to the full give up regulation. This is how he is still able to act as a male monarch.

It is non merely his behaviour that gives a sovereign his power, but besides the support of his people and the physical symbols of that support. In an absolute monarchy, ? true power shows itself in the affectional exercising of physical force through competition and is later ratified by an spring of popular support for the displaced male monarch? ( Tennenhouse 133 ) . Lear? s power is foremost bolstered when it is challenged by his girl Goneril. After contending with her, he realizes his? loss of kingly power [ and it ] is accompanied by physical divesture? ( Nelson Greenfield 284 ) . Lear? s advisers can non take their male monarch fring his sense of himself. ? ? Alack, bareheaded? ? Kent mourns ( III. two. 60 ) , and Lear, eventually acknowledging the extent of his loss, begins to rupture off his vesture? ( Nelson Greenfield 284 ) . Kent and the Fool know that Lear? s vesture is imp

ortant as an outward symbol of his power, and seek to forestall him from rupturing it up ( Foakes 20 ) . They support the male monarch by reminding him ( with vesture ) of his power and non allowing him give it up once more. Afterwards, ? Lear is restored to his senses and to his friends, [ and ] his new position is accompanied by new garments: ? In the weightiness of sleep/ We put fresh garments on him ( IV.vii.21-22 ) ? ? ( Nelson Greenfield 285 ) . Besides, a new Crown has been made and? Lear has made the Crown from workss chosen by himself, and crowned himself with them? ( Butler 399 ) . Bing pleased with himself, Lear shouts, ? Ay, every inch a male monarch? ( Shakespeare IV. six. 107 ) . In add-on to back up from friends, Lear? s youngest girl, Cordelia, battles to set her male parent back on the throne. As mentioned above, a male monarch? s true power comes from holding people fight for it. However, Cordelia? s ends are non met, but this does intend that Lear loses the monarchy. In the terminal, Lear? s power is sustained by Albany, who declares that he? vacate [ s ] / During the life of this old stateliness / To him [ Lear ] our absolute power? ( Shakespeare V. three. 297-299 ) . Albany? s support is the last factor turn outing Lear? s legitimacy as male monarch.

Indeed, Lear? s monarchy has been exhaustively legitimized, because Shakespeare? s drama represents a male monarch who has given up his power, but truly does non lose it. Through the theory of absolute monarchy, Lear? s behaviour and nature is seen to be that of an absolute male monarch in assorted scenes. For illustration, symbolically, Lear is dressed the portion of male monarch by retaining his Crown, the ultimate image of kingly regulation. However, for a short clip Lear is without his Crown, but his behaviour is still that of an absolute sovereign which proves his power. Furthermore, he continues to do bids and keeps a kind of mini-court around himself at all times, merely as a true male monarch will make. In add-on, Lear receives the recognition of his topics as their male monarch, which is required in tyranny in order for the male monarch to hold true power. At the terminal of King Lear, Lear is one time once more declared male monarch. After everything that has happened, everyone realizes that Lear has ever retained the power of a sovereign. If Shakespeare had non made King Lear an absolute sovereign, the male monarch would non hold been able to be function the function of king as he did in the really beginning of the drama. Merely an absolute sovereign could accomplish such a thing after purportedly giving up his power in the first topographic point. This thought is exhaustively supported throughout the drama, but what does it intend? What is Shakespeare seeking to state about absolute monarchy?

Because of? Shakespeare? s relentless involvement in affairs of authorities? ( Jordan 13 ) , he? was cognizant of [ the ] absolutist theory? ( Jordan 217 ) . Since he knows of the theory, it likely is evident to him that? to split autonomous power would be to sabotage the peace of the commonwealth and to conflict the scriptural principle that no 1 should function two Masterss ( Bossuet qtd.in ) ? ( Sommerville 350 ) . Although, such an act would hold been considered illegal at the clip, and 17th century Parliament has strict regulations for such things. For illustration, Queen Elizabeth asks her advisers if she can give away some of her land ( Foakes 17 ) . They tell her that land is non personal belongings to give away, but is belongings of the province ( Foakes 17 ) . Harmonizing to them, the lone manner to dispose of land is by a formal missive sealed with the sovereign? s patent ( Foakes 17 ) . In other words, the sovereign is limited and must inquire for permission before administering land. Elizabeth is evidently non an absolute sovereign and will ne’er be. However, in King Lear, land and power are divided and given off, without the male monarch holding to seek advocate. His word is jurisprudence. In Shakespeare? s drama, Lear is an absolute male monarch, but the existent swayers of England at that clip seek to do the same claim. This is particularly true for James I and the swayers that followed him. Can the swayers of England of all time be absolute when they must reply to a Parliament? Possibly Shakespeare is seeking to indicate that they can non when he writes about King Lear, a male monarch who is able to make things that James I would ne’er had been allowed to make. Shakespeare tells them that, unlike Lear, the swayers of England can ne’er be absolute. King Lear serves as a warning for James and subsequently followings, stating them that they can non govern over Parliament. This is a lesson they should hold heeded, for subsequently in the 17th century the sovereign battle for an absolute monarchy, but fail ; merely as Shakespeare said they would.

Bibliography

Butler, F.G. ? Lear? s Crown of Weeds. ? English Studies 70 ( 1989 ) : 395-407.

Burgess, Glenn. Absolute Monarchy and the Stuart Constitution. New Haven: Yale

Up, 1996.

Foakes, R.A. Introduction. King Lear. By William Shakespeare. Walton-on-Thames,

United kingdom: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1997. 1-151.

Jordan, Constance. Shakespeare? s Monarchies. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1997.

Nelson Greenfield, Thelma. ? The Clothing Motif in King Lear. ? Shakspere

Quarterly 5 ( 1954 ) : 281-286.

Sommerville, J.P. ? Absolutism and Royalism. ? . The Cambridge History of Political Thought

1450-1700. Ed. J.H. Burns. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1991. 347-373.

Shakespeare, William. King Lear. Ed. R.A. Foakes. Walton-on-Thames, UK:

Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1997.

Tennenhouse, Leonard. Power on Display. New York: Methuen, 1986.

333